Part 1
Good evening, Bishar. Andrew, good day. You may have just answered the question I have, but... How synchronous? I'm not sure. I think I missed something. Oh, all right. When I studied Vedic philosophy, what they taught was that we have an eternal spirit that they call the Atman. All right. And that this is what... Well, this is the part of us that is eternal and enduring. And that this is what goes through lifetimes. Yes, that's one way to look at it from a linear perspective. But that our soul... If I understood you correctly, it seems that what you said was that it's our soul that creates our high mind, whereas that belief is that the high mind is always there uncreated. Depends upon what you call the higher mind. I'm calling something the higher mind specifically. as the non-physical portion of the person that you are. Of course you have higher and higher and higher forms of consciousness as well. But I'm not referring to those. I was being specific to the guide as it is leading the physical mind in its specific incarnational experience. So this is all just semantics in many ways. And again, remember, even what we're talking about is just euphemisms and semantics. It's all permission slips. Whether you want to see it linearly, whether you want to say, this is this higher mind, or that's that higher portion of my being, or this is what's eternal, or that's what's eternal, you're just calling out different aspects of one thing anyway. So it doesn't really matter how you wish to look at it. Look at it from what a perspective works for you. That's the real bottom line, the real point of all of this. If what we are saying works for you, use it. If it doesn't, don't. You will attract yourself to whatever. permission slip is geared to your imagination, geared to your frequency. Yes? Yes. So, again, trying to clarify the concept of linear versus nonlinear existence, where does causality come in? What about karma? If everything exists now, then where is the opportunity to... The opportunity for what you call karma is in the connection? is in the connections that you make in any life that you believe need to be made to create an experience of balancing. But one thing doesn't come before the other. One doesn't cause the other. You can arrange these things in any way you want. To create any kind of sensation of causality, any kind of sensation of karma or balance. It's all just an experience of arrangement. It's just an orchestration. It's just an idea. It's just an experience. Look at it as a film story. strip because you have that technology on your planet. There are different frames on a strip of film, yes? Right.
Part 2
cause the other. You can arrange these things in any way you want. To create any kind of sensation of causality, any kind of sensation of karma or balance. It's all just an experience of arrangement. It's just an orchestration. It's just an idea. It's just an experience. Look at it as a film story. strip because you have that technology on your planet. There are different frames on a strip of film, yes? Right. Well, you play them in a certain order to create a sense of continuity, to create an experience of going from the past to the future through the present. But really, if you're the projectionist, you can look at any frame in any order you want. You could rearrange that movie. You could edit it in any order you want. You could make a whole different story out of it by rearranging those frames. It's all in that sense arbitrary, but it's all relevant for whatever story you need to live, whatever experience you need to have. So you create the idea of karma by making connections, by rearranging the frames in a certain way, because now you want to explore the concept of balancing out your karma. But you're the author of the karma. Yes? Right, okay. Does that make sense? Yes, yes, that's really helpful. Oh, all right. Right?