Part 1
Okay, so I have another question about parallel realities. Yes, sir. I ask this question knowing I'm not in physical reality. I'm creating physical reality. Yes. Obviously there are established patterns in the collective agreement. Yes. For convenience sake. For convenience sake. And I've heard you discuss this, but I'd like some clarification. Yes. I get the idea of changing one's character within the framework of the existing stage By being a new character on that stage. Yes. However, what I still need clarification on is shifting of realities to where the stage itself becomes something other than it currently is. Well, in a sense, that is actually what you're doing by shifting character. Because you cannot really actually have the same character on the same stage. When you shift character, you actually have shifted stages. Everything shifts. That's why we see. say any change is a total change, not just a partial one. You can look at it and experience it as if it's a partial one, as if you're a different character but still on the same stage, or you can recognize that what's actually happening is that as you create yourself to be a new character, you must have by definition also created a new stage. So it depends on how you choose to define it. Okay. That's why we often use the analogy of the blue cube. Have you heard this analogy before? No. The idea to illustrate the point is that if you imagine a blue cube, it has six blue sides, yes? Yes. Now imagine one of the sides changes to red, just one. Yes. Now you can say, well, it's the same cube, but now it has five blue sides and one red one, so there's only been a small change, or you can recognize, that a cube with five blue sides and one red one is actually a completely different cube than a six-sided blue cube. And by looking at it as a completely new cube, you will understand that one has nothing to do with the other. That everything has changed. And what affects the cube with the five blue sides and one red one is completely different than what affects the cube with six blue sides. I follow that. So. I've seen your graph. on parallel realities, where it has the various streams, if you will. Yes. That's simply a very crude analogy. Understood. Understood. When I talk about alteration of the stage, think of something, for example, that's far removed from this stage. Far different. Not far removed. Far different. Far different. Yes. Forgive my language. This is all right. Again, we simply wish to clarify some so that we can truly understand when we are on the same page as you humans say. Far different. Yes.
Part 2
if you will. Yes. That's simply a very crude analogy. Understood. Understood. When I talk about alteration of the stage, think of something, for example, that's far removed from this stage. Far different. Not far removed. Far different. Far different. Yes. Forgive my language. This is all right. Again, we simply wish to clarify some so that we can truly understand when we are on the same page as you humans say. Far different. Yes. So one, where you do have a unicorn running outside this castle, you know, the land looks like San Gia, that to me seems so different than the stage right now that even though one can become that which might exist in the stage right now, that even though one can become that which might exist in the stage. that stage. Yes. I don't see the stage unfolding with it, even with your... Most likely because it isn't necessary. Many of the things that you are describing as representative of the differences between one parallel reality and another may in fact not actually be necessary to accomplish what you need to do. Sometimes it is simply a human assumption that the stage has to look very different in order for certain things to happen or for certain things to be represented. That's not always the case. The idea of the quote unquote, typically staged version of your reality is actually far more flexible and far more capable of holding more results than you may think, without the need to alter the look of the stage as abruptly as you may assume it needs to look in order for certain other things to happen. Now, I'm not saying those things are impossible, not by any stretch. But it is simply often a human assumption that things must look very different in order for very different things to happen. But you must understand that your stage is actually quite flexible and is capable of holding a number of plays and a number of outcomes beyond what you may think, without necessarily having to change the props so drastically. Okay. Nature is first and foremost efficient. It will make use of what it has first before it needs to go on to anything else that isn't immediately available. So if you are capable within your reality of accomplishing certain effects, using the props that are already at hand, then there is no need for another one to be created, and your higher mind will counterman the creation of that extra prop. Because again, it will seek to go the path of least resistance and be the most efficient. Makes sense? It makes complete sense. All right. Thank you. Thank you. You could, however, if you wish, glue a horn on a horse to approximate the idea if the symbol has meaning and will help you. I will avoid that. All right. Thank you.