Habits (Part 2 of 3)

The family, I met her folks for the first time, they don't know me because of the pending marriage. They're very uncomfortable when I'm there. I've talked with her fiance several times and he is exceptionally uncomfortable. Continue. He has asked me not to come back, not to contact her. Part of me feels as though I'm abandoning her if I don't contact her, at least to allow her to know what's happening. Does a part of you feel like you're abandoning yourself if you don't? Yes, yes. I'm torn between going back and not going back and not worrying about hassling with it and everybody else. I mean, the family's had enough with everything that's happened. God knows I've had enough happen in the past. No one wants any hassles. But there's this other thing. There's this other feeling. She's happy when she sees me. All right. I know she enjoys that now. I really, I don't know what to do. I'm really torn about it. Would you comment on it? Well, simply you can recognize, first and foremost, that you are, no matter what the definition of your physical proximity, always interacting, always. Now, if you find that the idea of the physical proximity The idea of the physical proximity attracts a creation on your parts of the idea of displeasure from others. It may simply be the idea that you can know you are interacting anyway, and not necessarily choose to continue to create the idea of dissension from them. But in this way, also do recognize, it may be an opportunity for you to recognize that if you both wish to continue to co-create the idea of the interaction in the manner that you most enjoy, then in that sense, it does not matter what they think. Does she enjoy it? Yes, to my knowledge, she does. And do you? Yes. Then what does anyone else have to say about it? That has been my thought process for a long time. But I, the other part of me, the plays the devil's advocate says, Oh, the devil's advocate. Well, I'm trying to be fair about it. I'm trying to be fair about this situation. Why do you have to try to be fair? Why do you not know that you are a fair being? That you are functioning within integrity? So what? What does that got to do with what he knows to be true for himself? Do you know you are a fair being? Do you know you are functioning within integrity? Yes. Then why not allow you?

about it. I'm trying to be fair about this situation. Why do you have to try to be fair? Why do you not know that you are a fair being? That you are functioning within integrity? So what? What does that got to do with what he knows to be true for himself? Do you know you are a fair being? Do you know you are functioning within integrity? Yes. Then why not allow you? Why not allow yourself to simply understand that once again, you can know that there is an interaction going on right now, no matter what, your physical proximity, and you can be just as powerful, being not physically present as you can be physically present, and at the same time, you can recognize that if that individual wishes to co-create with you, physical proximity, and you wish to co-create that with her, then it is your opportunity in this way to do so if that is what excites you the most, if that is what excites her the most, if you are functioning within integrity with each other in that way. And also simply recognize that both of you together may be allowing all those others who are giving you all of the judgment to come to some terms about themselves by seeing something reflected in the two of you. For what reason should they judge you? Perhaps you can't. a reflection for them to come to terms and cease judging themselves. Is that possible without the situation really taking off and blowing up and escalating into something it shouldn't be? It is possible, yes. But again, recognize that if you simply know what is true for you, even if it, quote, unquote, does go that way, you will never feel it. But again, do recognize that you are able to say that you are able to feel it. You are able to do anything you want from anywhere and any when. So again, it is up to you. And if you feel that within your integrity and your conscious choice, that you would prefer in this way to simply know you are interacting with her as you need to, no matter where you are, then physical proximity is not necessarily something you have to insist upon. But then again, it is up to you to feel out the situation for yourself, and simply function through the integrity you know you are utilizing. See the situation from your vantage point right now. Do not necessarily assume that I have a greater vantage point that you do, for it is your personal life. And it is not always the case that ideas are more apparent to us than they are to you. And right now, such is the case. There is nothing that I have an overview of that you are not privy to.

you know you are utilizing. See the situation from your vantage point right now. Do not necessarily assume that I have a greater vantage point that you do, for it is your personal life. And it is not always the case that ideas are more apparent to us than they are to you. And right now, such is the case. There is nothing that I have an overview of that you are not privy to. Since you are dealing with such an intensification of focus of the energy, you are very well aware of all the factors involved as many as I am, as many as I allow myself to be aware of based upon the idea of not interfering with your choices. Thus, it is totally in your hands. in your hands, overview notwithstanding. If you were in my situation. If, if, if, if, what parallel reality are we talking about? That if has nothing to do with what is. What is, is, is, if has nothing to do with it. That's correct, but you've said, you've just said that you see the same thing. things I see. No more, no less. Okay. Knowing that. Okay. What would you feel would be the best possible choice at this time? All right, all right, all right. One hint. And that is it, all right? Yes, no, maybe. An in-depth hit? One hint of my definition. My definition, one. All right. Take it or leave it. In that case, I'll take it. I would, oh this is fun. I would, if, if I were in your shoes, which would not fit me very well. I would open complete and total communication. communication with everyone as to why they feel the way they choose to feel. I would talk with everyone and explore in depth what everyone is choosing to feel and why they think they are feeling what they are feeling. So that I can function with my integrity and integrate the entire interaction within me by talking to every portion of the interaction. the interaction. If you're aware of the situation as I am, you know that I have attempted that. Attempted. Well, you know that I have done that with at least one of the individuals of all. At least one? I said every. I said every. Every. Who knows what talking to one will do for another? You follow me. You follow me. Yes. You do not sound too happy. Do you think it will be a great deal of trouble to talk to all? It's not so much that I think it will be a great deal of trouble. It's the idea that I can reasonably project. Ah, ah. Stopping before you start, are you? Planning the outcome in it best? The outcome that I was thinking about was certainly one of the options of the outcome. Well, yes, but you don't have to prefer it, do you?

will be a great deal of trouble to talk to all? It's not so much that I think it will be a great deal of trouble. It's the idea that I can reasonably project. Ah, ah. Stopping before you start, are you? Planning the outcome in it best? The outcome that I was thinking about was certainly one of the options of the outcome. Well, yes, but you don't have to prefer it, do you? You do not have to act like that is the most expected outcome that could happen. Do you? Do you? That's correct. Where is your faith? My, my mind. Comes and goes. Where does it go? There is nowhere for it to go to. Where does it come from? You, you're opening statements this evening. I was talking about... Habits? Yes. Yes. I mean, I saw, I suppose a lot of parallels with that in this situation. I see. But I can't, for the life of me. For the life. I understand in this particular situation why I would agree to, I shouldn't say that, why I would... Co-create. All right, co-create an additional negative situation on top of a negative situation that's already taking place. But why are you defining what has taken place as a negative situation? And why are you defining everything else that occurs from that point forward as additional negativity? If you are functioning within a positive vibration, how can anything that you are associated with in that way and interacting with have anything but a positive reason for its creation? Dingo. That's fine for someone to see on another level. Oh, here we go. That's fine for another level, as if it was not all one level. level. Again, the habit of separation. Oh, yes, I understand it intellectually. But emotionally, I choose to make a difference that there is an intellectual and an emotional and an emotional understanding, and therefore I refuse to blend the two, and therefore I refuse to understand it. What makes you think there is another level? Oh, God. Oh, God. There is only a little one. another level to understand it upon when you create another level to understand it upon. Do not forget. Unconscious knowingness is the same thing as conscious unknowingness, which is saying you consciously choose to not know and relegate it to your unconscious self, which does know. But it is all one thing. It is all one constant. one consciousness. There is no other level. Only the illusion that there is. Now, if you wish to understand, then simply, once again, allow yourself to understand that every. Now, if I were to suggest to you that you would underline the word every, as many times as you could, how many times do you think you would underline it before you would underline it before you would get tired. Until you would understand that I mean every when I say every. How many times could you underline it?

if you wish to understand, then simply, once again, allow yourself to understand that every. Now, if I were to suggest to you that you would underline the word every, as many times as you could, how many times do you think you would underline it before you would underline it before you would get tired. Until you would understand that I mean every when I say every. How many times could you underline it? All right. That many times underline the word every. To understand that when I say every, I mean every situation is fundamentally neutral. until you give it meaning. Positive or negative. No situation has built in meaning. No circumstances. No scenario is inherently negative or positive. It just is. Until you decide to choose how you wish to look at it. Then, looking at it as a positive, at it as a positive idea creates a positive cognition and a positive effect in your reality as you relate and interact with that situation. Choosing to think that it is a negative situation to begin with creates for you more reinforcement of negative experience because then that is all you allow yourself to see in a fundamentally neutral situation is the negative side. Based upon what you've said, I find a grave contradiction. All right. When I first. approached the situation. There wasn't a thought in my mind that the situation was negative. I was not looking at the accident as a negative situation. What has then got to do with now? Again, understand. No matter who you used to be when you first approached it, you obviously, the moment you chose to experience negativity chose to be someone else. To whom it was possible to have a negative experience. What has? Why did you choose to become someone who would only experience the idea in a negative way rather than the continuance of the positive idea? You have two individuals that are experiencing a situation from a positive stance, no matter what it is. And you have another individual or additional individuals enter the same situation. You still have the two that are looking at it positively. The others are not looking at it positively. But that is their reality. It doesn't have to be yours. Why should you be attached, judgmentally, to the way they choose to look at the situation? Why should that change your positive outlook? Well... All right. Let's see if I can answer that. It does not change my positive outlook with regard to the accident itself. Ah, uh, uh, uh. You are making a differentiation. Yes, because there is a differentiation. No, you are making a differentiation. No. There is no differentiation until you make one. If you are completely the idea, this idea, this interaction completely positively, then no matter how many other individuals appear within it that choose to be negative, you will still love them the same.

not change my positive outlook with regard to the accident itself. Ah, uh, uh, uh. You are making a differentiation. Yes, because there is a differentiation. No, you are making a differentiation. No. There is no differentiation until you make one. If you are completely the idea, this idea, this interaction completely positively, then no matter how many other individuals appear within it that choose to be negative, you will still love them the same. You will still feel that they are there for a positive reason. You will not allow yourself to create an effect of negativity in your life with regard to any regard to anything in that situation, anything, because their reality is not yours. Just because they are interacting with you does not mean that for you they are not there for a positive reason. Maybe for them, you are there for a negative reason or a positive reason, or for themselves they are there for a negative reason or a positive reason. But the idea for you, no matter who or what they are there for a negative reason, or a positive reason. are can still be positive. You could, for example, say, well now, here we are interacting in this relationship. We are having a positively good time. Here comes someone to interact with us. They are choosing to be negative. What a wonderful opportunity! For their negativity may allow us to choose, to continue, to prefer our positive reality and let us know though we are just as strong and can be even more strengthened because we have a negative reality to look at and know that we don't prefer it. So that negativity may be exactly what you, my friend, in your state, need to strengthen yourself according to what you believe in so you can stand up for yourself so that you can then truly physically stand up. You follow me? Yes. Yes, I do. Use your imagination and trust. that is all. Thank you very well. Thank you. I have an additional question. All right. It has to do with where emotion comes in with this. Yes. Okay. Because listening to him talk, it sounds like the judgment of negativity came when it didn't feel good. Your emotions are the result of what you already believe to be true. To be true. You follow it. Okay, I was wondering if I had a backward. I was just going to comment on what you were like, you know, this is just my, you know, my, my, perception. Yes, your wonder, go ahead. He was feeling, since he's, you know, vulnerable, how you say that, he's very strong, I guess. how you interpret it. Yes. Vulnerability is infinite strength. Yes. To me, that makes a lot of sense. He feels the negative effect of the parents. And he feels this and he doesn't want to create, for them, a painful experience. But again, understand.

this is just my, you know, my, my, perception. Yes, your wonder, go ahead. He was feeling, since he's, you know, vulnerable, how you say that, he's very strong, I guess. how you interpret it. Yes. Vulnerability is infinite strength. Yes. To me, that makes a lot of sense. He feels the negative effect of the parents. And he feels this and he doesn't want to create, for them, a painful experience. But again, understand. The idea is that if you know you are functioning within your integrity, and you are fulfilling all of your end of the idea in terms of what you feel to be true for you, then the idea of feeling someone else's negativity is creating it for yourself. If you simply recognize they are choosing to be negative, then you can assist them by giving them a positive reflection that will then allow them to see in you a reflected opportunity to also become positive if they decide to. If you know what you are and who you are and find yourself in a situation with other negative individuals in that way around you, then simply recognize that if you know you are functioning within your integrity, then perhaps you are there for the purpose of reflecting some positivity to them. Perhaps they need you more than they are willing to admit. Fashar. I'll find you. I understand that, and that makes a lot of sense to me, and there's also this reality. this reality that we've all been conditioned with to not make waves for other people. All right. Again, we are not saying that you should intentionally force yourself on anyone. That is why we also say that you can recognize that you are having an interaction regardless of whether you are physically in contact with that individual or not. However, if you also understand that in your terms there really is no hard, no harm truly being perpetuated maliciously by you by being physically in contact with that individual, then all of the ideas that are being told to you by these negative individuals, it is their choice to feel that way, and you are not responsible for that. Even not being responsible for that, though, and listening to everything you've said, I know that a negative, and I'm using that way, And I'm using that word again, another negative situation on top of all the other crap that's happened, is being... But whose negative situation? So it's theirs. They are choosing it. What do you have to do with its creation? It is their creation. You are responsible to them to be yourself. You are not responsible for them or their choices. Now you get? A big habit to change. Oh, another habit saying it is a big habit to change. Habit, built upon habit, built upon conditioning, built upon habit, built upon that's the way it always has been, built upon another belief, another scenario, another creation.

do you have to do with its creation? It is their creation. You are responsible to them to be yourself. You are not responsible for them or their choices. Now you get? A big habit to change. Oh, another habit saying it is a big habit to change. Habit, built upon habit, built upon conditioning, built upon habit, built upon that's the way it always has been, built upon another belief, another scenario, another creation. It's third density, for sure. That is no excuse. I'm just telling you where we're coming back. We... I said the civilization... I am laughing with you. At your wonderful joke. At your wonderful joke. Yes, I know. I know. Oh, thank you! You may all take eight short. Short, break. All right, I'll say, sharing! All right, I'll say sharing! Bessar! My friend, you know, we're out by the pool, and we were discussing the difference between emotion and intuition, and we were sharing with each other what our realities were on that. Nice. And I sort of felt for me that my emotion and my intuition were the same thing. And I was wondering if you could sort of comment on that as far as if there is a distinction, There is in a sense of distinction since you have made one in that way. There is a differentiation, but recognize in this sense the idea of intuition is more the idea of knowingness, whereas emotion, energy motion, is one of the three parts of the artificial construct you call your personality that you have created to remind you that you do in fact know what you know. So emotion is more a reflection of intuition, expression, intuition expressed through the personality, although everything is, of course, one and the same thing in different manifestations of itself. But in this way, the differentiation is simply that. Intuition is simply knowing, recognizing or being cognizant of the relationship of you and the thing you are interacting with. Emotion is emotion, energy motion. It is emotion. It is more an activation idea. It is the recognition of the intuition in action in that sense. It is more the idea of giving yourself a barometer by which you can then see or feel within yourself the reflection of your degree of acknowledgement of your knowing yet. You follow it. Yeah. Can you give some sort of assistance? Yes. regarding how to work out, if you are letting your emotions hang you up in situations. Ah, ah, ah, ah, oh, ah. Emotions do not hang you up. Judgments hang you up. Judgments hang you up. There is no such thing as, once again, an intrinsically negative emotion. Judgment creates the polarity. that you experience as a seemingly negative emotion. The emotions themselves do not hang you up. They are simply put, once again, E-motion, energy in motion. For sure? One moment. You follow me. So, yeah, I knew. So in releasing yourself from judgment and judging situations.

do not hang you up. Judgments hang you up. Judgments hang you up. There is no such thing as, once again, an intrinsically negative emotion. Judgment creates the polarity. that you experience as a seemingly negative emotion. The emotions themselves do not hang you up. They are simply put, once again, E-motion, energy in motion. For sure? One moment. You follow me. So, yeah, I knew. So in releasing yourself from judgment and judging situations. Say. If that is such a habit for people to judge things. It is a belief that it is a habit. Okay. Can you give assistance on releasing judgment? There are many ways we have reflected and assisted with this idea. Different individuals will experience different portions of this reflection according to what they feel they need to understand the idea. Now, you can put it on this level, very simple understanding, if you wish. The idea is to recognize what you prefer and what you do not. But what you do not prefer does not have to be invalidated as something less than what you do prefer. You follow it. Therefore, to simply recognize what you prefer and act that way allows you to experience your preference. Judging what you do not prefer creates you to be the vibration of judgment. of judgment, the vibration of what you are judging, you form through your judgment and attachment to what you don't prefer. So, why would you want to judge if the idea is to become something else? Judging is what keeps you focused on what you don't prefer. You follow me? Yes, I do. So why would you want to do that? Don't. Fine. When we look at a situation and we view it as being perfect, and we have this phrase of, oh, that's perfect. Is that a judgment? It is a recognition. The idea is that everything is perfect, everything. The idea that you need to achieve perfection is a judgment. Because you are saying that you are not already everything that you can be. To express the idea you are being at that you are being at that you. are being at that given moment. Are always perfect. Always. You will never achieve perfection. You are perfect now. You are always a perfect manifestation of the idea you are being. If you are being another idea later on, then you are simply being another perfectly manifested different idea. Not a better one, a different one. Perfect on its own terms unto itself. unto itself, just as perfect as any other idea you have ever been or will ever be. But different. Mm-hmm. So perfect is just a word, a label that we put on something for just existing as it is. Yes! Thank you. Full cognition of what something is is the cognition of its perfection. Okay.

being another perfectly manifested different idea. Not a better one, a different one. Perfect on its own terms unto itself. unto itself, just as perfect as any other idea you have ever been or will ever be. But different. Mm-hmm. So perfect is just a word, a label that we put on something for just existing as it is. Yes! Thank you. Full cognition of what something is is the cognition of its perfection. Okay. And we have brought about the distinction the distinction of whether it's perfect and not perfect as being a judgment of being good or bad. Yes. Okay, thank you very much. Fuck you, guys. I was going to ask you, what role does instinct play in emotions? Again, the idea is that many times you may find that when you are functioning upon your instinct with conscious awareness, when you are trusting your instinct, there may be, in your terms, less need to experience the so-called range of emotionality other than simple, unconditional love. Thank you. All emotions are derivations of love. Love is the only emotion there is, really. Everything else is either a judgment of that or some sort of differentiation of that. That would apply to angers and resentment? and resentments? Oh yes, oh yes, oh yes, oh yes. And do remember once again that hate is not the opposite of love. Guilt is. For love is complete worthiness, and guilt is the belief that it is worthlessness. Hate is only the polarity of the idea a polarized expression of love attachment after having passed through the filter of the judgment of guilt. But it is simply another manifestation of attachment. Hate still believes itself to be worthy of something. Guilt doesn't. So everything is, as far as emotions go, a derivation of love. For love is what you are made of. Love is all that is. Thank you. Yes. I'm wondering if you would like to reflect about the archetypal symbol of the crows. In this way, as you may already know, it is an expression to some extent for many individuals in different ways, but generally speaking of curiosity, investigation. Also, to some extent, the idea of alarm. The idea of alarm. idea of the marking out of territory. To some degree, in some cases, some of the polarities also will be the idea, both in a positive and a negative way of unseen actions and subconsciously delivered information. Like a messenger. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Sure. For sure. For example, would you comment on our mythological cyclops? Thank you.

of curiosity, investigation. Also, to some extent, the idea of alarm. The idea of alarm. idea of the marking out of territory. To some degree, in some cases, some of the polarities also will be the idea, both in a positive and a negative way of unseen actions and subconsciously delivered information. Like a messenger. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Sure. For sure. For example, would you comment on our mythological cyclops? Thank you. In this way, to some extent, do recognize that it is partly the idea of what you call the archetypal mythology and partly a physicalized interpretation out of the archetypal energy substream of consciousness of a manifestation of a portion of your own consciousness that represents itself as what you would call second density civilizations of existence, second density worlds, the idea that for you there is no third dimension of sight, no parallax, no reference point. Everything is flatly perceived with one eye. rather than dimensionally perceived with two. So it is a symbolic interpretation of a manifestation of your subconscious archetypal mass conscious energy of the second density ties that you may still have to that level. Is there a connection between that idea and what I have heard referred to as the elves or the elders? To some extent, there is that mixed in with it, yes. As that will have been a bridge, a link, a tunnel, a doorway, from the second to the third density experience. And represent therefore an expansion of consciousness that you call the elders. What geographical area did they exist on? here on this planet. There were some scatterings in this way, not exactly completely one arrival point, so who speak. But in this way, the old connections of what you would call now, though not then, Asia, as it was also connected to the idea of what came to be called Lemuria in your Pacific. To some extent ranging throughout the world. that area. All right? Mm-hmm. Sharing! For sure? Yes! Surrealistic artists had believed that their art should stem from their dreams, basically because they felt that it was their only pure source of imagination. I was just curious as to how you, that coincide with your philosophy and... In a sense, although recognize that your physical reality also stems from your dreams. Simply what they are recognizing is that dream reality, physical reality being one type of dream reality, both are products and extensions of the dimension of imagination, which is what you are, all potential ideas of existence. It is within the idea of existing consciously within your dimension of imagination that you do recognize that all is possible. All is possible. possible. And they are simply recognizing that portion of themselves. From your physical reality, though, does your imagination become subject to outside influences? Is that? There is no outside. Ah.

reality, both are products and extensions of the dimension of imagination, which is what you are, all potential ideas of existence. It is within the idea of existing consciously within your dimension of imagination that you do recognize that all is possible. All is possible. possible. And they are simply recognizing that portion of themselves. From your physical reality, though, does your imagination become subject to outside influences? Is that? There is no outside. Ah. You may imagine there is, but then you have created that with your imagination, and so physical reality is still subject to your imagination. Before me. Yeah. Are you all right? Yeah, I do. The only thing that I'm confused about, I guess, is if it's imagination from you, or strictly from your dream state, which I understand as far of your physical reality. Are you able to more, in your dream state, more fine-tuned to yourself, to yourself without, That is as you believe it to be, and so it is so. But your physical reality is also a part of your dream reality. Your dream reality is also a part of your physical reality. So when you understand that they are one reality and not two realities, then the same ideas will be just as possible in both. Thank you. Thank you. Sure! Mr. Sean? Thanks. I've heard that the Labor Day weekend is going to be a good weekend for viewing you UFOs. Did you know? I did. I see. And I'd like to know... What you call the idea, September. What you call the idea? October. Highly active. Okay. Both months in their entirety then? Generally. Okay. There may be what you call peak points, but fall your instinct. Okay. In terms of where to go, would you suggest that I follow my instinct? Yes, well. For there are many variables now, many variables, and you may find that a recommendation now will not be a recommendation then. Thank you. Thank you. Sure. Ishaar? Yes. Yes. I have noticed that, oh, over the last several years, that over the last several years, that probably 95, 95, 98% of the women I know that have had children have had cisterians. Ah. What is this all about instead of natural childbirth? Why are they being cut open? In this way, in many cases, it is because there is still a belief within your society that natural childbirth is too painful, has to be painful. Thus in this way, for the child, in a sense, it is not. And it is one way to open up the eyes. up the ideas within yourselves about coming to terms with many of the different projections and different types of ways of giving birth in this sense. To allow you to know there is not just one way. And to allow you to know that these children are very multi-dimensional and will enter through unexpected doorways.

way, for the child, in a sense, it is not. And it is one way to open up the eyes. up the ideas within yourselves about coming to terms with many of the different projections and different types of ways of giving birth in this sense. To allow you to know there is not just one way. And to allow you to know that these children are very multi-dimensional and will enter through unexpected doorways. Hence all the testive babies and things that are starting to happen. That too. I heard someone saying something about that the other day and that there is some legal thing that the doctors, for some reason, are afraid of getting sued or something like that. I don't remember all the details, but that was part of the reason for this area. It does not matter what physiological symbol you attach to give yourselves a reason for it. The ideas in this way is simply an exemplification that there are now many doorways to come through. And that many of them are attached to the idea that you have, the beliefs that you have, have that the so-called old ways are still attached to pain. Isn't it easier for the child to be lifted out of the wound rather than to have to go through a group of the canal? That is what you believe, and so it is so, as we are saying. Oh, okay. So it's just a belief, it's not real. Yes. Nothing about the idea of child where it has to be painful. Nothing. Bischar. Yes. What kind of experience? What kind of experience? would a child have being, the process of being born through the integration of using like a water birth with dolphins and stuff. What would your experience be? What would your experience be? What would your experience be? What you might call less forgetting of who they are? I was just going to ask that. So the birthing process, as we know, is a little bit traumatic. In a sense. And we forget things. So you're saying that they would... They would be allowed to transfer from one dimension of experience into another and still take with them a lot of what they are familiar with. They do not have to be purged of their experiences. experiences by pain. And what would the dolphins experience at that time? Oh, joy. Lots of communication? Yes. Do not forget that they are assisting you in that way now. Okay. And, well, this is something that I was thinking about doing. And if I want to... I do... Understand if you simply follow your intuition in this way. That you will create a scenario. You will create a scenario.

be purged of their experiences. experiences by pain. And what would the dolphins experience at that time? Oh, joy. Lots of communication? Yes. Do not forget that they are assisting you in that way now. Okay. And, well, this is something that I was thinking about doing. And if I want to... I do... Understand if you simply follow your intuition in this way. That you will create a scenario. You will create a scenario. atmosphere and you will create a condition that will allow the child along with you to co-create and choose whatever methodology is best for both of you, whether it may be the one you think you are going to do or not. But follow your instincts and you will create an opportunity to create whatever is needed. In other words, there have been individuals who have imagined that they would give birth that way and once again wound up in the idea of what you call cesarean. but simply they did create an atmosphere that allowed there to be the recognition or the cognition of whatever scenario was of best benefit for all concerned. Okay, so what you're saying is, prior to the birth, the child and the mother both agree. Oh yes, always. Well, is there any way I can communicate with my child? with my child before to say that this is what I want and let's work it out. This is what we want. Keep it equal. Now, explore it as one possible method. One possible method. But understand. The child comes from an experience of feeling, not thought. And in this way, what feels correct is what will happen. you follow me. But you can talk with a child. Yes. Do remember that before birth, you are not talking to a child. Thank you. I needed to be reminded of that. Thank you. Masha? Yes! Just as we have agreed upon this physical reality that we all exist. I'm here in these five. Do we also have an agreed-upon reality where we exist when we leave in between lifetimes or what? Yes. What happens? There are many different levels you have co-created within that existence as well, and this is shared by the mass consciousness of many different consciousnesses within the universe. There are many different things that can occur, according once again, to the belief system that you have and to what you need to experience. You can experience everything from having a complete overview and understanding. overview and understanding of all the ideas you have ever been in physical reality and know that you do not need to incarnate ever again and can go on to other levels. You can go from that level all the way to the experience of not even knowing you have yet died. And become what is called in your vernacular a haunting. A hunting.

You can experience everything from having a complete overview and understanding. overview and understanding of all the ideas you have ever been in physical reality and know that you do not need to incarnate ever again and can go on to other levels. You can go from that level all the way to the experience of not even knowing you have yet died. And become what is called in your vernacular a haunting. A hunting. The idea of what you call spirits or hauntings are simply individuals who have transcended to the non-physical realm but don't. realm but don't know it because of their belief system. It does not allow them to have the recognition that they have in fact died because they did not know what to expect. Don't they find it frustrating trying to communicate with us? Sometimes. That sometimes is what can clue them in if they are open enough to listen. But the original idea of what you call your so-called was for the purpose of functioning as a spirit psychologist to let them know they had died, they were fine, they could go on. They are not originally for the purpose of badishing evil spirits. Are you suicides to some degree also in that realm? Yes. For in this way, what you call conscious suicide is to a point. The only method open to a point method open to you to negate the contract you originally made it. But in this way, do understand that once you usually arrive back at the point where you originally made the contract, you reestablish that contract once again. And many times experience similar circumstances in the next life so that you will allow yourself to explore the original idea of knowing you create your own reality and taking responsibility for them. for that in that next life that you perhaps refuse to explore in the previous one language who took your own life. Do recognize, therefore, that there is a difference between the idea of the consciously recognized suicide and what you would term regular death because every death is in fact suicide. Since you do create your own reality. But consciously recognized suicide is usually the lack of willingness to take responsibility for what you have created for yourself to experience. yourself to experience. Your lack of willingness to believe that you are in control of it. So the majority of the idea of what you call conscious suicides usually are reborn almost immediately. Oh, yeah. Bishar? Bichard. What is? One moment, one moment. Yes. I remember a comment that Seth made about suicides. He said if that happens, you are required to live out that particular time span that you had originally that you had originally set for yourself. Oh, in a sense. But do recognize that what Seth has also referred to is the understanding that time spans differ when you are non-physical and when you are physical.

yeah. Bishar? Bichard. What is? One moment, one moment. Yes. I remember a comment that Seth made about suicides. He said if that happens, you are required to live out that particular time span that you had originally that you had originally set for yourself. Oh, in a sense. But do recognize that what Seth has also referred to is the understanding that time spans differ when you are non-physical and when you are physical. Now, to the physical being still alive, the time span may seem to be long for how long the ghost hangs around. But to the ghost, it doesn't necessarily have to feel like that same amount of time. Thank you. Yes. On the suicide subject, what about people who don't want to be on life support systems and would rather die more critically ill? In this way, again, that may be different. For it may be an opportunity to be of service to allow individuals to recognize the degree of self-empowerment that individuals have and to explore the idea that there is a point at which you are, in fact, then interfering with someone else's choice of reality. So the idea may be able to be able to be. So the idea may be able to be able to be. maybe in your terms a fine line, but a line there is. I see. And back to, this also relates, again, back to what you had started with in habits. If somebody has a habit that eventually takes their life, is that, is that okay with the higher self? It will depend, once again, upon many of the reasons for such an event and the degree of conscious awareness of what is going on. Because there are operations. opportunities for the higher.