Patterns (Part 2 of 4)

But for now that is congruous enough. Okay. Okay. The last thing I wanted to bring up was I had a dream, I've had a lot of dreams lately, but one that I remember only a snippet of last week. Remember you're having one right now? Yes. All right. So with that in mind, keep going. Okay. I dream that it was a hybrid dream and interaction between a baby and their mother, but it wasn't me being a huge. It wasn't me being a human looking at a hybrid. It was me being a baby looking at a mother. Yes. And it really, I don't know what to make of it. I don't remember anything else but just thinking, wow, are there more of me? Is this just another experiencing, another part of me, experiencing another? Yes, it is that and at the same time recognize that there is a high degree of telempathic connection between the babies and the mothers. And in that sense, you will find as the barriers drop and you become more of yourself, you're going to be able to be a yourself, you're going to be able to literally see through their eyes with telepathic empathy. Oh, okay, okay. That was fun. All right. Does that help you? That helps a lot. Thank you, Bashar. Thank you. Number two. Hello, Bashar. Good day. I wanted to ask you about music, especially music for healing, the frequencies involved, and whether in the listener the music is always subjective or whether there's something whether there's something absolute universal in the frequency for human. It is not so much an absolute, but there is a general consensus to certain vibrations in that you've all agreed to play the game of physical reality and to abide by the understanding that certain frequencies in the overall physical matrix are representative of more alignment and certain frequencies are representative of less alignment. So in that sense there is a general consensus, even though in the sense of the ultimate creation, of existence, it may not really be an absolute. You follow me? Mm-hmm. So, in general, yes, those pieces that exhibit, whether they be in your terms classic or modern, doesn't matter, those pieces that exhibit, again, what you would call more often than not, those cords that are representative in frequency ratio of golden proportions, sacred geometry, and so forth, will be the ones that in general will be the most healing. You understand? Many of the classic composers understood this. Many contemporary composers on your planet also understand this. The idea really, in general, is that when an individual allows themselves to relax into a state that is generally representative of when they feel like themselves the most, they will begin to automatically resonate toward or magnetize themselves toward pieces of music that are representative of their ability to go even further in that direction of being their true, natural, rest, zero point, healthy self. Yes.

contemporary composers on your planet also understand this. The idea really, in general, is that when an individual allows themselves to relax into a state that is generally representative of when they feel like themselves the most, they will begin to automatically resonate toward or magnetize themselves toward pieces of music that are representative of their ability to go even further in that direction of being their true, natural, rest, zero point, healthy self. Yes. Do you think that there is something inherent about particular tones of the scale, for instance, C or G, that have their own particular character? Yes. Again, because of the overall underlying agreement for how the physical reality structure is aligned, then certain tones and certain chords, certain harmonies, do represent a tap into some of the more fundamental and broader-based aspects of the underlying template or matrix of physical reality. Yes. I see. Thank you. And that is why it is, in some senses, no accident, that the idea of see also, in your language, be speaks of broader vision to see. And the note that's the idea that you know, you call. See. There is no accident, innately, intuitively. It was understood that these had to be called certain things to represent in a great way what they did in fact represent vibrational. You follow. I do. Thank you. Does that help you? Yes, thank you. Thank you. You. Good day. Then you. Number two, do you know who you are? All right. Good day. Number one. Hi, Richard. Thank you for being here. It's some of the discussions that's already had happened tonight has caused me to think some more on what I've been having a lot of fun with in the last couple of weeks about. In our scriptures, it says something to the effect. In the beginning was the word and the word was made flesh. Yes. And today I would paraphrase that or reword it and say that it seems more to me like in the beginning was the thought and the thought was made flesh. Well, in a sense, yes. It seems like these... But the word is representative of the idea that we just spoke of. Right. And in the creation of certain resonant vibrations, there is densification and compartmentalization and structure and order to information, which is the same way as saying the word was made flat. Right. But it seems like we are having fun and we've created these bodies for two purposes. One of them is mainly to bring our thoughts into reality literally as a device to help create and manifest in a third-dimensional reality. Yes. Yes. literally to simply feel our thoughts, literally a device where we do, where our thoughts do become flesh. And so my question is, because you told us a long time ago that the body is basically a crystalline structure. Yeah, in a sense.

created these bodies for two purposes. One of them is mainly to bring our thoughts into reality literally as a device to help create and manifest in a third-dimensional reality. Yes. Yes. literally to simply feel our thoughts, literally a device where we do, where our thoughts do become flesh. And so my question is, because you told us a long time ago that the body is basically a crystalline structure. Yeah, in a sense. And yet also you've told us that everything is always and only created in the now. Yes. But yet there's the appearance of, because to me it's like life is about pattern holders. Everything in existence is simply pattern holding. pattern holdings in many different ways for different durations, et cetera, for the experiences of our own selves. Yes. So, and this body, as I recognize, you don't let us use the word tendencies, but we choose to oftentimes recreate or think thoughts over and over again because of the feelings. Yes. Even when they're negative, even when they're painful, we have these tendencies or these choices. In that context, you can allow yourself to recognize. There is nothing incorrect about you. incorrect about using the word tendency as long as you are clear that what it simply implies is that you continually intend. Right. But my question is, so why do we tend to do this? I mean, is it strictly because it's, as I sometimes feel, it's like we develop a taste for Mexican food, sometimes I think we develop a taste for emotional charges from our thoughts. Yes. And we just almost can't stop doing them. Well, for that reason. Yes, because you strongly identify with that particular frequency, and because, as we have explained again, and as is obvious, the nature, as it has been set up of physical reality belief system experiences is that they are ingrained, or if you wish, have a tendency to be mutually exclusive. In other words, any particular belief system you focus on at any given moment will have a tendency in its built-in definition to exclude any other belief system or even the appearance of the ability to change to any other belief system for if it didn't come with that degree of focus, then it would be impossible for you to really experience that belief system as fully as you possibly could. So we can only tune to one frequency at a time. Yes, and so that is the so-called tendency. In that sense, the tendency is built in to the definition of experiencing yourself as physical reality. Because there is a tendency when you focus on one frequency to exclude all others and therefore forget that all others can be experienced. But that's the nature of the game. So there really is no cellular memory?

could. So we can only tune to one frequency at a time. Yes, and so that is the so-called tendency. In that sense, the tendency is built in to the definition of experiencing yourself as physical reality. Because there is a tendency when you focus on one frequency to exclude all others and therefore forget that all others can be experienced. But that's the nature of the game. So there really is no cellular memory? Well, yes, of course there is because again, you create that to exist as an automatic structure so that you do not have to think every moment of the next intention. You imbue yourself, you take advantage of the frequency matrix, the moment, the moment you momentum built into the frequency matrix, and you translate that inertia into things such as DNA and cellular memory, so that you don't have to always remember that you are creating your reality. If you didn't have that, then you would always have to be totally aware in every single moment, and you wouldn't be able to experience the idea of physical reality in the way you do by forgetting. Okay, so we just, we take that basic design, which holds the patterns of our design and creativity so that we don't have to reinvent the wheel every time. Exactly. But we also misuse it or use it to extremes by creating these emotional thoughts and ideas that oftentimes will end up shortening our lives because they're almost... Well, in a sense, yes, although that's not necessarily a misuse since any experience to the overall soul is valid and simply another way of understanding how the matrix can be utilized. But I understand what you mean. Yeah. Sometimes it may not necessarily be... be congruent with the idea of flow and longevity if that is your preference. And so the idea would then to do things that are congruent with that idea or that preference. And going against that would, in some senses, be considered, quote unquote, a misuse, but that's really a very subjective term. So when a person, for example, has a lot of, excuse me, a lot of anger inside and can't seem to release it. It seems to be taking a long time to process this information. Yes. Yes. Then there has simply been built up over time a great degree of inertia. Yes. In the utilization of that matrix in that way. Is there, I mean, obviously there's a lot of things in life. Every, there's so many different approaches to do this, but is there, is there one, like for example, as you know, when I experiment with the chemicals, that one thing they tend to do for me is literally release those imprints for those few hours. They can when used appropriately create certain kinds of unlockings that can allow there to be a switch, yes.

there, I mean, obviously there's a lot of things in life. Every, there's so many different approaches to do this, but is there, is there one, like for example, as you know, when I experiment with the chemicals, that one thing they tend to do for me is literally release those imprints for those few hours. They can when used appropriately create certain kinds of unlockings that can allow there to be a switch, yes. Many individuals can use it that way, although again, individuals may also bring the inertia into that use and again, quote unquote, misuse it in the sense of misunderstand how it could be used to release them, when in fact they then simply use it to reinforce the inertia they already bring to it. Of course, there are many other ways. It can be done in any number of ways. It can be done simply through the idea of the allowance of inspiration, although some individuals will not necessarily believe that it can be done that way and will actually create crises in their life, accidents and such that will allow them to have abrupt changes that will in a sense force them to change abruptly and change their perspective. It is done in any number of clever and interesting ways by your people. Yeah, and I noticed that we have, again, a tendency to or an unwillingness, like sometimes we'll say, well, I'll forgive, but I'll never forget, which to me means really, they're really the same thing. You either do or you don't. But we tend to have to maybe think that we can forgive on a certain level, but we won't forget, and we don't realize that that not forgetting is the same thing as remembering constantly what that pain is. You do not always technically have to forget in order to forgive, but I understand the context in which you meant it. And on that energy level, yes, that is so. So we simply have to be honest with ourselves and recognize that if we are still feeling some pain, we're still choosing to hold that charge or that imprint in place. Because it doesn't really matter what anyone else's intention was, positive or negative, and it doesn't take away the responsibility of their action. But as long as you continue to feel it, then yes, for your own reasons, you are holding on to the charge. That is all right, if that is the experience you want to have, and you can learn. from that experience. And in that sense, pain in and of itself is a valid experience, and it isn't better that you must not experience the pain. It can be a very, very valid and spiritual experience to choose to do so. But yes, you can also allow yourself to recognize that in many cases, holding on to the pain is exactly what an individual may be doing, when in fact they don't necessarily have to.

that experience. And in that sense, pain in and of itself is a valid experience, and it isn't better that you must not experience the pain. It can be a very, very valid and spiritual experience to choose to do so. But yes, you can also allow yourself to recognize that in many cases, holding on to the pain is exactly what an individual may be doing, when in fact they don't necessarily have to. And they may be only holding onto it because of their assumptions and definitions that allow them to have self-invalidation to the point where they do not necessarily believe that anything else can be done nor should be done. Okay. Thank you. And along that line then, because you and I've talked before and I'm fascinated with the recognition that our DNA, for example, is literally not cast in stone, that it is variable and that we can, or especially even our own scientists are recognizing that there are, of the DNA that turn other parts on and off. And that's, is it correct in assuming that?