Faith (Part 1 of 3)

All right, I'll say, how are you all this evening of your time as you create time to exist? Perfect. Thank you. So, allow me before we begin the eye of sharing to address something we have been discussing over a little late that we feel does pertain still to many of the ideas, many of the time, questions that you have formed within your reality. The idea that we have discussed what you call faith recognize, as we will put very simply, that many times when individuals creating the discussion with us, with other individuals, the topic of faith, they understand to some degree that it is the mechanism by which they can create the reality desire but in this way as you have created cycle repetition for your thousands of years of the habit of separation of yourself from the all that is that you are many times even when exploring the idea of integration you will start out from a separated point of view or separated approach therefore many times even though you will recognize that faith is the mechanism that will allow you to create the reality that you desire to experience it. Once you get to that point, the next thing you usually will be found to say is, well, faith in what? Now understand it does not matter. The idea is that faith in and of itself is the mechanism. It does not matter faith in what. This is why your faith can create any type of reality. Faith in whatever you believe in, is what your reality is about. Therefore, allow me to simplify that that is why in what you call your biblical literature, with the idea of the individual you call your Christ, you will recognize that when that individual defined the reason for the abrupt change of any physical manifestation in the reality, then he ascribed it to the world of faith but did not say faith in what? Simply that your faith is responsible for this change in your health, in this, in this, in that, your faith has saved you, quote, unquote. It is a description that it is the faith in and of itself, that is the activation mechanism, and whatever belief you plug into that faith will be the reality that you experience. Therefore, There is no need to complicate the idea by saying, well, yes, I understand it is faith, but faith is what? Faith is what? Simply know that faith is in and of itself the exercise. It is in and of itself the action. It is simply the willingness to know that you are the creator of your reality, on whatever level, you have created yourself to realize this. No need to continue to continue to continue. to create a need for another process to discover what it is you are supposed to have faith in. The idea of faith in faith is what it takes. You follow me? Yes. Oh, yes.

is in and of itself the action. It is simply the willingness to know that you are the creator of your reality, on whatever level, you have created yourself to realize this. No need to continue to continue to continue. to create a need for another process to discover what it is you are supposed to have faith in. The idea of faith in faith is what it takes. You follow me? Yes. Oh, yes. The idea of simply knowing that you know is all it takes to know whatever you need to know. For you will allow with that activation of faith, your life will be allowed to bring to you, to attract to you, to attract you too, whatever situations are necessary to reflect the path you chose to be. And then you can simply automatically act upon what you give yourself, for what you attract with your faith, with your knowingness, will never be a struggle nor a strain. You will find yourself expressing it. expressing and exercising the ease of creation with effortlessness by simply acting upon what you attract to yourself in all good faith that it is representative of the life you chose and not an interruption within it. Now do you follow that idea? Sure. Sure. You then you. Yes, I think it's sort of relates to what you just say. relates to what you just said. I'd like to share briefly that ever since you first mentioned the idea of becoming one's future self, imagining what one's future self is like, and in becoming it, I have been practicing it, and I'd like to share with everybody that it really works very well. And I have suggested to a lot of friends, and you can say it to anybody without going into a lot of metaphysical things. It's a very simple thing. Right. I thought I'd like to share that with everybody. Thank you very much for that creation, and your willingness to recognize your own idea of acceleration. Thank you. I have a quick question. Voyager 2 is going to be passing the Uranus Center in two days, and I was wondering if you knew, if you could tell us anything that we don't know yet that will be discovered in two days. Do not want to take all night. Understand that in the same manner that your probes discover much with regard to your other planetary bodies, you will discover that much yet again. There are many ideas of what you call a new understanding of the mechanics of planetary formation that will become clear, but also there will be in your terms of new questions that you did not know existed this. I'm sure, that's true. Well, just as a very simple example, right now, they know that their nine wings and five moons. And they expect that they will get...

you will discover that much yet again. There are many ideas of what you call a new understanding of the mechanics of planetary formation that will become clear, but also there will be in your terms of new questions that you did not know existed this. I'm sure, that's true. Well, just as a very simple example, right now, they know that their nine wings and five moons. And they expect that they will get... There is the potential for the probe in the trajectory that it is on to see at least two or three more moons. Okay, thank you. I just sort of be an interesting thing to have you comment on. Oh, fine. Thank you. Yes, I'll be sure. I have, for the last few months, my right eye has been blurry, and I can, first of all, I wanted to share the purpose that I feel behind that is that it's that it enabled me to kind of move into another reality while still being here at the same time. All right, very good. You are becoming bifocal. Okay, but I also get scared about it, because my, I think I've mentioned to you my fear of blindness and All right. So that I... But understand that the idea of your fear of blindness, in a sense, was a precognition of the symbol that you would choose now to give yourself this opportunity to become bifocal. Only then, from your separated point of view in the precognition, did you assume that it meant literal blindness? You follow me? Yes. Okay. And I feel that this is a temporary condition. Yes. It just feels like there's a... like a little film over my eye. Yes. When you follow your eyes and the rest of you will catch up, and then you will be vibrating equally once again in another density. Okay. That's exciting. Now, is there, I also get, ever since I was a teenager, I've also had aches at times around the eyes. I don't know if it's in the muscles of the eyes or if it's my sinuses or something, but there's not really a hair. It's not really a headache that we think about as a headache. It's like an ache around the eyes. It is sinus connected to some degree. In this way, it will simply be once again symbolic of the changes in the shifting in pressures within the bodily system as regard to the energy flow that you have created for yourself with regard to who you think you are and the connections you have made to other consciousness on other levels.

that we think about as a headache. It's like an ache around the eyes. It is sinus connected to some degree. In this way, it will simply be once again symbolic of the changes in the shifting in pressures within the bodily system as regard to the energy flow that you have created for yourself with regard to who you think you are and the connections you have made to other consciousness on other levels. Many times you will find that it will be I'll say symbolically natural and not unusual in your society at this time for those that have very strong relations within their consciousness to the idea of other consciousness outside their own planetary system to create the symbol of having breathed alien air and being used to alien pressures, alien energies, many times this will simply manifest in your society as conditions of pressure within the sinus area, as it will reflect the idea of the shifting of pressure in your body to that extent. Follow me. Yes, is that the same as the ear aches that I've had in my left ear on... It is connected, yes. Okay, now is there anything I can do to alleviate to make myself more comfortable with these aches that I have and also with that my right eye being blurry, is there anything that I can do physically to... Our perception is that temperature would be of assistance, warmth of temperature. The idea of allowing the entire area here, here, and here, to experience warmth, not too hot, but warmth, all of the same time, to even out the pressure systems. Okay, I started rinsing my right eye with clear, um, sparkless water. And is that a good idea? It feels a lot better. Should I... It's up to you. You don't not have to warm that. But simply you may immerse one of your cloth in the warm water and apply to the entire area equally. At the same time, take not cold, but a cool cloth and apply it to the back of your neck. Okay. All right. Thank you. about 10 minutes. Okay. Thank you. Cool in the back, right? Cool in the back. Right. Yeah. A couple questions. To what degree in terms of clarity of perceiving events is your spiritual vision open? Understand, first of all, that there is no such thing as predicting the future. No, no, I'm not talking about predicting the future. I'm talking about seeing now. Yeah. And like in past things, you've said to people that there have been things connected from their past that you've seen which are causes or linkups with present circumstances. And I want, I'd like to know to what degree of accuracy is that open within... To no degree of accuracy whatsoever. 100% validity, yes. Okay, all right.

predicting the future. No, no, I'm not talking about predicting the future. I'm talking about seeing now. Yeah. And like in past things, you've said to people that there have been things connected from their past that you've seen which are causes or linkups with present circumstances. And I want, I'd like to know to what degree of accuracy is that open within... To no degree of accuracy whatsoever. 100% validity, yes. Okay, all right. So then if your knowledge of the past is 100% valid, then that tells me that it's 100% valid, then that tells me that it's 100% what occurred. One moment. Accuracy and validity are two separate things. Alright, so then if you are then are linking up a past situation with... One moment, do you understand the difference? No, then, I don't. Recognize this. You are creating the past and the future from the present. What any individual co-create with me, what I co-create, with any individual is valid. For that individual in the co-creation, for whatever reasons they have co-created that, the idea of accuracy in terms of representing something that physiologically happened in your historical concept is not always necessarily present, to allow there to be reality to the experience that is being co-created. Okay, so... Let me see if I can get my question here, put back together again. From time to time, we will be able, from time to time, we will be able, when discussing such an idea with you, to point out whether or not we perceive that it happened physiologically or not. What entails, then, being able to perceive it physiologically? The purpose for the co-creation. And if the idea. If the idea of making a physiological connection in terms of the accuracy you request is either, in the overall sense, interferive, or does not really exactly pertain to the reason for why the whole concept has been created, then it will not funnel through us. Okay, so is that by individual choice or is that just sort of a curve? Otherwise, can you do it by choice, if you will, by choice if you wish. Allow me to explain in this way. We have chosen for ourselves to interact with you in a whole concept that we feel represents the validity of the experience you are requesting. Okay, but that's just subjective, yes. Everything is. Everything is. There is no such thing really as objectivity. Recognize, therefore, that it is not so much that we specifically screen any information at any particular moment, but that we have already created the idea that if it will not be of service, it will automatically be screened and kept from our own knowingness in the interaction, even though maybe we will know about it later. Okay, so then my next question then would be, this is maybe blasphemous, but... Blasphemer? I decided today that I'm going to not really care about... Very good.

specifically screen any information at any particular moment, but that we have already created the idea that if it will not be of service, it will automatically be screened and kept from our own knowingness in the interaction, even though maybe we will know about it later. Okay, so then my next question then would be, this is maybe blasphemous, but... Blasphemer? I decided today that I'm going to not really care about... Very good. Other people may be being upset or whatever, but I decided to test you. Test me! Alright! Get nervous now! No, no, no, only because I decided that if something is true, then I should be able to investigate and doubt. Well, all right, that is up to you, but what is truth? Well, truth is something which, I guess you could define it in many, many ways. Right? For number one, truth is something that that the energy of spirit is manifested within it and there's nothing covering it. All right. It's a bit purer than something that has covering, some kind of covering on it. We understand your terminology. The reason that I would ask this or even be in the frame of mind is because I think to myself, well, I've been coming here a couple times and been asking questions and sometimes personal questions, deep questions within myself. And I would like to understand more of the source that reflects back these questions that I put my face in through the medium of view, so therefore I, you know, I like to test you. All right, but understand therefore that you are then testing yourself. Oh, no doubt, no doubt. All right. But you're on a hot face, too. It feels very cool to me. Recognize, I have already said that neither am I in the desire to nor can I ever prove anything to anyone. This is not my function. Yes, no, I understand that. I understand that. All right. And my desire for questioning is not at all to lessen any of the value than the current here at all. It's just, um, what it is, what it is, man? Do whatever you wish. Okay. What did I do today? I mean, what did I do today? Now understand this. I, at this moment, I, at this moment, do not know. Recognize the idea of what you are asking in this way. First of all, before we get back to that question. Many times in your society, when you perceive the idea now, when you begin to examine the ideas that you call telepathy, extrasensory perception, and all the psychic manifesto, manifestations of spirituality, of astralness, and all the different labels that you give to this experience that you sense exists in your society. You are still many times creating your viewpoint of this phenomenon, if you wish to call it that, from the methodology that you have used all along to define your reality.

the idea now, when you begin to examine the ideas that you call telepathy, extrasensory perception, and all the psychic manifesto, manifestations of spirituality, of astralness, and all the different labels that you give to this experience that you sense exists in your society. You are still many times creating your viewpoint of this phenomenon, if you wish to call it that, from the methodology that you have used all along to define your reality. Now, you may call this, if you will, at this time, what you usually refer to as scientific methodology, the creation of a series of questions or tests to create what you feel to be a certain proof. But recognize, first of all, that science, even though it has set itself up to be so, is in no way shape or form, the final arbiter on what is real and what is not. first of all, understand that. Even though science in and of itself says that it is, all right, I'm not finished. Now recognize, therefore, that when it goes about seeking to understand things, it does not, it will usually still apply the methodology it is used to using to every new thing it encounters. Now, this is the transformational life. transformational life, you are beginning to bridge the idea of physicality and non-physicality. And in many ways, even though some of your modern physics has begun to understand the necessity of rearranging its equations to include some aspects of non-physicality, what it has yet to understand is that the physical science will not be able to come up with a methodology to define non-physical science. And in this way, you will still find, therefore, that from time to time, when science seeks to explore, to experiment, to test, to prove something, when it is still putting its own habitual scientific methodology upon that idea, it will then create what it thinks is an accurate definition of how science thinks this new idea should work. And when it goes about testing it, we'll apply the parameters that it thinks represents the way in which such a subject should be tested to get the results you think you want. But recognize this. There is much you do not understand about why things like telepathy and psychic functioning work. Many times, in scientific point of view, Something is valid or not valid depending upon how many times it can be repeated under controlled conditions. Now, recognize that the very essence of that type of experimentation is canceling to the very essence of the function of psychic ability. May I say something there on that? Yes, if you will let me continue. Yes, sure, sure. Sure. You put so many ideas out and I just want to be able to feed back and understand. All right. One thing that you said about the objective, now since objectivity then is really another or a secondary phase to subjectivity, it is an extension of subjectivity. Yes.

the very essence of the function of psychic ability. May I say something there on that? Yes, if you will let me continue. Yes, sure, sure. Sure. You put so many ideas out and I just want to be able to feed back and understand. All right. One thing that you said about the objective, now since objectivity then is really another or a secondary phase to subjectivity, it is an extension of subjectivity. Yes. Then if you're in tune with subjectivity, which is primary, yes. And more unintuitive, then knowing the objective must be right there too. Very good. But understand in this way that knowing you are subjective means you know that you get the result that you design the experiment for. Therefore, with regard to how your science usually now understands the non-physicalized origin of psychic ability or telepathy, the way it designs the experiments to test these things have nothing to do with the understanding of why those things work. things work. And basically what we are saying is this. When you realize that psychic manifestation and telepathy and all of these ideas is not strictly in your terminology a mental phenomena but an emotional phenomenon and a belief system phenomena, then you will understand that the circumstance The circumstances, the circumstances in which you can then, so to speak, prove the existence of psychic phenomena are not the standard laboratory conditions of sterility. They are circumstances that are emotional, interactive, congruent with life itself. It is an active. science, the science of mind, the science of understanding bonds of consciousness. It is an active science. What standard classical science on your planet seeks to do is stop a process so they can pick it apart to understand it. But stopping the process completely erases any evidence that they wish to find. that they wish to find. Therefore recognize that because it is an emotional bond, an active bond, a feeling bond, a living bond, a living bond, usually when there is occurrences of psychic knowingness, of teleppp as you say, they will occur when there is a great need, desire, excitement, emotion to know these things. They can occur from time to time, as you say, spot. time, as you say spontaneously, just by saying, well, how much change have I got in my pocket? Well, 37 cents. Well, yes, you're right. But understand that those in your terms, at this point in your society, are the exceptions. And usually not repeatable. But science cannot understand why they are not repeatable. It is not repeatable because who cares how much change. You have in your pocket when you can reach in and find out for yourself in a practice. everyday method. The idea of what you did today is not something that you are radiating in such a way that comes across to me as something that allows us to be in love with each other about the sharing.

cannot understand why they are not repeatable. It is not repeatable because who cares how much change. You have in your pocket when you can reach in and find out for yourself in a practice. everyday method. The idea of what you did today is not something that you are radiating in such a way that comes across to me as something that allows us to be in love with each other about the sharing. But what would occur, though, you see, if you were to know exactly what I did today, it would, um, put it this way, it would put me at that point above just a, you know, you know, in religion and all the religions that I've come across, usually there is a source, a knowledge source, or a point of emanation of information. And to a great degree, most of the people that follow, they don't inspect the information because it becomes like a whirlwind of, hey, let's get into this, I believe it feels great. It's more fun to believe that's a question. Because when you question, you have to find out about it, and sometimes it's All right. So if you were to know what I did today, what it would do for me is it put me in tune with you on a okay. All right. We understand what you are saying, but understand, again, it is not our purpose to put you anywhere. Now, recognize also that what you are defining as these individuals with regard to their religions and following such an idea without questioning. The idea of following in that way is not knowing. Right. Therefore, the analogy in that way does not hold. The recognition is that if they were not following but knowing, then they would simply know they do not need to follow and would also know that they do not need to create question. They would simply understand. Now, again, the idea is backwards. Allowing yourself to be already on this idea of equal share. of equal sharing will allow for the manifestation of the type of telepathy that I experience in my own society all the time. Not the other way around. Not making it well, if this happens, then I will go for this. Because you say, what you are saying is that I want to believe in this, and so if this happens, then I will believe in this. But you are asking me, therefore, to do something that will, in a sense affect your choice of belief. Well, it's not even a match... Now, one moment. One moment. One moment. Therefore, this is what I offer you in exchange for what you want from me. I cannot and will not prove anything to you in this way. However, I will assist you to prove that such a thing exists for yourself. Well, I know it. Then what is the point? I'm talking to you. So what?

sense affect your choice of belief. Well, it's not even a match... Now, one moment. One moment. One moment. Therefore, this is what I offer you in exchange for what you want from me. I cannot and will not prove anything to you in this way. However, I will assist you to prove that such a thing exists for yourself. Well, I know it. Then what is the point? I'm talking to you. So what? Only because you're a source of information and questioning for myself. You are the source. I am a reflection. Understand that that is the only function that I provide. Not a source of information, a reflection of you as the source. Period. What you hear from me is reflective of what you are willing to be. Now, for example, there have been opportunities many times. In your terminology for me to know what someone did during the course of a day. But that is not because they need to know in the terms you are asking, but simply because they recognize themselves as the source they are simply involved. involved emotionally in the conversation and because they are so open with that idea and not shutting themselves off pro-offering a test, which means you are hiding things, then it is simply there to be picked up upon emotionally. And many times we can read that emotionality. When no one is thinking that they must test for that emotionality is only when it can be read. Therefore, when you leave it. When you least expect it is when it will work the best. Therefore, our suggestion is that if we simply continue to interact, there will be more opportunities for us to simply pick up on the creation of what you are and reflect that back to you if it is pertinent to what it is you are exploring about yourself. Okay. That's cool. Thank you. Can I think up on that further? Yes. Is what's happening here, is he looking for having faith in his belief? I ask him. Is that what you're looking for? Okay, I'm trying to understand what you were talking about, about faith and belief, and you're making a differentiation between them. All right. Belief is simply one of the facets of the personality structure, of which the other two are emotionality and thought. Faith is the activation through the personality of the knowingness of the higher consciousness. You follow me? Yes. Now we discussed belief as being composed of two aspects. That is two pretend. One more, the first pretend and pretending that I'm not pretending it. And that is the way of creating a belief. You can change a belief. Yes, that way. Is there some other way of understanding belief other than that? other than that? Belief self is a reflection many times of the combined personality constructs idea of itself through the ego.

Now we discussed belief as being composed of two aspects. That is two pretend. One more, the first pretend and pretending that I'm not pretending it. And that is the way of creating a belief. You can change a belief. Yes, that way. Is there some other way of understanding belief other than that? other than that? Belief self is a reflection many times of the combined personality constructs idea of itself through the ego. And therefore will reflect what you think and feel and believe the method should be. should be for you as a person to explore the situations that your higher consciousness has given you to explore. You follow me. I can't say that I do. All right. Simply belief is what will allow your personality to create something to sense. through the senses it has created it. It is what creates the reflection of how you consider your person and what you consider your person to be. Follow that. As for example, I'm here in this room, I'm looking at it through these eyes, I'm seeing you, I'm seeing other things. I'm seeing other things. Is that an example of belief? Yes. And the way you are seeing them defines the type of belief. How would faith fit into this? Faith is simply the knowingness that this is all a part of you. A part of you. Yes. Faith. is the mechanism of allowing you to tap and be congruent with the higher consciousness as awareness that this is you. Your belief allows you to experience it as not you. Your entire personality, emotion and thought and belief, co-creates the reality that this is not you. Faith. know this is you. Very good. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Yes. A belief need not necessarily be intellectualized. I mean, we have a lot of beliefs that we've never even considered were beliefs. We just kind of walk around in our reality with the beliefs, yeah. That seems to me that if we were to intellectualize a belief, we'd have to realize that the belief does not contain a consideration consideration that it is not so. I think doesn't faith also, if you would have to intellectualize the idea of faith, the consideration that it is not so or that it can't happen or something like that. In another sense, yes. Just absent. Yes. This is why we say that you will find that in your terminology of so-called hierarchy, it is knowingness and then belief and then emotion and then thought. For belief will retain to some degree some of the aspect of knowingness in physical terms, and that will be one of them, the idea that it does not consider itself to not be. Okay. Would faith then be kind of a component of knowingness, or would you say it is knowingness? Faith, as you define it in your physical reality is the realization of knowingness. Okay.

then belief and then emotion and then thought. For belief will retain to some degree some of the aspect of knowingness in physical terms, and that will be one of them, the idea that it does not consider itself to not be. Okay. Would faith then be kind of a component of knowingness, or would you say it is knowingness? Faith, as you define it in your physical reality is the realization of knowingness. Okay. There are some things that I have total certainty that I know. Yes. And other things that I just kind of accept on faith that I, well, I know it's going to happen, although I don't know what the circumstances will be. All right. Basically, yes, same thing. But when you say, well, I know and I accept on faith, it is not so much that it is dissimilar, but you are still making somewhat of a recognition of the mechanism of the knowingness channeling through into physical reality, which is a separation from the knowingness. Right. Definitely acknowledges the high- Yes, you're simply feeling the flow of the knowingness, watching the mechanism work, aware of the mechanism itself. Got it. Thank you. Now that I still have your attention. I'm interested in understanding what the 11 dimensions that our physical reality is made up of. So I understand correctly that we have our three X, XYZ dimensions. Are there three additional spatial dimensions that are kind of curled up, six, additional special dimension? In a sense, yes, the idea of the multiverse can be looked at as what you call enfolded. Okay, this comes out a super string theory. Yes. Okay. Then what are the remaining two dimensions, plus and minus time? Time will be there. Now understand the idea that we have defined as what we call the template structure. I do understand that. All right, in this way, the six phases and the five points adding up to the idea of 11 will simply, yes, point to the idea to some degree of different directions. But when you get beyond the idea of physical space and physical time, then in and of itself the direction in which things actually are contained is not even so much a direction, as it is, let us say, a bias. if you will. All right. That time plus n minus would still be one dimension. Yes. Okay. Well then that covers 10 dimensions. What's the 11th? It is the totality of the concept in a synergistic fashion before it goes on to the next level. Have our scientists come upon this thought in their own? In their own... Some, yes. So I'm wondering if they are aware that we are living in an 11-dimension reality, I have not found anybody to define all 11 dimensions, but I've seen within super string theory the three spatial dimensions, the six curled in spatial dimensions, the single dimension of time, and then nobody's mentioned what the 11th dimension is.

to the next level. Have our scientists come upon this thought in their own? In their own... Some, yes. So I'm wondering if they are aware that we are living in an 11-dimension reality, I have not found anybody to define all 11 dimensions, but I've seen within super string theory the three spatial dimensions, the six curled in spatial dimensions, the single dimension of time, and then nobody's mentioned what the 11th dimension is. All right, now, to some degree. Again, I will say this will be difficult in the terminology available to me, through the physical channel. But if you wish to give it a definition in those terms, allow me to define it in this way. It is the recognition, paradoxical though this will sound, of the structure that exists within a point. Okay. All right. Kind of, almost an inverse space reality. Sort of, kind of. Kind of, kind of, like I said. Like I said. Yes. Okay, thank you. Now, one moment. Understand that very recently there has been a new awareness, a new understanding that very recently there has been a new awareness, a new understanding, that will allow for what you have been calling the idea of understanding all of these dimensions and the forces, so to speak, within it as a unified field, as a unified onness, as a homogenous whole. you have just learned of the idea that gravity in and of itself has another type of structure to it that allows it to be, in your terms, coming and going simultaneously, rather than unidirectional as you have for so long considered it to be. This, in and of itself, is now being separated out as an other force, but will very shortly be reintegrated when there is the understanding of what gravity represents. It is not like, in its manifested sense, the other things that you recognize as fundamental forces. This new clue, which is being called hypercharge in your society, will allow them to understand the simultaneous forces. simultaneous nature and more awareness of what they have for some time called quantum interconnectedness, but not have been able to make sense of in what you call mathematical or practical terms. This will allow them to see how such a thing is possible simultaneously, and it will lead them to rewrite the structure of the mathematics, inventing a new mathematical relationship that will then include more of the idea. more of the idea of consciousness. Are you saying that when they blend the ideas of gravity and hypercharge, that will be, in a sense, factoring in the idea of consciousness? It will be the first step toward realizing that. Okay. Thank you. Basha? All right. Okay. Hi, I'm so glad to see you again. I'm sorry. I don't see you. I'm so glad to be here with you. I do. couple questions.

the idea. more of the idea of consciousness. Are you saying that when they blend the ideas of gravity and hypercharge, that will be, in a sense, factoring in the idea of consciousness? It will be the first step toward realizing that. Okay. Thank you. Basha? All right. Okay. Hi, I'm so glad to see you again. I'm sorry. I don't see you. I'm so glad to be here with you. I do. couple questions. I'd like to tell you a couple of images I had in several different dreams, but all in one night, and see if you can work with me on this, possibly. I woke up in the dream I was on a crew, I was on a ship, and with a crew of people. It seemed to be the same people I was in the movie crew with that I'm working on now. May I interrupt you? Yes. Are you going to go through these descriptions already knowing what all of this means for you? I don't know what they mean. We will see. Well, I have done this before, you and I. You will go through your entire illumination, and then when we discuss it with it, you will say, well, yes, I knew that. Well, of course I know it, but I like to have you reflected back sometimes. You know it consciously. I don't know it consciously. All right, we will see. I mean, I know bits and pieces, but it's not interesting. Oh, here it comes, bits and pieces. I know, I love you, even though you can express my expression sometimes. That we find to be impossible. I know. Something we do on earth sometimes be ditchy. Um, okay. I was going through. She liked that. Yes. I was going to do. We were going someplace. It was very, very, very, very cold. The coldest place in the entire universe. universe. Oh. What it would be like, okay? And twice in that night, twice in that dream, I woke up crying. I mean, physically crying, and my family and I woke up crying. One, I was having a conversation with the being that I know you know I'm talking about, the woman being that I was playing with. And the other time was on the crew, and I wasn't sure why I was crying. And the same dream, and it's all sounds crazy, they were feeding us lobsters. And for some reason I thought the lobster had something to do with the pie DNA. high and then later in the sequence of the screen. Why? Now, see, I don't know what any of that means. Oh, hogwash. Why not allow them to be literal? Someone's going to see me lobster? What? I don't know. Symbolically literal. As you have already defined and described the feelings that those symbols gave to you. The idea for yourself, first of all, that you know that you are involved in a process with many individuals.

then later in the sequence of the screen. Why? Now, see, I don't know what any of that means. Oh, hogwash. Why not allow them to be literal? Someone's going to see me lobster? What? I don't know. Symbolically literal. As you have already defined and described the feelings that those symbols gave to you. The idea for yourself, first of all, that you know that you are involved in a process with many individuals. That you know in your mentality it represents a journey to somewhere you think you need to get to. The idea that you will be fed from the bounty of your own abundance along the trip. And the idea that it is not a gamble. It is not a gamble to do so. Well, if I knew that, you certainly put it in a nice turn. One moment. Understand that you have had the ability to know all of this in the way I have defined but there is one thing you are creating for your self. The idea of the coldness is symbolic of what you call superconductivity. The idea that the force can flow faster when the molecular structure of something is put into a crystalline matrix. This, however, does not need to exemplify itself outwardly. in terms of being hyperactive. If you would but relax, which is the idea of centering, which is what the crying was for. Yes. Yes. Yes. You were centering from what you perceive to be a negative experience. And it is only your symbol that you are in the overall. in the overall understanding of the trip you are on, still attempting to get out and help push the boat. Now if you would allow yourself in your terms to slow down a bit. I feel like I'm so slow already. I know you feel that way. But if you would but listen to yourself, You discharge so much information so rapidly that many times it is not an allowance for the individuals you are discharging too to assimilate at their own rate. If you are a part of the crews, then understand that you are all going to get there on the same boat at the same time. Keep the young and be left out of them. No. Understand simply that you can enjoy the abundance that you can partake of on the cruise. You are not gambling. And in this way, simply, is on the same boat. They will not disappear. Therefore, enjoy the programs that are offered to you on the cruise. Take some time off, yes. You are on vacation with these people. They do not want to be reminded of all the work. follow me? They do not want to think about paperwork. They do not want to know all the little details. They do not want to be bombarded with information. That is why they left on this cruise.

will not disappear. Therefore, enjoy the programs that are offered to you on the cruise. Take some time off, yes. You are on vacation with these people. They do not want to be reminded of all the work. follow me? They do not want to think about paperwork. They do not want to know all the little details. They do not want to be bombarded with information. That is why they left on this cruise. Therefore, if you are on this cruise with them, join them by simply moving at the same rate that the entire ship is looking. ship is moving. You do not have to get out and push. You do not have to jump into a rowboat with a line and begin to roll faster to pull the boat. It is still going to move at its own face. On the current it has squarely placed itself in the middle of that sea of consciousness. Left its port at exactly the right time with everyone on board and will arrive at its next port at its next port. support at exactly the right time.