A Matter Of Faith (Part 3 of 4)

Or it'll say allow us to continue this to continue this transmission. How are you all? As you all have an enjoyable refreshment period. All right. Let us begin by saying that there once was a girl who was sewing, some seeds that then began growing on a nearby hill that gave her her fill of knowing that caused her great glowing. Knowingness, did you write down the five things that you know? Is there anyone who would like to begin sharing? All right. What do you know for sure? Begin. What do you know for certain? I know that there is a connection to dawn, which I cannot, beyond what I can see. All right, number one. Number two. Number two, I know that telepathy and deep nonverbal communication exists within me and some of those people and birds to which I interact. All right, number three. I know that I am. All right. Anything else? Yes. I know that something is happening with regard to manifference. manifestations of numbers and names. All right. And I don't know. I did not ask you what you didn't know. Okay. I do know that. I do know that. All right. What else do you know? I know that which I have doubts of become more transparent when interacting with Bashar. All right. All that said. If that is what you know, all else at this moment is supposition. The idea is to relax the supposition and stay in the state of your knowing and allow whatever needs to reveal itself to you about what you know to simply reveal itself in whatever way it chooses to do so. Because however it does so will then, as you know, be a reflection of that knowing state and will not have to be guessed at for what it is or what it represents or what it reflects to you. When you stick simply first and foremost with what you know and take the guesswork out of it and do not ponder what you don't know, you can then be assured. You can then also know that whatever represents itself to you, whatever manifests to you, whatever is reflected to you, will be a person. product of that knowing state, even if it comes in a form you did not expect or imagined would happen. To drop the expectation sufficiently where you can allow the knowing state to really show you what you need to know and by elimination reveal what you don't need to know at that moment will allow you greater clarity. in every moment of your life. Thank you. Next person to share what you know. No. Next person to share what you know. I know I am a talented writer. All right. I know I have created a wonderful organization. All right. I know I have people who love me in my life. All right. I know I am a loving person. All right.

need to know at that moment will allow you greater clarity. in every moment of your life. Thank you. Next person to share what you know. No. Next person to share what you know. I know I am a talented writer. All right. I know I have created a wonderful organization. All right. I know I have people who love me in my life. All right. I know I am a loving person. All right. And I know that I am a loving person. impact many people no remember what we said about impact can you remind me please yes you do impact everyone this is true but remember that the idea of what you do doesn't cause the impact it all right remember yes all right thank you you all already have all the impact you will ever have what you do by following your joy does not create more impact It reveals the impact you're already having. Then I can rephrase that to say, I know that I have the realization that I am impacted. It is all right for you to say it the way you said it as long as you realize how it is meant. Yes. Structurally. Yes. Stay again in those states of knowing. All else that is not revealed in that state in that state does not need to be known at this moment. Even if I'm getting the reflection. back from people that I have impacted them? Isn't that true? That's a revelation of your impact. Okay. It is not that the thing you did caused it, the thing you did revealed it. And they are simply reflecting the revelation. We are discussing the difference, which may at times seem to be a fine line, but isn't. We're discussing the difference between falling into the illusion that you need to do something to impact the world and living in the realization that you already all impact the world and that by following your joy, you are simply uncovering and revealing that impact as opposed to having to do something special in order to cause the impact. So what's being reflected to you is simply the revelation of impact you already have just by the very fact of your existence. Then I'll rephrase that to say that I know that I'm following my joy. Thank you. Thank you, Bashar. Who else would like to be sure? like to share what they know for certain. Hi, Bashar. And do you, good day? After trying this experiment, something interesting came to me. Everything that I thought I knew or know, I could contradict. Very good. And so I just... So what do you actually know for certain? For certain that I don't know Jack. Who's that? You don't know Jack either. But I did not ask you what you don't know. No, I, you know... You do know at least the few things we discussed this day.

day? After trying this experiment, something interesting came to me. Everything that I thought I knew or know, I could contradict. Very good. And so I just... So what do you actually know for certain? For certain that I don't know Jack. Who's that? You don't know Jack either. But I did not ask you what you don't know. No, I, you know... You do know at least the few things we discussed this day. And I said you could use them on your list if you wished to. You do know that you exist. Maybe I'm getting too esoteric and I probably am. Maybe you are. But, you know that you exist? Of course you do. It feels like I do. I think I am. You do. Because if you can think you do, you do. You do. Otherwise, you wouldn't be able to think that you do. Correct? Do you not see the simple logic? Yeah. I mean, I do at one level for sure. There is no other level here. That's the point. And that's where you get too esoteric. You think there are more levels and there's more complexity than there is. There isn't. Do you exist? Yes or no. There is no other answer. And no is not possible as an answer. Then I'm getting way too esoteric. Yes. Yes, I exist. So that's a number. another thing you know. Touch. Don't get all French with me. We. Okay. Yeah. Would you like to simply take time to make a new list? Sure. Attempting it from a less esoteric place? I know I have feeling. All right. You know. You see how simple that is? And I know I have an experience that I'm becoming more familiar with of this invisibility I spoke about yesterday. All right. You see, knowing statements are simple statements. They are not complicated. They're simple statements. So maybe what it is is it's something where I know it for myself, but I can't prove it to anybody else. That is not a criteria. Right. And maybe that's what I was thinking. Because you can't prove anything to anyone else anyway. else anyway. Right. Okay. You can't even prove you exist to anyone else. I know. That's exactly. That's the discussion I had at lunch. But that's not the question. I only asked you what you knew, not what you felt you had to prove. Yep. And that's very revealing. I got it. And now you know that about yourself. I got it. Thank you. Thank you. Let us for a moment shift to the idea of idea of what you may call the regular questions. We will come back to what you know. And I, Abashar. And good day to you. Greetings. First thing I'm going to do is give you my list. I actually don't have five things on my list. All right. I only have three things. All right. I know that I exist. Yes.

Thank you. Thank you. Let us for a moment shift to the idea of idea of what you may call the regular questions. We will come back to what you know. And I, Abashar. And good day to you. Greetings. First thing I'm going to do is give you my list. I actually don't have five things on my list. All right. I only have three things. All right. I know that I exist. Yes. I know what I observe. I know what I feel. Yes. detail of one of those three. That's four things. No, I'm just speculating that last one. It's still something you know. I'm kidding. All right. Okay, now to the question that I want to ask. You've mentioned the subject of time this weekend, several times. And I want to revisit the question that was asked last night about the concept of frequency and the fact that it is a function of time. Yes. Yes. And I want to get into some more technical detail about that. All right. Now, I've been aware for 30-some-odd years that our experience of physical reality is a sequential focusing of our attention on a sequence of different universes, if I'm understanding correctly. Very much in the way that... In a sense, yes. Yeah. In a way that... motion picture film is a sequence of still frames. This is, of course, all still an analogy, but it will do as a representative one with regard to the third-dimensional space-time matrix. Okay. And I am speaking specifically of physical reality. Yes, I know. And within this context, it would mean that within the idea of an infinitude of different universes and different realities and different dimensions is the idea that is the idea that when we experience movement, what we are actually experiencing is instantaneous shifts from one physical reality, from one dimension, to another one that is very, very close in structure. Yes. And going through a whole series of these, just like a series of frames in a motion picture. Correct. Gives the illusion of motion. Yes. And that that motion gives the illusion of time. Yes. Yes. Because we do it at a very deliberate pace for the most part. Yes. Especially when we have a clock that is measuring this, that the movement of the clock really establishes the standard of time. Yes. Okay. So I'm correct in my understanding that each of these frames of physical reality is essentially static. Yes. Okay. And this gets back to the change and no change idea that we were talking about earlier. Yes. everything is changed, but there is no change. Correct. Okay. So each of these physical realities is static. Yes. And now let's bring in the idea of frequency. Yes. Frequency is vibrations per unit of time. Yes. But time is the illusion of motion, which is a shifting from one dimension to the next.

static. Yes. Okay. And this gets back to the change and no change idea that we were talking about earlier. Yes. everything is changed, but there is no change. Correct. Okay. So each of these physical realities is static. Yes. And now let's bring in the idea of frequency. Yes. Frequency is vibrations per unit of time. Yes. But time is the illusion of motion, which is a shifting from one dimension to the next. And I'm wondering exactly how frequency relates to that shifting from one dimension. The frequency that you create in your consciousness when you create the illusion of time is what determines exactly which frames fall into the slot that give you your sense of continuity. Does that make sense? I didn't totally get it. All right. The ideas that you create in your consciousness, the illusion of time, by creating creating the concept of frequency. Yeah. In doing so, once you have created that, it then determines which of the static sequence of parallel realities you actually experience as your continuity of motion. Because let's just say, again, even though I understand there may be shortcomings in third dimensional language to express this. Let's say you choose to operate on a certain frequency within your consciousness. Okay. By establishing that frequency, by setting up that illusion of time and frequency, you might choose every third frame, or every second frame, or every fifth frame as your expression of change in space. Okay. So the frequency at which you operate determines exactly how you experience the idea of the continuity of motion. Okay. Okay. Which frames are represented in that sense. Okay. So would a higher frequency be a skipping of more frames? Yes. Okay. But really, there's not really a skipping of frames. No, not really. Those frames that you're quote-unquote skipping just aren't part of that motion picture of your existence. Correct. Okay. Now let's get into the idea of frequency of non-physical beings. beings. Yes. Because I understand that they also experience or express a frequency. To some degree, yes. Okay. But if they are not experiencing or not focused in physical reality... Yes. And we've been talking about frequency of progression of attention on frames in physical reality. Yes. Is there... There are frames of non-physical reality too. Okay. So... They are just of a different quality. Different quality. quality, what would distinguish the quality that they experienced from the quality we experience? It would be similar to the analogy, perhaps, of having double exposures in each frame, so that you can actually focus on one thing or another in any frame. It's not quite so structured, not quite so limited. Okay. Let me bring into this discussion another technological analogy. Yes. Our motion picture frame is, our motion picture film is a series of frames connected together in a sequence. And you can actually cut these. Yes. But we have now non-linear editing, an electronic thing.

having double exposures in each frame, so that you can actually focus on one thing or another in any frame. It's not quite so structured, not quite so limited. Okay. Let me bring into this discussion another technological analogy. Yes. Our motion picture frame is, our motion picture film is a series of frames connected together in a sequence. And you can actually cut these. Yes. But we have now non-linear editing, an electronic thing. Or you can put the frames together in any way you want. I almost set it to go random and it'll pick frames. Yes, and this is also a quality of the frames in non-physical reality. Okay, this is what I'm thinking. What you're describing sounds to me like the non-linear editing. Yes. approach. So you could say physical reality is more linear based and non-physical reality is more non-linear based even though they're both using frames. Okay. So then getting back to the concept of frequency, both physicals and non-physical's experience or expressed the idea of frequency. Yes. The non-physicals at the higher frequency, I'm getting the idea that means that they are, does it mean that they are experiencing the frames of reality at a higher rate? It doesn't always mean that, although they can. Okay. But it really is more like is the concept of high definition that now exists in your reality. There's more information per frame that they can access. Okay. And I'm getting that they can probably look at a lot of different frames at the same time. Yes. Okay. Which constitutes the idea of double-exposed frames or multiply exposed frames from their point of view. Okay. I was thinking more like a bank of television sets, but I see how the bank. Any analogy will work. Okay. I gotcha. Even then, it still implies that there's some kind of a, the fact that there's a sequentialness to it implies that there's a sequentialness to it implies that there's kind of a fundamental idea of time that doesn't necessarily, or rather, is not rigid for the non-physicals, but more rigid for the physicals. Yes. Remember that. Anything, anything aside from the one must experience some degree of what you're talking about, or it wouldn't be represented as different from the one. Thank you. That totally clarifies that whole thing. It's just a matter of degree. Yeah. Okay. And in physical reality, at least in our physical reality at this point in time, Yes. Our time is highly structured. Yes. standardized except for people who are wafting out of it and back into and that kind of thing. That's what the idea of the increase of your frequency is all about is you're starting to exist in that quasi-planar reality that is shifting dimensionality and gives you more access to more information per frame. Okay. Now, relating this to your experience in your reality, I understand that you move around.

time is highly structured. Yes. standardized except for people who are wafting out of it and back into and that kind of thing. That's what the idea of the increase of your frequency is all about is you're starting to exist in that quasi-planar reality that is shifting dimensionality and gives you more access to more information per frame. Okay. Now, relating this to your experience in your reality, I understand that you move around. You may walk from your control chair to the doorway, of your spacecraft. So you are experiencing time also. To some degree, yes. Although we have more facility with allowing it to be more flexible. I understand, but if you are actually walking from your chair to the door, that is an experience of time. Yes. And although in the next instant you may be down on the surface of your planet, and then back up two instance later, there is the sense of time in that there's actual movement and you can observe movement. Yes. walking around on your planet. We understand it enough to be able to relate to your sense of time, yes. Okay. And it is a realm that we ourselves have, at least to some degree, also come up through. We were in that sense more structured in the beginning of our evolution than we are now. Were you ever as structured or at least standardized in your experience of time as we are? No. Okay. We were created to be less standardized to begin with. Gotcha. Okay. I believe that answers my question in its entirety. Thank you. Thank you. Hi, Bashar. And are you, good day? Uh, Jill, I know what I don't want to ask you. Um, Bashar, you, uh, what's this I understand about your birthday in 11-11, November 11th? The idea of our time frame overlaps your time frame so that there is a corresponding date that represents my birthday, as best as can be translated into your calendar. It's not that we have the same kind of calendar, but we are simply saying that the idea of our reality, as it overlaps with yours, will create a coincidal date that is represented by the date 1111. I find that very interesting because my wife and I decided very strongly to get married on 1111. Yes. And we're having our first anniversary in a couple days on 1111. Congratulations. Thank you very much. For us, the idea represents something similar to the word in our ancient language, Ely. Ely. Ely. Which is, in that sense, a reflective mirror. Ely. Ely. Ely. The reflection. If you say that backwards, it's Eelie. Yes. Interesting. And so was 1111. Very interesting. I was at the gym, say, about six months ago, and I was listening. I was listening on my iPod to one of your talks. And I-Pod. All right. iPod, one of our recording devices playing back.

to the word in our ancient language, Ely. Ely. Ely. Which is, in that sense, a reflective mirror. Ely. Ely. Ely. The reflection. If you say that backwards, it's Eelie. Yes. Interesting. And so was 1111. Very interesting. I was at the gym, say, about six months ago, and I was listening. I was listening on my iPod to one of your talks. And I-Pod. All right. iPod, one of our recording devices playing back. If you guys haven't heard about it up there, then I mean, it's all over the place over here. Wow. You see, we have we pods. Ooh, I like that. I like that. That's good. Oh, I like that a lot. We pods. So your pods are like really small? I'm sorry. Anyway. Okay. What I wanted to ask here, I'm sorry. Too much sake at lunch. What I wanted to ask was, so I was, so I'm working out at the gym, and all of a sudden I heard you say on the talk that you have interacted with us physically, in some cases, and then we've forgotten. I found myself laughing. Oh, right, why? I instantaneously went into laughter. Yes. And I don't know why. And I wanted to ask you, have, did you and I actually meet at that instant when I heard that on my iPod? Not as you understand time. Okay, I'm talking about the physical time that we're talking about right now. Not as you mean time, not at that instant exactly. I see. And to get, because you and I have talked about this before about, uh, you, uh, you, uh, uh, us. having met several times in the past. Yes. And me not having any, not even a sense of, of time loss, which I hear is, is common. No, no, no, no. You will have no sense of time loss in this. The meetings take place in a time suspended arena. Ah. Okay. Have you ever shown up at any one of these gatherings to date? Yes. Really? Yes. Cool. Whatever temperature you want. Several years ago, I was actually talking with April, and she mentioned that you actually initially talked to us probably 10, 20 years ago, about three laws, not four laws, and you have since discovered a fourth law. Did I get that right? We understood the four laws, but it wasn't ready to be applied. to our conversations. I see. So you had known about it, but it was only appropriate to talk about the first three or whatever the three were. Yes. We had to establish a baseline before we went into the idea of altering that. I understand. Okay, good. Okay, that's it for me. Thank you. Are you sure? Appreciate it. I got some more, but I'll let it give somebody else a chance. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Hi, Bashar. Any of you, good day. My question is, where does existence come from? Itself.

three or whatever the three were. Yes. We had to establish a baseline before we went into the idea of altering that. I understand. Okay, good. Okay, that's it for me. Thank you. Are you sure? Appreciate it. I got some more, but I'll let it give somebody else a chance. All right. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Hi, Bashar. Any of you, good day. My question is, where does existence come from? Itself. It doesn't come from anywhere. Your question itself does not fit in the idea that you are asking. Existence does not come from. Existence only is. How come there's just not nothing? There is, but even nothing is something. Nothing is different from our perspective. than non-existence. Is that what you're actually referring to when you say nothing? No, I mean, it seems like way back when. There is no way back when, except within existence. You may be confused because the idea is that time is subject to existence. Existence is not subject to time. Time is a concept within existence. Existence is not a concept within time. It seems like there had to be some start to it all. It seems like there had to be some start to it all. I know it seems like that to you. And within existence, there are starts and stops. Yes, but not to existence itself. How could it ever get created? It didn't. It just is. Creation happens within existence. All the concepts you can possibly imagine about beginnings, creations, starts, and so forth are concepts within existence. There is no outside to existence. Is it not possible to imagine? with the human mind, how the totality of existence? No. Because you cannot imagine non-existence. Try it. I'm trying. You can't. I'm having a hard time. You can't. It's not possible. Understand, again, pay attention to the definitions. Non-existence. There could be, by definition, no expression, no experience. Non-existence means, non-existence means. No experience whatsoever. So you can't experience it, and especially then, of course, you can't express no experience. The only thing you can express the experience of is existence. There is nothing beyond it, outside of it, before it, it just is, and is not subject to the concepts of outside, beyond, and before. Those are. are concepts within existence. So is existence growing and evolving itself? In a sense, within itself, but not as itself. I don't understand. I know. Existence is. It is all that is already. But within itself, it can have the experience of growing and expanding and learning and becoming. more and more infinitely. Nevertheless, even though it's having that experience within itself, it itself is unchanging. Because it simply is. Wow. Does that make sense? Not entirely. I know, I know. But that's all right. Okay. I do have a second question. Yes. Just curious, what is an average day for you like? Like, what do you do? all day. Oh, let's see. Breakfast at night.

of growing and expanding and learning and becoming. more and more infinitely. Nevertheless, even though it's having that experience within itself, it itself is unchanging. Because it simply is. Wow. Does that make sense? Not entirely. I know, I know. But that's all right. Okay. I do have a second question. Yes. Just curious, what is an average day for you like? Like, what do you do? all day. Oh, let's see. Breakfast at night. How do you organize your days? Synchronistically. We don't organize. We don't plan. What might an average day look like? I'm getting there. First of all, I understand how you mean the term. But since we don't sleep anymore, we don't really have beginnings and endings and endings. anymore at all. And since we're not always on our planet anymore, we don't even necessarily go by things like sunrise and sunset anymore either. However, the idea of the so-called average day for me might be that I will be in contact with several different civilizations, establishing rapport and communications to allow for the continuation of relationships or even the beginning of them. I will also go on exploratory missions within spaceships, sometimes my own scoutcraft, sometimes what you call city ships or mother ships, to investigate and explore various regions of the universe or other multiverse dimensionalities. Sometimes I will participate in the expression of art. Sometimes I will participate in the expression of song if it moves me to do so. Sometimes I will interact one-on-one with various beings. Sometimes I will communicate in the way I'm communicating now to all of you with, you and others as well. These are some of the typical quote-unquote things that are representative of my passion. That does sound exciting. I think so. Oh, oh, wait a minute. I know so. There will be a little bit more of an extension of this idea when we get into our story after your next break. Thank you. Thank you. Hello, Bashar. And are you good day? Okay, so I have a question for you that I've been trying to figure out how I want to ask it. So I'm just going to ask as I do. Yes. When I was very little in my understanding of time in this space and this body now, I remember an encounter that I had with about three or five beings. and they lifted me up Yes. To the point of levitation. Yes. And they danced with me. Yes. And I looked down and was very cognizant of the fact that I was not standing on the ground anymore. Yes. And we were laughing and it was really joyful and really fun. And very soon it became really fast and really intense. Yes. And the beings began to crush me. crush me. Crush in what sense? In the sense that their grip was so tight that it hurt me. All right. Physically. All right.

And I looked down and was very cognizant of the fact that I was not standing on the ground anymore. Yes. And we were laughing and it was really joyful and really fun. And very soon it became really fast and really intense. Yes. And the beings began to crush me. crush me. Crush in what sense? In the sense that their grip was so tight that it hurt me. All right. Physically. All right. And I asked them to stop, because they were hurting me and they didn't. Yes. And they kept going. Yes. And in that instant, it was as if I knew that I was choosing to be open and to experience unconditional love and joy. However, I was so fearful that it was my beginning of my death. beginning of my definition of what darkness was. All right. And my inability to express and be respected regarding what was true for me. All right. They did not intend to hurt you. And on whatever level they are capable of expressing it, they would apologize. However, what you didn't understand at that point is that you were being shifted interdimensionally in a certain way. The rate of acceleration was very great. was very great in terms of that dimensional shift. They had to hold you very tightly so they wouldn't lose you. You understand? I think so. They simply had to hold on to you. They understood it may have caused discomfort, but it would have caused far more discomfort had they let go or even loosened their grip. I understand that. So it wasn't intentional. but it was simply a side effect of experiencing a greater acceleration than anyone anticipated. And they simply had to hold on to you for your dear life. Or you would have been lost. So they apologize. It wasn't their intention to harm. Thank you. All right. So my question in addition to that is to that is for the majority of my time in this body, in this life, that I've chosen, I feel as if I've chosen to be, to absorb. Absorb, what? When I walk into rooms, I just, or I'm just in, I just feel like I absorb energy and people and thoughts and emotion and I almost lose sense of what my true self is and what my true is and what my true experience is. But what do you want to do with that absorption? How do you want to apply it? How do you want to express it creatively in your life? I don't know. All right. Well, you can take some time and figure that out. Okay. Because the absorption is important, but the expression is also important. You see, you are a transformer. So absorbing energy is one thing, but you transform it through yourself and then express it in a way that's unique to you and add your own energy to the mix. Add your own expression. Your own energy.

creatively in your life? I don't know. All right. Well, you can take some time and figure that out. Okay. Because the absorption is important, but the expression is also important. You see, you are a transformer. So absorbing energy is one thing, but you transform it through yourself and then express it in a way that's unique to you and add your own energy to the mix. Add your own expression. Your own energy. own creativity to the mix by following your passion. Does that help? Somewhat, yeah. Anywhere else you would like to take this? Is there anything you have to offer more? Is there any way you would specifically like to express your passion that you're not doing? As a guide. In what sense? To myself and to others. How. Specifically, how? Through what methodology, through what expression, through what behavior? Channeling. In what way? There are many forms of channeling. I haven't decided which one. There is not one that stands out as more exciting to you than any other? Movement and water. All right. Then why don't you begin by exploring that without expectation and see where it leads? All right? Okay, thank you. Have fun. Thank you. Hi, Bashar. And are you good day? I want to tell you one of my absolutely knows. All right. What do you know for sure? I absolutely know that I have been anticipating this day happily. And I want to thank you and I absolutely know I love you. We absolutely and unconditionally know beyond a shadow of a doubt that we love you as well. I know. I have a question. Yes, I thought so. Although I'd like to stay in the love with you, I will ask this question. Do not necessarily assume that asking the question takes you out of love with us. Well, it does divert my attention a little bit. Diversion of attention doesn't mean you're out of love. Yes, okay. There are many forms of expression of love. I do now know this. Thank you. Earlier today, the woman discussed her experience with the father. experience with the fire. Yes. So I have a question. Yes. One frame, she is watching on TV, the hillside, close to her home that is burning. Yes. Get some guidance. Yes. Shifts her attention. Yes. And now is in another reality. Yes, so to speak. What happens to the, what I'm having trouble with is understanding what happens to the consciousness that was in the reality. in the reality where it does burn. It's still there. Is that not part of her? Yes. It's part of the over soul. Not part of her, part of the over soul in the way you mean it. Yes. And I guess somewhere I have this idea that we're supposed to be integrative, so we have all of that. So I don't really understand how we shift our focus from, do you know what?

reality. in the reality where it does burn. It's still there. Is that not part of her? Yes. It's part of the over soul. Not part of her, part of the over soul in the way you mean it. Yes. And I guess somewhere I have this idea that we're supposed to be integrative, so we have all of that. So I don't really understand how we shift our focus from, do you know what? Sometimes different realities in and of themselves by definition represent an integrated state. Okay. So it's not that you have to still have the attributes of the you and the other reality to assume you are integrated. It's that shifting to a more integrated reality can be represented in and of itself by a particular version of you. Does that make sense? Yes. I guess I still have this idea and maybe I can't understand it from... Is there still a consciousness alive in the place that burns? Yes. Yes, of course. Is that not part of her? It is not part of her. Okay. It's part of the over soul that gives life to them both. So who is this part that chooses the focus? The over soul. So the over soul chooses to have conscious focus awareness somewhere and not put its attention other where, but it still has... Its attention is everywhere. Okay. The point is, however, is that for that parallel reality, parallel reality that you are now talking about that she quote unquote has shifted to. Her focus of attention in that reality makes it seem as if the other realities are now subsidiary. Just as you right now make it seem as if any other simultaneous reality is subsidiary. It doesn't mean that there isn't consciousness in all the other versions of you simultaneously. simultaneously. But for you right now in this reality, the definition of you in this reality makes the other reality seem subsidiary. So the definition of her in the reality makes the other ones seem subsidiary. When we talk about the idea of shifting, that is also to some degree an analogy. Okay. Because you all exist everywhere at once. So really, if you want me to be very precise, no real shift has actually occurred per se. It's just that the oversoul is now choosing, in a sense, to allow that aspect of itself to have an experience that makes it seem as if all other subsidiary selves are in fact not really directly involved anymore. anymore. Does this make any sense to you in third-dimensional language? Yes, so you're really saying that what I experience here is my consciousness is really so overshadowed by this over-s, the over-soul is picking on a sense. It's not that it's overshadowed. It's that you have made an agreement. Right. And in that agreement, you have agreed to experience certain things, a certain definition of that reality. Okay.

fact not really directly involved anymore. anymore. Does this make any sense to you in third-dimensional language? Yes, so you're really saying that what I experience here is my consciousness is really so overshadowed by this over-s, the over-soul is picking on a sense. It's not that it's overshadowed. It's that you have made an agreement. Right. And in that agreement, you have agreed to experience certain things, a certain definition of that reality. Okay. And in that definition, often, you have agreed to experience certain things, a certain definition of that reality. Okay. times you, because of the way you're used to experiencing reality, will make all other parallel simultaneous realities subsidiary. Now, she could have gone into that reality, so to speak, let's just say awakened to that point of view, also still very aware, very aware of the one in the other reality simultaneously that did not stop fire, so to speak. You follow me? Mm-hmm. That can be done and often actually is done, but because of the way your people have been taught to think about consciousness, often when that's done, you call them crazy and insane or multiple personality disorders. You follow me? It's not that you can't be simultaneously aware of more than one reality. It's just that you haven't practiced learning how to integrate them in a way, most of you, that allows you to make sense of that multiple awareness in each of the realities constructively. Those of you that can do that are not labeled insane, you're labeled genius. Does that make sense? Mm-hmm. Or savant's. Does that make sense? Mm-hmm. Does this answer the question? Yes, I have an additional question. All right. You've referenced. the over-soul. Over-soul. Over-soul. Let's say in this time and space of my life. Yes. Are there other pieces of my over-soul that I am interacting with here physically? Simultaneous co-incarnations? Yes. Yes. Thank you. Thank you. Good day, Bashar. And to you, good day. I would like to start with. I would like to start with mathematics. Mathematics. I'm very interested in if mathematics is basic to reality. It depends. There are some constants, but not everywhere. And of course it can be expressed differently by different civilizations and cultures. The same mathematics can be expressed differently. differently. Of course. For example, what you call in your quantum physics formulas or equations using mathematical symbols that express the idea known as the uncertainty principle, or such similar concepts, might be expressed in our civilization simply by a geometric form, rather than an equation of symbols. Do you follow me? I follow, but that means that there is a mathematical structure. structural structure, more basic, of which these two are models. Yes. Okay. Yes. And also some New Age literature speaks about being there being seven levels or 12 dimensions. But the number seven seems particularly significant as there being soul groups being multiples of seven. seven.

in our civilization simply by a geometric form, rather than an equation of symbols. Do you follow me? I follow, but that means that there is a mathematical structure. structural structure, more basic, of which these two are models. Yes. Okay. Yes. And also some New Age literature speaks about being there being seven levels or 12 dimensions. But the number seven seems particularly significant as there being soul groups being multiples of seven. seven. Well, yes, but remember that while accurate from their perception, some of those hierarchical distinctions, while to some degree representative of different frequency levels, are also distinctly germane to the level that is perceiving them. Other realities might perceive the same concept in a number of different ways. Okay, because I thought that if there are seven levels and not eight or nine, or whatever, that seems to contradict the idea that all that this is really all that is. Again, the idea of seven levels, as I said, is an arbitrary distinction being made from your reality. It's the way your reality needs to interpret the concept of infinity for itself in a certain way. From the level of all that is, it doesn't necessarily see itself as being separated into seven levels. But it understands that from the earth perspective, seven levels makes the most sense based on the frequencies and the juxtaposition of geometries and mathematics of energy, as you need to express the concept of shifting frequencies. Okay, but it also seems that there is a basic physics to reality, to energy, to consciousness. And that seems to imply that because of the nature of energy, some things are possible, and some things are not possible. Some things are possible or not possible within any localized reality. But anything you can imagine exists somewhere within infinity. Or you could not imagine it. Okay, but that just, it means that if I can imagine it, then it exists. It exists somewhere. It may not be pertinent to your local reality. I understand, but my imagination can be limited. can be limited because Yes. Your imagination may be limited, but anything you are capable of imagining exists. I'm not saying you can imagine everything that is, but I'm saying everything you do imagine does exist somewhere. Okay, but I can imagine that all that is is all that it can be, but not all that it can be seems to be, well, maybe it cannot be everything. So maybe it's limited because it's nature. its nature. All right, but what you have simply now done is imagined a limited all that is within an infinite one. You see, you have created a localized representation within an infinite one. Okay. That's what you've done with your imagination. Yes, of course. You can imagine a limited all that is. And that exists within the infinite one. Okay. Does it also mean that there's no limit to how good you can feel?

its nature. All right, but what you have simply now done is imagined a limited all that is within an infinite one. You see, you have created a localized representation within an infinite one. Okay. That's what you've done with your imagination. Yes, of course. You can imagine a limited all that is. And that exists within the infinite one. Okay. Does it also mean that there's no limit to how good you can feel? Well, that is a relatively subjective thing. You could say that there might be various ways in which people interpret the concept of feeling good. That's right, yeah. So it would depend on a case-by-case basis as to what that individual might mean by I feel good. In a sense, there is no limit. There is no limit pragmatically to how good you can feel. But there might be certain states of being that you might imagine would be ecstatic states that may not actually be capable of being experienced by your neurological system. Okay. Let keys into the next question is that I understand everything is equally valuable. valuable. Yes. So the end is equally valuable as all that is. Yes. But the localized consciousness is limited. So it cannot, for instance, choose to experience ecstasy or something like that. Yes, it can. Within its own framework, to whatever degree it is capable of experiencing something, it is free to choose to experience that thing. I understand. But with the concept of the over-soul, it seems as if that's the... if that's the way, that's the life you want. The oversaw experiences everything and the aspect. Now you are making a value judgment. When you say it seems that that's the life you want, you are devaluing the fact that you chose to have this life. Well, not in an absolute value sense that it has value, but in a sense that it is preferable. What I am saying is the reason you chose the life you're living is because at the time you made that choice, this was preforable. preferable too. You just don't remember. It's equal in preference to the oversaw's existence. And from that level you knew that. Right now, you don't know that. Thank you very, very much. Thank you. Is there anyone who would like to share more of what they know? Hi, Bashar. And are you a good day? What do you know for sure? What do I know through you? your teachings and so I thank you. No, just what do you know? Okay. Doesn't matter how you know it. Through me, through anything, what do you know? I know that I'm multi-dimensional. All right. I know. How do you know that? I just know. All right. There's no doubt. There's no question for you at this point in your life. Right. It is an absolute certainty for you. Yes. Thank you. What else do you know? Reality is an illusion.

you. No, just what do you know? Okay. Doesn't matter how you know it. Through me, through anything, what do you know? I know that I'm multi-dimensional. All right. I know. How do you know that? I just know. All right. There's no doubt. There's no question for you at this point in your life. Right. It is an absolute certainty for you. Yes. Thank you. What else do you know? Reality is an illusion. Yeah, the experience of it is real. Yes. All right. What else do you know? I know that I'm consciousness in the form, this human form, and with this particular personality. Yes. And that my reality is shaped by my beliefs. All right. And I'm working hard to change this. And you know you're what? You know you're working hard? Well, right. I know that. All right. With a lot of certainty. All right. And finally, recently, I know I'm loved unconditionally. Oh. all that is. Thank you. Is this state of knowing capable thus then of being applied to other areas of your life where you feel more uncertain? Yes. All right. You know that too, then? Yes. All right. Anything else you want to squeak in there that you know for sure? Not that I can think of right now. All right. So at this moment, you know that you don't know anything else for sure. Correct? That's correct. So that's something else you know. Yes. Thank you. Let's be thorough after all. Okay. Is there something you wish to share? In terms of questions? If you wish. Oh, okay. Yes, first of all, I did also want to thank you, of course, for the interaction, send you infinite love, and that every moment's spent with you. Each and every moment is a pleasure. with you all as well. Yes. Or we wouldn't do it. Thank you. I also wanted to first share that the impact of what you presented earlier in terms of the I am message. Yes. Because not only did it help with the knowingness, but it helped me to realize the importance of the energy behind words and phrases and symbols and sound and whatnot. All right. It really... Thank you. All of you, together, I am. I am. Just a reminder of how simple it is to be in a knowing state. And it's interesting because there was a time when I couldn't say those words. I was a little hesitant and maybe even a little fearful, as if I didn't want to reach that point. So, okay. I think these are two quick questions. Going back to the analogy that you used about the matrix of now moments. Yes. I really love that analogy because I tend to think of it in that way. So I kind of envision that. that there's this matrix and, you know, there's all the possibilities. Yes. And just as an example, I'm preparing for an interview for a job.

want to reach that point. So, okay. I think these are two quick questions. Going back to the analogy that you used about the matrix of now moments. Yes. I really love that analogy because I tend to think of it in that way. So I kind of envision that. that there's this matrix and, you know, there's all the possibilities. Yes. And just as an example, I'm preparing for an interview for a job. And I'm say that in that matrix, there's a particular path, you know, that I've been moving along. And there's going to be one of those moments that's the interview. And whatever energy I bring into that particular moment, my question is, since I'm interacting with another, another consciousness so to speak okay well that's the yeah that's part of it too because if for all one that's I'm trying to figure this out remember it's this and that not this or that you're interacting with another consciousness and you're also interacting with your own only okay because any other consciousness you interact with you interact with you still have to create your version of in your reality in order to perceive it right right so in other words I Is it saying that we can kind of pick and choose literally the reality that we want to have so I can pick that now moment that I want to have in the time of the interview? Gosh, I guess so. I guess that's what we've been saying for, oh, 24 of your years. Okay. Yes. Okay. Choose, choose, choose. Yes. Choose. Without expectation. But now, why do you say that? Because we understand that the mechanisms of your personality will often think, oh, I can choose for this to come out exactly. this way with this outcome, this consequence, this result. Not understanding that the moment you do that, often what you're doing is actually limiting yourself, judging yourself, shutting the doors to the way in which the manifestation could actually occur in a greater form than you ever imagined. Okay. So go into the moment, being the moment, because that's the moment you want to be, not because of what you think that moment will get you. Okay. Because when you do that, you are doing what? You are conditionalizing infinity. You are putting conditions on infinity, saying, I only want it to come out this way. If it doesn't come out this way, my life's not working. Okay. And then you take yourself out of the state. The only purpose for being in the state you prefer to be in is to be in the state you prefer to be in. Okay. Circumstances don't matter. It matter. Only your state of being matters. Very good. Does that help? It certainly does. Thank you. Thank you. And one last question. Yes. This refers to what I'm going to call for the moment, the back end part of the mechanism for physical healing.

state. The only purpose for being in the state you prefer to be in is to be in the state you prefer to be in. Okay. Circumstances don't matter. It matter. Only your state of being matters. Very good. Does that help? It certainly does. Thank you. Thank you. And one last question. Yes. This refers to what I'm going to call for the moment, the back end part of the mechanism for physical healing. The back end part of the mechanism. The front end is recently. describe permission slips. So I understand what you were saying there and say that a person wants to do some physical healing and they could either choose perhaps an allopathic form or a holistic form, say detoxification or even energy healing. And this is the reason why I lead to this question. Yes. So the person's frequency, their belief system will determine which option they choose. Yes. And then you are also describing that it's really, you know, all those methods are valid, but it's the power that we put behind, you know, our belief and the method that we choose that actually generates the healing. Did I understand that correctly? The idea is that you give off a frequency. Others that are attracted to you pick up on that frequency. They can then decide that if that frequency matches the idea of their perfect ideal state of health, if they then choose to match that frequency, that's what they will experience. Okay. But you are putting out of frequency to allow them to use it however they wish. If for some reason it serves everyone that you would attract a person who adamantly believes they cannot be healed by anyone and they expose themselves to your frequency and are not healed. They do not heal themselves. Then they get to say, see, I proved it. My belief stands. And you have helped them reinforce a belief that they have chosen to hold on to. by them not allowing themselves to be healed. So you have still served them. Does that make sense? Yes, I do understand that. That's also why you don't need to have expectation. Because you don't necessarily need to know what anyone else's agenda is in coming to you. They may come to you to reinforce a belief they simply don't want to give up. But you have still helped them by helping them do what they want to do. Now, that may not happen in the majority of cases, but you have to allow for it because that's valid for them. Makes sense? Yes. Now, what I was referring to is kind of like the back end of the mechanism. Yes. Like with energy healing, if a person believes that that that will heal them. Yes. And it truly does.

you have still helped them by helping them do what they want to do. Now, that may not happen in the majority of cases, but you have to allow for it because that's valid for them. Makes sense? Yes. Now, what I was referring to is kind of like the back end of the mechanism. Yes. Like with energy healing, if a person believes that that that will heal them. Yes. And it truly does. What my question is, from that belief to our physical body, which has its own consciousness, I was wondering what that mechanism is, in other words, is it that the power of the belief and the intention, actually, more or less, I'm using these words loosely, sends instructions to the consciousness of the physical body that, you know, it is a form of communication, yes. Okay. It's a pattern of energy that then, if harmonized with, will create certain results, yes. And since the physical body, or as the way we understand it, breaks down to, I'll just say, subatomic particles and whatnot, so each one has its own consciousness and And because the body, physical body is integrated, then it all heals together. It works together. Yeah, okay. Or not if that serves a purpose. Okay. Now, with regard to, again, the belief system in healing, do you understand that even in what you call your allopathic medicinal methodologies, the most powerful form of healing known is the placebo? Yes, yes, yes, yes. In fact, actual drug tests are always measured against the placebo because if the drug is even 5% more effective than the placebo, it's considered extremely effective because the placebo is so effective. Do you understand? Yes, yes. The belief system of the person is the most effective thing, And your medical doctors know that. And that's why in doing their drug testing, because the placebo effect is actually responsible for such a high percentage of healing, even if the drug is a little bit better, that's the only criteria they need to say the drug is effective. Because if it's no better than the placebo, it's not effective. Because the placebo is so effective. The belief system is so much more effective. Make sense? Oh, yeah, yeah. All right. Thank you so much. Thank you. Much love to you. And you as well.