Relationships (Part 1 of 4)

Oh, right, I'll say, how are you all, this evening of your time as you create us. We will begin this interaction this evening of your time with a little bit more illumination of an idea you have shared with us from time to time. Questions that you have asked concerning the fundamental existence of all that is, these ideas to some degree we have shared from time to time with you regarding what you normally consider to be the questions you ask when you are exploring the portions of your consciousness that create in you the need to ask, well, why does this all exist in the first place? Now, recognize many of you have translated some of these ideas into the notion, well, what is my purpose, what is the purpose of the existence of all that is and so forth, and we have discussed with you. times that the idea first and foremost of purpose is something that is created within existence. Existence is not subject to purpose. Purpose is subject to existence. Therefore, that which has existed before the idea of purpose was created does not necessarily need a purpose to continue to exist. However, an even more, quote-unquote, fundamental question, as we have just said in this way, many times is simply that you find yourself from time where I'm asking, well, why does it exist at all? In this way, recognize we can share with you the idea as, for our understanding, but also recognize this. It is not that in the discussion and sharing of this idea with you that we mean in any way, shape, and form, to be mysterious in that way, to be mystical. No. But the idea, the question in that form is dealing with, primary fundamentals. And when you find yourself dealing more and more with primary fundamentals, you will find that the answers are more and more simplified. Now, the idea as to why many of you have thought that there is no answer to that question is simply because it is, in a sense, so simple you have not recognized it. But the idea in many ways of your society has created a type of structure that will not allow answers of a certain degree of simplicity below your complexity threshold to be acceptable or to be valid in this way. Now, therefore, again, this idea may, as we present it, seem, to your habitual way of thinking, perhaps to be an oversimplification, but this is the way that it will translate into your language. There is nothing we can do about that. Therefore, the idea of thinking, perhaps to be an oversimplification. idea, as you have asked it, well, why does existence exist in the first place, can simply be viewed from this point of view. First of all, you are asking that question based upon a preconceived assumption as if there was a choice.

an oversimplification, but this is the way that it will translate into your language. There is nothing we can do about that. Therefore, the idea of thinking, perhaps to be an oversimplification. idea, as you have asked it, well, why does existence exist in the first place, can simply be viewed from this point of view. First of all, you are asking that question based upon a preconceived assumption as if there was a choice. You are creating the idea that it could have been that existence existed or it could have been that it didn't. But recognize, you are assuming that only one idea, only one side, is real, existence itself. Non-existence is just as real. But recognize this. It is that you are dealing now with primary fundamentals, and when you deal with primary fundamentals, the basic foundational ideas of creation, then those, those are dealing now with primary fundamentals, and when you deal with primary fundamentals, the basic, the basic, the basic, Those ideas are in and of themselves their own definitions. That is how they are experienced as their own definitions. What this simply means is that it is not that existence is real and non-existence is not. It is simply that they both are real. But by definition, existence is the only thing you can experience. Non-existence because of what it is by definition doesn't exist in any way that you can have an experience of recognizing its reality. Thus, the idea is that what you are experiencing is simply that portion of creation that brings with it the definition that you can experience it. It is not that it could have been non-existent, for non-existence is, is right now real. But by definition, it doesn't experientially exist to you. Thus, both realities are there, are present. But only one carries with it the ability to even create a cognition of it. That is why it only seems that one side is all there is. But it is a primary fundamental polarity. Simply that on that level, its own definition, is the reality you do or do not experience. You all follow along. Yes. Yes. Sherry? Bouchard. There was a very strange, I had a very strange experience last week. Strange? Yes, very strange. An individual misplaced his keys. Missplaced. Right, and I was aware of it, but I didn't think anything of it. and the following morning as I was emptying my purse, I found a strange set of keys in the inside pocket of my purse. Or strangely. And I immediately assumed there were his, but my first reaction was total surprise. My second reaction was embarrassment. And my third reaction was that I knew exact, I knew I had not taken those keys. that there was no reason for me to put the strange keys in my purse and that they had probably gotten there on their own, so to speak. Because I know that this can happen.

my purse. Or strangely. And I immediately assumed there were his, but my first reaction was total surprise. My second reaction was embarrassment. And my third reaction was that I knew exact, I knew I had not taken those keys. that there was no reason for me to put the strange keys in my purse and that they had probably gotten there on their own, so to speak. Because I know that this can happen. It's happened to me that I misplaced things and suddenly they were there when they weren't there before. And so I thought... Then they are not misplaced. Okay, no, but I didn't perceive them at one point. We understand. Okay. And so I thought, well, this... I mean, I was a villainy. but I knew that I had nothing to do with it consciously. And then I said, well, that's very interesting. You know, we've been talking about synchronicity. There must be a good reason for it. Can be. What do you think? Well, I never did find out because... You never did find out? What the reason was. No, I really... See, I would like to know from you if you can perceive whether in fact they were physically put in my purse by somebody or whether they just... just materialized in there. Because the person who misplaced his keys didn't believe me. He thought I had taken them, which doesn't make sense. And it doesn't make sense that anybody else would have picked up strange keys and put them in a strange purse. Then in this way, what does that allow? You and your friend to find out about each other. Well, I didn't find out. I didn't find out anything except that he thought I took them. Which tells you what? Well, I wasn't upset that he was angry, but I thought, well, you know, that's his perception. If I had been in issues, I might have gotten angry too. Maybe. And I thought... What are you unlocking for each other in that way? Really, for me, it just never got resolved. I just never got resolved in terms of this particular synchronicity, which I at first thought... You may simply be attempting to make it more complex than it needs to me. Yeah, I'm sure. Do you feel, or have you felt, that you can be a reflection in certain ways for this friend of yours? I thought so, but I did not sense that he was willing to discuss it with me. What does that have to do? do with the fact that you may still be willing to be a reflection. Oh, nothing, nothing. I really would like to know if those keys got there on their own. Or if somebody... See, he was sitting behind me. But my...

a reflection in certain ways for this friend of yours? I thought so, but I did not sense that he was willing to discuss it with me. What does that have to do? do with the fact that you may still be willing to be a reflection. Oh, nothing, nothing. I really would like to know if those keys got there on their own. Or if somebody... See, he was sitting behind me. But my... Our perception in this way is that there was, in your terms, what you call, an assumption made on someone's part when the keys were found and deposited where they thought they belonged. But in this way, simply recognize that no matter what the agent of the transference is, it is still single. and it is still magical. Okay. You follow me. Yes. It still serves the purpose to allow the recognition of the interaction that is going on between you and your friend to come about. But there wasn't much of an interaction. There wasn't. No. You said that your friend, in your terms, accused you of taking the key. Well, he didn't accuse me, accuse me. He said, well... He said... Did you say your friend? He created the idea of anger. That's my perception when he called me on the phone. All right. Then you have created your own perception of your friend's anger. Whether the friend had anger or not, your creation of it, the involvement is an interaction. Right. But I don't know where it got us or what I got out of it. Why don't you ask your imagination? I did. And... What did you get? Not very much. The idea that you got not very much is a judgment. Again, you may be assuming that it is more complex than it has to be. What did you get? Well, actually, for myself, I really felt that those keys got there on their own, and I thought it was exciting. That's what I thought. Very good. Very good. And I thought it was... a shame that... Oshame? Well, okay, that's a judgment. I thought he would perceive his being exciting too, but of course I'm not the one that was put out by... So what does that tell you? Well, he wasn't. What else does it tell you? What does it tell you about you? No. About me? About me? Well, oh, then I had expectations. All right. What else? But I didn't let it bother me for very long. All right, very good. And that you can recognize that your creation of a situation and someone else's creation of a situation and a third explanation of a situation are all their own complete realities. They're all different from each point of view, what you say. Yes, and all equally real for what it does for you in terms of allowing you to create. of allowing you to create yourself in the image you imagine yourself to be.

good. And that you can recognize that your creation of a situation and someone else's creation of a situation and a third explanation of a situation are all their own complete realities. They're all different from each point of view, what you say. Yes, and all equally real for what it does for you in terms of allowing you to create. of allowing you to create yourself in the image you imagine yourself to be. So in this way, you see that the idea of this key can unlock many locks simultaneously, allowing you to experience your portion of the idea and someone else to experience theirs, even though they may be very different. All the tools that you have in your society, can all be viewed as keys. They fit every lock, one key. Changes and transforms to fit every lock that there is. So you use the key in your way. They use the key in their way. And in a sense, though it is transformed, it is all the same one key, basically. Thank you very much. No, thank you. The sharp. You! Last week, you were talking about different chakras of the Earth. Can you tell me what significant as Big Mountain has? Big Mountain? Yeah. Which? It's in Arizona on the Four Corners Reservation. In this way, it will be once again more what is in our terminology a free zone, rather than what you would recognize as one of the major chakras. But in this way, all the chakra points and energy forces upon your planet are beginning to blend. So every free zone energy vortices will carry within it the idea of energy from all the vortices. In this way, that particular energy is not dissimilar to the idea of the energy vortices in what you call Sedona. And it will be one that will carry within it many different reflections so that when you place yourself in that energy, what is paramount within you that you wish to face, will be brought to the surface. It is by the idea you have described it and by the location it appears in your idea of geography, indicative of the idea of the crossroads of sorts where all these ideas come together so that you can know that you are in that energy vortex, an integration of all the directions of energy that you are. You follow me. It will also be one of the balancing points. for what you call American Indian culture in this way, one of the doorways of extra-dimensionality through which many of their consciousnesses have communicated to many other levels of consciousness. Right now there's a public law which says, which is trying to relocate the Indians there on that land and take over that land to dig out the minerals and oil and coal there. Can you say something about that? What do you wish to do about that? What do you wish to do about that?

of the doorways of extra-dimensionality through which many of their consciousnesses have communicated to many other levels of consciousness. Right now there's a public law which says, which is trying to relocate the Indians there on that land and take over that land to dig out the minerals and oil and coal there. Can you say something about that? What do you wish to do about that? What do you wish to do about that? Well, I wish to stop the process. Then, in your terms, go in love and life without accusations and educate individuals and give them an opportunity to recognize the idea of what the energy can be used for, and how there is in your terms far more energy naturally in the area than anything they could extract from the land. You follow me? Yes. It is up to you. It is your planet. You decide. How the ballot. go. If the federal government isn't stopped and they do... You are the government. When you equalize yourself and open up equal communication with that portion of yourselves, then it will not be something outside of you that has control over you. It is not that it will become stoppable, it simply will never start. When you equalize the idea and do not accuse, do not judge, but give that portion of yourself an opportunity to recognize that you are the government and that you all together will decide, but it will take action on your part. The willingness to show that you have the conviction that this is what you prefer and not something else. I just went there on a delegation from Santa Barbara. Oh, right. Did you have a good time? Yes. Oh, right. They're preparing for their sun dance ritual right now. Yes. And I met a seven-year-old boy who had gone. His name is Joshua. I was wondering if you could tell me anything about him. Has been, in your terms, American Indian, many times. has been shaman many times, is connected to the idea of what may be loosely term symbolically rainbow consciousness or fan consciousness, fan. has been, and still to some degree, is within the dream state, what is termed Heokka, Thunderdreamer, will and can be focus of much energy in a very gem-like way, it is a very crystalline individual. Herefore, it is a very crystalline individual. Herefore, its own specific purposes. I say it's because it is a blended individual rather than he or she. That is what we can perceive at this time. Thank you. Mr. Mishar. Yes. Hello to you and all of that is signing. And to you. I miss chatting with you the last few weeks. You have not been chatting? Well, I have. All right, then. You were specifics? Only sporadically. Yes. On a few occasions, I imagine myself to exist on your planet in physical form in the way that you described a virtual personality.

is what we can perceive at this time. Thank you. Mr. Mishar. Yes. Hello to you and all of that is signing. And to you. I miss chatting with you the last few weeks. You have not been chatting? Well, I have. All right, then. You were specifics? Only sporadically. Yes. On a few occasions, I imagine myself to exist on your planet in physical form in the way that you described a virtual personality. And in that imagination, I imagined basically saying greetings to you and on a few occasions. Our perception is that you also were. also worked with the crystal sheets. Wow. I will, uh, I'll take your word for it on that. You will have to. I like to. I like to. I like it. All right. This is up, too. Yeah. That is simply our perception of the energy. Sounds good to me. I enjoy that. It seems that on the second occasion that you took the group up to your space, your spacecraft, I chose not. I chose not to participate by not being here. And I'm becoming convinced that I am creating a reason for that. Oh. I'm also creating puzzle money as to what that reason is. Do you have any more to share with me about that? Now, in the sense, as you have said, you have been creating it yourself. You are recognizing that you are as unlimited as you wish to be. And the idea of any particular time has nothing to do with the timing in that way. You are quite capable of recreating the experience any time. Uh-huh. In this way, it may simply be an indication and a reflection for you that you are not necessarily bound by any particular schedule. That is very true. It's particularly reflected in my life. Nice. So that's true. That's terrific. Alright. I had a really... I had a really... Really neat experience. Oh, do share. Oh, it was about a week ago. And as I was coming over the hill from Kathy's house to my own domicile, I spotted in the valley a tremendous amount of, like, haze or smog. I thought to myself, she wouldn't it be neat to move this out of there, clear up the day. So I contacted the mass consciousness of the area in my imagination. I just said, hey guys, you want to bring up some wind and move this stuff out of here? It's kind of chorus of voices going, hey, yeah, that sounds neat. So by the end of the day, the wind had come up and cleared out the smog. It was really terrific. Thank you, Switcher. My pleasure. Do you understand the term? No, I don't. Valve, gate. Oh, okay. Link. Connection point. Terminal. For communication or for air flow? Same thing. Oh, that's neat. Activator. Catalyst. Ah, now it's hitting home. Plenty cute. Yes, thank you. True. Mishar. Hushar. Hi, Bashar. I'm here. Hi.

sounds neat. So by the end of the day, the wind had come up and cleared out the smog. It was really terrific. Thank you, Switcher. My pleasure. Do you understand the term? No, I don't. Valve, gate. Oh, okay. Link. Connection point. Terminal. For communication or for air flow? Same thing. Oh, that's neat. Activator. Catalyst. Ah, now it's hitting home. Plenty cute. Yes, thank you. True. Mishar. Hushar. Hi, Bashar. I'm here. Hi. Do you mean, on Earth? I don't know yet. I don't know yet. I'm going through a lot of emotional. pain right now, I'm sure. Emotional pain, which means judgments of yourself. Yeah, I guess so. All pain is the result of judgment. There is no need for pain, and it does not occur until you judge portions of yourself and separate them from the rest of all that you are. Now, why in this way would you be judging yourself at this time? Well, I'm very much in love with you. someone right now. Okay? I've taken a choice to... May I ask you a question? Yes. What does, in your definition, the term, in love me? I don't know. I see. May I ask you another question? Sure. Oh, thank you very much. Do you love yourself? I'm trying. Trying? Then you are doing trying. Yeah. Now. Do you wish to love yourself? Yes. Are you sure? Yes. Unconditionally? I do not hear anything. You cut me up before I can't say it. Cut you up. Loving myself unconditional. Do you think you can love others unconditionally? Anyone at all? It's a struggle. Why? What do you think it entails? That makes it a struggle for you, to love someone unconditionally. Because I have so many expectations. Ah. In other words, you are not trusting that the situation as it occurs is the way it needs to. You're right. You may also be. under the assumption that you need a relationship in order to allow yourself to be recognized by you as complete. You're right. And in this way, recognize that if that is your belief about yourself, since belief creates reality, you can only attract someone into a relationship that will only reflect your sense of incompleteness about yourself. Follow me. It is very simple. The idea of your so-called soulmates can appear in your lives when you know you are already complete and are operating on a... vibrational level that attracts someone of equal vibration to reflect to you that you know you are complete, and thus that is the relationship you thought. But the idea is not, if only my soulmate was here, I'd be happy, but since I am happy, I allow the idea of someone to be in my life to reflect that happiness to me. So I can reflect their happiness to them.

and are operating on a... vibrational level that attracts someone of equal vibration to reflect to you that you know you are complete, and thus that is the relationship you thought. But the idea is not, if only my soulmate was here, I'd be happy, but since I am happy, I allow the idea of someone to be in my life to reflect that happiness to me. So I can reflect their happiness to them. If you believe you are incomplete in that way, in that sense, then you will usually attract someone who reflect that incompleteness to you, and in that way it will usually be someone who will also derive benefit from having you reflect incompleteness to them. For sure, I have another question for you. Did that assist you? Definitely. All right. What connection do I have with this individual? What have I had a past life experience with this individual? His name is Edison. More than one. Has it been based on dependency? Um. Once. Little girl and father. Disappointed. Disappointment. What is the, what is the, I mean you say past life, but what is it in this life? What is it in this life right now? This is the transformational life upon your planet. All that you have ever been, all that you have ever experienced with anyone in your terms is now blending into one understanding the idea that you are as powerful as you need to be as an individual to create anything in your reality you desire without having to hurt anyone else to get it or rely on anyone else to have it. Therefore, there may be still some remnants of the idea of dependency in that way, but you are being given an opportunity to shake that off, to be complete. So that you can interact completely and not interdependently. I want to be with an individual. How can I make that happen? You want to be with an individual that represents the vibration you desire to have. have in your life. Now, maybe that can be with the individual you recognize, and maybe it won't. But the idea is that even if it is with the so-called individual you recognize, when you change the vibration you are, if they decide to, let us say, stick around, they will need to change the vibration to match you. If they change their vibration, then they are not the same individual anyway. literally. Therefore, the idea is not so much that it has to be any specific individual, but that the idea of the vibration you are is matched. If your vibration is matched in perfect harmony by someone else, then all of your needs, so to speak, are filled, and you don't care who it is. Now, it may be that you are recognizing that that particular individual may be able to share that idea with you.

Therefore, the idea is not so much that it has to be any specific individual, but that the idea of the vibration you are is matched. If your vibration is matched in perfect harmony by someone else, then all of your needs, so to speak, are filled, and you don't care who it is. Now, it may be that you are recognizing that that particular individual may be able to share that idea with you. But if so, they will still change into another individual in order to do it. When you change, you follow me. Oh, definitely. And when you change, whatever individual needs to be there to match your vibration will be there. Whether it is the same individual or not will not matter to you because it will feel right. You follow me. Many times an individual, depending upon the timing of what they are learning, may interact with you simply to get you to a certain point, but it may be that the timing is not that they will continue to interact with you, as it may be that they need to interact with someone else to get them to a certain point. Then whoever needs to be interacting with you from that point forward will automatically be there. You follow me. It can be the same individual, but it does not have to be. And you will not care because it will feel right. One more question. All right. Why are newborn babies so powerful? Because they have not forgotten so much yet. You follow me. Oh, definitely. Oh, thank you. Yes! Yes! On your planet, you have, presumably two people get together, you said you have sex and procreation, sort of like we have. Ice. But how structured is that relationship if children only, children get reoriented and are on their own by the time that their bodies are three? In this way, as we have said, relationships will transform into whatever the purpose is that is being served. While everyone will still always recognize the idea of the biological child, child and the biological parent, everyone in our civilization is married to everyone else. Every child is everyone's child. Every adult is every child's parent. Thus, in your terms, it is not very structured at all. In other words, two people, you, were you ever married? I am married to my entire civilization. If you mean, do I have physiological offspring? No. Okay. However, I have had relationships in that way. Right. But let's suppose someone on your planet has a physical relationship and there is offspring. Yes. But there is no cultural pressure, or I don't know what that word is, for the two of you to remain together. Correct. So that the relationship may evolve and you'll now, next week or next year, be with someone else.

you mean, do I have physiological offspring? No. Okay. However, I have had relationships in that way. Right. But let's suppose someone on your planet has a physical relationship and there is offspring. Yes. But there is no cultural pressure, or I don't know what that word is, for the two of you to remain together. Correct. So that the relationship may evolve and you'll now, next week or next year, be with someone else. Perhaps, but do not forget that we never lose track of any relationship that is once formed, is altogether highly likely that the individuals you have had relationships with will remain in your life, more or less, in some way, shape or form. But not necessarily, as we would say, the primary relationship. Perhaps in your terms, as we understand it, correct? Not necessarily. Although, once again, we do understand what you mean, but we do not necessarily look at a relationship as more primary than some other relationship, or equal. Yes. It is simply a different definition, but that does not make it, in a sense, more primary just because you are assuming that, quote-unquote, more physiological time may be spent with one individual than another. But that doesn't make that relationship more primary... Not really. It simply makes it the relationship that it is. Which changes nothing about what all the other relationships are. Right, except that there's, in the physical universe, there's a limit that you have days, just like we do. do? To some degree, yes. I mean, it gets light and it gets dark. Yes. And so there's a limit, if you will, to the amount of time any one day if you're spending... In that sense, we understand what you mean. We simply mean that it is not primary in terms of energy. Okay. Another thought I've had in exploring this for myself about sort of answering the question you asked the young lady, what does it mean to be in love? It seems to me that the sensation, that most... People say they're in love. Yes. What they are meaning is that they are experiencing a particular physiological sensation. It's in some part of their being. And the part will differ if you do a survey of individuals, which is itself interesting. But it just struck me today that the basis of that physiological sensation is separation. That on this planet, when someone says that they're in love, they're experiencing separation from that individual rather than than integration. Pulse. Well, I'm also now, I'm not denying the possibility that some people experience a oneness and call that love. I'm not denying that. I'm merely, in my experience, I'm trying to describe something which I have observed and experienced that I think more often than not, the average person... Are you saying that the idea of quote-unquote being in love is that when you are not physically together, you miss it? Is that what you are saying?

also now, I'm not denying the possibility that some people experience a oneness and call that love. I'm not denying that. I'm merely, in my experience, I'm trying to describe something which I have observed and experienced that I think more often than not, the average person... Are you saying that the idea of quote-unquote being in love is that when you are not physically together, you miss it? Is that what you are saying? No, that's not what I'm saying. There's a quality of intoxication that occurs. Ecstasy? Well, no, because I think that it's nearly identical to the excitation that occurs when you take drugs, when one on this planet takes drugs. And I have perceived a distinct similarity approaching identity between the experience of taking a drug. What you mean is multiple orientation. No, I don't understand that. Multiple orientation. Disorientation. The idea that when you are, quote-unquote, in law, quote in love, that you are blending, that you are integrating and opening up more of yourself, connecting into more levels, so that there is multiple orientation, which many times can be like disorientation to you. Let me come out this another way. Perhaps what you are referring to as giddiness or intoxication. Well, let me... Maybe I can come out this another way. All right. I have observed within myself, day, that my relationship ships that I've had are formed on the basis of different parts of my physiological being, if you will. In other words, I would say there are some people I have loved with my head, and I sense kind of a source point of the intoxication with my head, whereas with other... We understand. The idea to our perception is simply that when you have that kind of differentiation, that kind of separation, yes. It is not that you have not created the relationship out of an overall, conditional love, but what you are recognizing perhaps is the specific vibration representative of the specific purpose that you are with that specific person. Yes, but I, okay, I know this, I do follow you. I've noticed for myself a distinct, a dramatic, of light years apart, difference between the quality of the relationship and the particle of excitation, if, as I would describe it to myself, it's a relationship that the connection is with my head, or the connection is with my heart. Yay. In this way, you may understand that the idea of being connected in a total way will be more representative of what you say to be feeling, and thus it may be that simply the relationship you are having allows you to connect with more of yourself than other relationships. So all we are saying is that when you find that the quality is more differentiated, it may simply be that that that particular relationship is for a more highly specified reason, okay?

idea of being connected in a total way will be more representative of what you say to be feeling, and thus it may be that simply the relationship you are having allows you to connect with more of yourself than other relationships. So all we are saying is that when you find that the quality is more differentiated, it may simply be that that that particular relationship is for a more highly specified reason, okay? But it's in my experience, and of course, I don't, I want to find, it's not a judgment, but it's an observation that it would seem to me in retrospect that all of the relationships I've had that were connections of the head were interesting, they served purposes, et cetera, et cetera, but in all of them, I was having a relationship, the other person at the other end was less capable of of achieving and understanding the kinds of ideas we're sharing here of a unity among all people. In other words, it was a person who existed more in separation, whereas the relationships I've had with my heart are with people who are capable of experiencing a greater unity among people. Well, again, that is only in your terms logical, because in this way, when you attract an individual for a specific type of interaction that is limited in that. that way, then that is the level on which they are going to relate to you and you to them. You are simply attracting what defines the vibration you are at any given moment for the purpose of co-creating that relationship. Therefore, when you create a relationship with more of yourself, obviously you will attract an individual that will also be able to share with more of themselves. I got it. Thank you. I'd just like to tie in, though, what I said about drugs. We live in a society which this particular civilization here in the United States, which places a tremendous emphasis on things of the head, analytical reasoning. Right. Analytical, by definition, is a taking apart into its pieces, which is obviously part of separation. Right. So whether it's true of other people or not, the thought occurred to me that because of that cultural environment and a great attachment to form, perhaps the majority of many people, Many people, who knows the majority, many people are led to focus attention on having relationships of the head, if you will, which seem to me to be almost by definition divisive. We understand. In other words, it can be the result of the idea of the habit of the way you have created yourself to do things. Yes. And it is the connection of the head rather than the heart that struck me as having a distinct near-identity to a drug experience. Thank you. that drugs are a dividing. When you take drugs, you are individuated, I think, from the mass consciousness because it's a shutdown.

We understand. In other words, it can be the result of the idea of the habit of the way you have created yourself to do things. Yes. And it is the connection of the head rather than the heart that struck me as having a distinct near-identity to a drug experience. Thank you. that drugs are a dividing. When you take drugs, you are individuated, I think, from the mass consciousness because it's a shutdown. Although there are portions of the idea you are sharing within the mass consciousness to have the experience anyway. But do recognize in this way that the primary portion that you are sharing with the math consciousness is that it is the drug that is creating the experience when in fact it is you that is creating the experience. Okay, one last thing. So I could, perhaps a direction I should consider evolving in... It's up to you. No, I understand. It's up to me, but would be, I mean, it sort of fascinates me that there are these different parts of my physiological... That is why you are here exploring this. But there'd be a possibility of somehow integrating all of those so that my experience would be having a relationship that encompasses all of me rather than just focusing on one part or... All you need to do is be that kind of being and act like it, and that is what you will attract. Thank you. Thank you. Bishar? You! Thank you, Bishar. I've just returned from three weeks in Sedona, where I had communication with the Space Brothers. Oh! And I would like to know... I found myself looking at land, buying at land up there with an individual called Michael. I would like to know. of my work in the future involves this proposition. You mean you don't know? No, I don't. You don't? No. Why not? Doesn't it excite you, attract you? I found myself sitting in the real estate office, having the deja vu feeling that I had created this on the inner plane. But in that way, does not that allow you to recognize your own signposts where you have laid them? I felt it was true, but then I had a channeling up there which said, no, this individual is not to be in your life in the future. But in this way, recognize once again that every individual is never the same individual in the next second. All predictions are readings of the energy that exists at the time the prediction is made. There is no such thing as a prediction of the future. Is this individual of the earth plane I get to feeling that he is one of the same brother? Everyone, in a sense, is. I know, but there is a feeling about him. that he's not like other people. Who is? Take back your power and be who you are.

are readings of the energy that exists at the time the prediction is made. There is no such thing as a prediction of the future. Is this individual of the earth plane I get to feeling that he is one of the same brother? Everyone, in a sense, is. I know, but there is a feeling about him. that he's not like other people. Who is? Take back your power and be who you are. It may be that if this individual, quote unquote, is not physiologically in your life, it is to grant you the opportunity to recognize that you are complete as well. I feel that now. All right, then do what excites you. So is this a good idea to buy land and Sedona? Good, bad. Is it what you want to do? Yes, no, maybe. Maybe. All right. Then as long as you are, maybe, you will wonder. When you know whether it is something you prefer, something that excites you, then you will have your answer. It is as simple as that trusting that what excites you the most is the representational idea that is is the path you chose to be. That's what excitement is. The vibration of the path you chose to be. That is why you can always trust that if you follow your excitement, you will always be automatically supported because you are being the path you chose to be. Excitement is your barometer. You follow me. Yes, sir. Can you comment on the future of the context that I'm having with the space budget? Only that, like everything else, it will accelerate in perfect timing. There may be, as we read the energy now, more individuals coming into your surroundings, and that there is a large energy gate, so to speak, for your entire civilization, which you may be able to take advantage of in the area you call Sedona, since you will be in an energy vortex. During what you call the energy. spring of 1,987 of your counting. Salt is up to you. Thank you. The Sharps. I have 15 questions. I'll just ask a couple of them. All right. I'm just keeping everybody on the tip. A couple friends of mine were sharing a terrific that we all of a sudden realized that we had the same one, and what that dream was, was we would be out in a field somewhere, and we would play this game of seeing how high we could jump, and then the next thing, like, you know, up toward the telephone pole, and we sort of kept at about that level, and then the game was to see how long we could stay up there. And then we just started floating around, and I remember actually telling people, you know how easy this is? It's great. And it was a very, very exhilarating, wonderful feeling. And it was all this, we just simultaneously realized that we had had this same dream.

know, up toward the telephone pole, and we sort of kept at about that level, and then the game was to see how long we could stay up there. And then we just started floating around, and I remember actually telling people, you know how easy this is? It's great. And it was a very, very exhilarating, wonderful feeling. And it was all this, we just simultaneously realized that we had had this same dream. And that you were the same dream. That's right. Well, I mean, it's not really a big significant thing, but I don't know, there is something there. I don't know. It's very light, and I don't mean to make a big deal out of it. It's so lovely. Oh, we understand. If you can make a big deal out, I mean, if you can do that. It is not. at all uncommon to be communicating with many of your friends in your astral state. Oh, it's lovely. And the interesting thing was that I did not even recall, it wasn't like I woke up and said, well, you had a great dream last night. It was something that I actually did not even think of. And the reason, until a woman mentioned it, or something triggered at night. Yes. And the reason for that, that's very wonderful to me. is that this week I have had people tell me things like, one guy actually walked up to me, and he was a person who tended to really take himself very seriously and, you know, revere things and all that, and it was very sweet. But he sat there and told me that I need tools and all that intensity and energy, well, you should really channel that. And I was thinking, I don't actually think it isn't, you know. I mean, this guy is maybe he's coming up and telling me all these things and what I need and oh, I need tools and I need this. And I was getting a little angry for a second until I realized I don't need any of it. And he was there to tell me that. Ah! So you allowed the idea of your anger to be natural, so it simply aligned you with the belief that you knew yourself to be. That is what anger is for. And I actually told him how I felt in a very nice way. I mean, he was almost confused. Ah. Good. It was good. On fusion, cofusion. Yeah, it was terrific because he couldn't understand how much I could express my liking for him while at the same time not taking him seriously. People guessing. No. Thank you for being such a loving mirror. Oh, it's my pleasure. Yes. May I ask one more thing? You do not have to ask if you can ask. All right. That's right. This is a fun thing. I had a realization that I was actually my father. That's right. Absolutely my father.

understand how much I could express my liking for him while at the same time not taking him seriously. People guessing. No. Thank you for being such a loving mirror. Oh, it's my pleasure. Yes. May I ask one more thing? You do not have to ask if you can ask. All right. That's right. This is a fun thing. I had a realization that I was actually my father. That's right. Absolutely my father. Nice. You are. I mean physically. Here's what happened. And I don't know if this is true. I don't even know if I care if it's true. True. But if you can tell me... True. It's relative. Yeah, I know. But let's just have some fun. Oh, what? In World War II, see, I feel like I know him really, really well. He has the same sense of humor, same handwriting. same handwriting. He's one of those charming Irish guys. And anyway, he was killed in the invasion of Normandy on the beach by a landmine. And then a week later, I was born.