Patterns (Part 4 of 4)

Being greedy. Being greedy. Why is that not being spiritual? Um... First of all, before you answer, are you certain of your answer? Are you relatively certain that your answer, being greedy, is the answer you want to give in this game? It's the first thing that came up my mind. Alright. So, what is the idea to you that being greedy is not spiritual? It implies evil for me? implies evil, all right? Is that the bigger definition of being not spiritual, evil? Okay, I believe that's the opposite. Sure. The opposite. Oh, I see. All right. Then, in what way is being evil, not being spiritual? I don't believe I'd be on my higher path if I was evil. Are you saying that if you experienced or expressed what you would recognize as acts of evil, that you would not necessarily be doing what you prefer? Is that what you're saying? Yes. And by not doing what you prefer, then you would not be expressing in your mind the idea of your best highest potential spiritual path. Is that what you're saying? Yes. All right. That, in a sense, has truth. But what has that got to do with the idea of whether evil itself is a spiritual act or not just because it's not what you prefer? You have really hit the nail on the head. If you will understand the whole context and the reason for this question, the idea you will see that unfolds from it, is that in a sense, true quote unquote, evil, if there is such a thing, is not being yourself. Not the idea of any arbitrary label of what you deem to be evil or not, but simply that you recognize that a thing or an act or an expression is not you, and yet in that sense you do it. Intentionally, consciously. In some senses, that is the closest you can come to being, quote unquote, non-spiritual. But even that doesn't really get you there. Because there's actually nothing that you can do, nothing that is not in some context capable of being understood in a spiritual way. You follow? Yes. So I'm really trying to understand who I truly am then. you truly are, is whatever are those things that feel like you, that allow you to experience and express your highest joy, highest excitement, highest love, unconditionally, creatively, all those things, that is, in a sense, you in the sense of the holistic you. But everything is you. This is what we said earlier. Even the evil you is you. But the idea of you. of what you typically on your planet call evil is mechanically segregational. It separates, compartmentalizes, limits in a sense. Thus, it is not representative of the holistic you, which is classically more representative of the real true you, since the real you is all that is. You follow that? Yes. So, but that doesn't mean that the evil you is not you.

said earlier. Even the evil you is you. But the idea of you. of what you typically on your planet call evil is mechanically segregational. It separates, compartmentalizes, limits in a sense. Thus, it is not representative of the holistic you, which is classically more representative of the real true you, since the real you is all that is. You follow that? Yes. So, but that doesn't mean that the evil you is not you. Doesn't mean the evil you is not spiritual. Okay. It's simply a recognition on your part that it is not a representative expression of your holistic understanding of being the closest approximation of your true, all that is, fullest self you prefer to be. Make sense? Yes. Does this help to unravel some of these definitional threads for you at all? Yes, it does. Does it allow you to feel more capable of expressing yourself and so dissolving your own hidden agenda to a greater degree? In part, yeah. Right? The other part would be having other people accept it. Well, why? Why is that important? Well, let's say... Oh, I see. Why? Because I need other people to do my job? Well, that may be so, but why do you assume that being yourself definitionally would actually would actually attract individuals who would somehow counter the true you. Why would not the definition of your true self automatically include attracting yourself to other people and attracting other people to you who are in some way, shape or form congruent with your definition of your holistic self? I see. So I'm not truly being myself. You are not truly being yourself if you believe in that sense, so to speak, that the definition of your true self would automatically inherently include something counterproductive. Because then that's its own definition. In that moment, that's being your true self. your true self because that's what you believe your true self is, but it is not really representative of your ideal holistic self because the ideal holistic self would not contain a definition that there could any way shape or form be counter productivity. Right. Doesn't mean that you cannot attract individuals who see things differently, sometimes even contrarily. But you being the holistic self and acting like you know you are the holistic self will never see that as an impediment. We will always see that as a reflection of how you can actually gain more insight into who you are holistically by using them as a positive and constructive reflection of sometimes what you know you are not. That's how you use the opposite to know who you are. You follow? Yes. Is this helping? Yes, it is. And remember, I'll tell you a big secret. May I? Yes, please. Are you sure? Yes. All right. Now, even though we already have said it is always both. So the idea also is to understand, so who is there that needs to accept you but you?

of sometimes what you know you are not. That's how you use the opposite to know who you are. You follow? Yes. Is this helping? Yes, it is. And remember, I'll tell you a big secret. May I? Yes, please. Are you sure? Yes. All right. Now, even though we already have said it is always both. So the idea also is to understand, so who is there that needs to accept you but you? There is nobody else but you. There's not even me. There's just, you're having this conversation with yourself. Okay. You follow me? Yes, I do. So, in that sense, energetically, really, there is no one else but you. but you, and at the same time, there is everyone and all. But how you experience the everyone and all, paradoxically, has to do with truly understanding there is no one else but you. And when you understand it in the appropriate way, there will always be not coldness and callousness, but reverence and respect for the way that the all expresses itself as a reflection of the you that you are, expressing itself as the all that is. Did that make sense? Yes, it did. And at this timing, I will extend to each and every one of you that are not there, our that are not here, unconditional appreciation and love for the co-creation of this inner dialogue that I have had with myself that I have found absolutely wonderful, invigorating, and enlightening, and I will, as we all will, be eternally grateful for your willingness to allow us to create within ourselves the reflection that is all of you, that you have created yourselves to be within us. How did it go? Thank you. Thanks for being here tonight. Have a good night. Thanks for coming.