Synchronicity (Part 2 of 4)

quote unquote more of your being than simply mental activation done. In other words, once again, it is not so much the idea, although this is what occurred as well that to know someone is to love them, but to love them is to know them. That is telepathy. Currently much of our scientific community will not accept or acknowledge telepathy or imagination is real. That is because it is still to them an analytical process. Okay, how would you suggest that we go about making these approaches more acceptable to scientific community? It is, in your terms, becoming acceptable to many individuals, and in this way, again, I'd only suggestions to simply act like it and afford them an opportunity to see it in action. For what they are doing now is trying to learn to look at it, is trying to learn about a process by stopping it and not doing it. How will they be able to perceive that the action is correct? They're using very rigid... I don't! When enough individuals act that way, they will get the picture. They will feel it also. Yes, of course. They will see it all around them and finally say, well, what's it all about? Okay. Again, understand that the idea of consciousness Consciousness originate, so to speak, to use that term, outside a time track. Everything that can be analyzed can only originate inside a time track. Therefore, once they include consciousness into their equations, they will get the picture. And it will instantaneously begin to activate the series of events that will reinforce itself. into their reality. Synchronicity. Understand many of your so-called scientists have utilized synchronicity to, quote-unquote, achieve the understandings of physics that they have. They just don't know it. Some of them do. Currently recently, the ones I was speaking of were the ones that were conscious of or the ones that were conscious of it. Currently, I have some friends that are conducting. friends that are conducting some experiments with dolphins. What they're doing is they are playing together a sort of a computer keyboard and if the dolphins can punch in various actions that result in a change in their environment, which is water temperature, heat, food being presented, this sort of thing. Is there a method by which they can accelerate the learning? the learning process. Only by doing what occurs to them. Mm-hmm. Again, the idea is that we already are aware that there are individuals in your society that have taken some of these steps. If you wish to join them, then take the same steps in your own way. So it's a boldest what's trouble. And a doing. In other words, you can perceive and interact with dolphin consciousness from where you are sitting if you are so inclined to do it that way.

them. Mm-hmm. Again, the idea is that we already are aware that there are individuals in your society that have taken some of these steps. If you wish to join them, then take the same steps in your own way. So it's a boldest what's trouble. And a doing. In other words, you can perceive and interact with dolphin consciousness from where you are sitting if you are so inclined to do it that way. But from what we are receiving you are describing, it is unlikely that one of them is going to come swimming by in your living room. Therefore, go to a place where you can interact together or create such a place. Well, that's what this is the place I'm speaking of, where some friends are doing. Then go and relate, as you will. And simply understand that it is not so much that you are teaching them, but that you are teaching them, each other. For there are going to be many things that are going to occur between you where you might think they are just being stubborn and what they are trying to do is get you to learn something in return something in return. So do not be, how shall I put it, humanistically chauvinistic. You follow me. Yeah, very much so. In fact, certain of this line of this line of research was stopped, prevented because of considerations that it would not be acceptable for the public. For instance, what I'm speaking about is occurring in Epcot, which is an experimental prototype community of tomorrow in Disney World, we have seized pavilion. And the idea that the public would not, quote-unquote, accept telepathy or experiments in telepathy between dolphins prevented this type of Exhibit, demonstration. Are the dolphins going to be there? Yes, they are there. Then telepathy will occur, regardless of what the expectation is in that way. But how could we overcome the reluctance to present to the public disas effect, you know, as a possibility? Why don't we, it would be nice to put up an exhibit saying, please feel free to telepathically communicate with these dolphins. It is possible, you know. But there is a restriction. We will let you figure out how to come to terms with all the individuals with whom you are interacting. I already have been trying the screen. Because one of the ways in which these interactions is going to occur is by sending them this particular tape, we've already established an interchange in doing it. Let me put it this way, if you will, perhaps this may or may not, does not have to make a difference. From our point of view, in looking at your planet, if we were to, let us say, scan your world in search of what you would recognize as alien-thinking species we would find two on your planet, the humans and the dolphin whales.

particular tape, we've already established an interchange in doing it. Let me put it this way, if you will, perhaps this may or may not, does not have to make a difference. From our point of view, in looking at your planet, if we were to, let us say, scan your world in search of what you would recognize as alien-thinking species we would find two on your planet, the humans and the dolphin whales. Therefore, recognize that what you are doing is forming a communication link with an alien species on your very own world. Thus recognize that your world in many ways is unique and unique in one more way in that the majority, the majority of what you would call alien races on other planets bear a closer resemblance in third density reality to a humanoid life form. You are more. You are more unique in having one right in your own backyard that is not as close to humanoid as many alien races you will encounter beyond your world. Therefore, it is a rich opportunity for exchange of true difference between different alien environments. I'm feeling a little bit like a ping-pong ball lately. All right. That can be an enjoyable game. Even for the balls. Even for the ball. I'm wondering if you could help me kind of level it out to the point of being a little more comfortable. I will help you when you understand you don't need help. I felt that way for a couple of weeks. Then the youth. you were then is not the you you are now, so do not say you felt that way. Right. Someone else did. Why are you choosing to feel the way you feel? Well, that's part of the question, because I feel a definite duality. All right. What is wrong with that? Um. Does that not give you a unique point of view about yourself? Can you not learn from it? Can you not enjoy it? Can you not integrate and absorb what you are learning from? or what you are learning from this dual perception of yourself in a positive way? Can you not assume that every situation is fundamentally neutral and choose to go at it with a positive attitude so it will have a positive effect instead of a negative attitude so it will create a negative effect? Yes. Am I being of hell? Yes. Well. Yes, I can do that. All right. Do you? think that that will assist you? Yes. Why do you think so? Because of... Always. Because it implies. Because it implies because it implies that Thank you for pointing out the media. Thank you for pointing out the media. for boldness. Thank you. Yeah. Wow. That's okay. It's synchronous. Project. It implies that I forgot what's implied. Good. Welcome to the moment. All right. Okay. Let me ask you a specific thing, then, which it implies that I don't have to worry about anything.

you think so? Because of... Always. Because it implies. Because it implies because it implies that Thank you for pointing out the media. Thank you for pointing out the media. for boldness. Thank you. Yeah. Wow. That's okay. It's synchronous. Project. It implies that I forgot what's implied. Good. Welcome to the moment. All right. Okay. Let me ask you a specific thing, then, which it implies that I don't have to worry about anything. All right. And one of the things that is happening that is still a little bit worrying, is that I seem to have a drained sleep thing happening where I am falling asleep driving on the freeway. Yes. And I've got everything. Oh, oh, oh. Oh, let's reinforce that one. Let's reinforce the negativity. All right. Oh, yes. Oh, we all know that's negative. Oh, yes, you are doing a negative thing. Oh, yes, you are doing a negative thing. I had myself completely covered with white light, so I was not afraid on that level, but what I'm wondering is... Completely covered with white light, all right. I covered myself in white light. Yes. To protect myself because I was sleeping on the ceiling. Oh, to protect yourself, which implies that you believe you need protection, which implies that you believe you can be harmed. can be harmed. By large trucks when I was leaving. It freaked out my mother. All right. Well done. You have to be more impressed by that. All right. Shine it off, it's okay. May I ask you a question. Are you fighting your own instinctive natural schedule? Well, I thought about that, and I remembered what you said about 2 to 4 o'clock being sleepy time or being our low energy points. In general. In general. And I was not able to pinpoint these series of suddenly becoming sleeping in terms of that general cycle. So what? Are you going to take us literally or are you going to follow your own instincts? Oh, it's not between 2 and 4 p.m. So, even though I am sleepy, I will wait until 2.4 p.m. because Bashar said I can only be sleeping between 2 and 4 p.m. So I will not stop and take a nap. Is that what you are saying? Are you giving me that much of your powers? No. Well, all right then. What are you doing about your own instinctive schedule? Well, I guess in my instinctive schedule is that I should fall asleep at 55 miles an hour in my car. Are you missing the point? Why? Why? in your estimation, were you falling asleep while you were moving? Well, that's what I don't know, because this has never happened before. I'm not the kind of person that falls asleep on the freeway in broad daylight. When you fell asleep, you obviously were the kind of person. You are not contradict yourself.

is that I should fall asleep at 55 miles an hour in my car. Are you missing the point? Why? Why? in your estimation, were you falling asleep while you were moving? Well, that's what I don't know, because this has never happened before. I'm not the kind of person that falls asleep on the freeway in broad daylight. When you fell asleep, you obviously were the kind of person. You are not contradict yourself. Perhaps you are not that kind of person now because, A, you are not on the freeway. At least I will assume we are not. Now, the person you were then is not the person you are now. What you are being shown is this entire idea of disassociation. Now, recognize that you are quite all right. You did not get killed by a truck. You follow me. Therefore, our first suggestion is to stop playing what if. And let's talk what is. All right. Now, as you, the you were then was driving along the freeway and falling asleep, what were your feelings. What were your thoughts not connected to the idea of what would happen if you fell asleep? Just your general thoughts, your general feelings about yourself at that time. Well, it was very strange because it was almost like I was... It was strange because it was almost like I was almost like I was going into a deep meditation. to a deep meditation. All right. Very good. Very good. Very good. Now, what does meditation mean to you? It means... It means... ...connecting with another... Definitely. All right. Very good. Very good. Thank you. Now may I ask you a question? Yes. Does it mean disconnecting from this one? this one? Is that what you have always thought meditating to me? Sometimes yes and sometimes no. Like most of the time I am semi-meditated. All right. And it's cool. You know, I can do both. Cool. All right. I can be turning forth at the same time. All right. I can be by dentism. All right. Now, let me ask you this. Let me ask you this. Okay. With regard to the synchronicity of having your mother presence. Oh. What does it represent to you now? Oh, my goodness. Do share, do share. And speak up. You do not want them to fall asleep. Okay. Yes. Oh. goodness I didn't make that connection. Yes, my mother always falls asleep. In fact, my mother was asleep. In fact, my mother falls asleep maddeningly. I feel that she's... I mean, um... Yay. I feel that she's sleeping her life away. I see. And so you falling asleep at the wheel, did you say, freaked her out or woke her up? She was asleep during the old thing. Yes. Until I told her, I mentioned to her casually. week. Yes. After we arrived, then I had started to fall asleep. Yes. And her reaction? She freaked out. So you mean she woke up?

she's... I mean, um... Yay. I feel that she's sleeping her life away. I see. And so you falling asleep at the wheel, did you say, freaked her out or woke her up? She was asleep during the old thing. Yes. Until I told her, I mentioned to her casually. week. Yes. After we arrived, then I had started to fall asleep. Yes. And her reaction? She freaked out. So you mean she woke up? She woke up. And then the next time we drove, she made sure that she stayed awake and kept talking to me. Now do you get the picture? Do you see the reflection that you were being of service to? I was being of service to her. service to her? Oh, come, come, come. And in this way also yourself in the idea of your relationship to her, and what you think of her, and what you think of what she does, and what she thinks of what you do, and this and that, and showing her reflections of herself that are encapsulated within your feelings of her and vice versa. Were you not acting out a scenario about her that bothered you and allowing her to see how it affects you? Yes. All right, then. Let it do. be obvious. Now, therefore, simply recognized, again, there is no what if this is not the beginning of some dis-ease, or I'm going to follow with me to the wheel now all the time. Now that you are in touch with the reasons, or at least some of them, for why you enacted that scenario as a reflection to her, you recognize the purpose that was served and recognized it can be served in other ways rather than in ways that are unconscious. You follow me? And therefore, in ways that are not, quote, unquote, detrimental to your physical health. Sometimes you will find that you will share exciting incidents, co-incidence with someone else so that you both will wake up to what is the happening between you. So you will shake yourselves, give yourself some excitement in the relationships. Park enough of it. Yes. Therefore, thank you for your sharing. Thank you. Thank you. Guys. The first thing I want to share is that I truly do trust you, I'm realizing that. I truly do trust you. I'm realizing that. I trust you too. Thank you. all of you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The next... Now they're going, what did he mean by that? I fully trust you to be who you are. Exactly. You cannot be who you are. Exactly. You cannot be anything else. And it also means infinite possibilities. Thank you. Right. Whatever you do, it's all right. Because you're as infinite creator as I am. We also trust the synchronicity of the interaction that we are together. Marvelous. That is what we trust. Wonderful. Thank you. Thank you. Would you share a title for last week?

fully trust you to be who you are. Exactly. You cannot be who you are. Exactly. You cannot be anything else. And it also means infinite possibilities. Thank you. Right. Whatever you do, it's all right. Because you're as infinite creator as I am. We also trust the synchronicity of the interaction that we are together. Marvelous. That is what we trust. Wonderful. Thank you. Thank you. Would you share a title for last week? How about last week? That's a good one. How about... Ancient dreams? ancient dreams. Thank you. Which is something that exists in musical arrangement in your society. Georgia telling. And in this way, you will find that some of the vibrations within that will also bring out some of the ideas you wish to explore. All right. Thank you. And I have some questions. You know, I will assume, what tonight's title is. tonight's title is. Thank you. Thank you. We already have one. Synchronicity two. Okay. Okay. I have some questions for John Sigawit, who's from Dallas, Texas. And I'd like to ask these for his, for him and his wife. He said, several years. He said several years ago in a spontaneous out-of-the-body journey to our planet, the Sun One, was greeted, I was greeted by an elder who addressed me by the name Arnault. You, um, may, could you offer any insights? Is this, excuse me, is this the name whose vibratory frequency represents my soul self, whatever? In a sense, for now, yes, it will do. There are also some other connections that we perceive, but it will do as. but it will do as a reflection to relate to from the point of view you are now as a physical being. It will assist in the blending of the vibration of your higher self with the physical being that you are. Thank you. Second question. He wants to know if he will be channeling Arnos soon. Soon is a relative term. Okay. All right, third question. Do not mean to be mysterious, but that is the answer. Right. Thank you. And the third one is that you mentioned about seven and a half cycles. And he, in the projects that he's involved in, he wanted to know if you had, he's got three listed here, 7.524, 7.538, or 7.646 cycles per seven. cycles per second. What about it? He wants to know if one of those is more accurate than seven. Not more accurate. They are all variations of the same thing with relationship to the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field. There is also a 7.86, and there are some other ones. In this way, simply recognize that the individual's own experimentation will allow there to be the arrival at an appropriate frequency frequency and that frequency will fluctuate to some degree anyway. It is not that it maintains an exact periodicity. Fluctuation. Good. The last question is that you mentioned, he said that you had mentioned before.

relationship to the fluctuations in the electromagnetic field. There is also a 7.86, and there are some other ones. In this way, simply recognize that the individual's own experimentation will allow there to be the arrival at an appropriate frequency frequency and that frequency will fluctuate to some degree anyway. It is not that it maintains an exact periodicity. Fluctuation. Good. The last question is that you mentioned, he said that you had mentioned before. He wanted to know how long you would might predict that the length, excuse me, how long will it be before organized religion as we know will change. Our perception is that definitely within the next 30 of your years. Within that, all is malleable. It can happen sooner. It's up to you. Thank you. That's all. Richard. How do you know you have described this interaction as occurring, not you are here in your imagination creating this interaction, not as we say, astral projection or whatever that is. So how do you know what's going on on Earth? Again, in this way, there are many different ideas and interactions and type of interactions that we partake of, but do not forget that astral projection, in a sense, is also within the dimension of imagination. Okay, then that raises another question that I thought of when Steve asked the question from the guy in Dallas, he said he was out-of-body experience. Okay. Is that Is there any such thing as, quote, out of body travel? Is it only imagination? In your terms, because you have created a type of universe that has the different levels in it, yes, it is real. There is such a thing as out of body. Yes. What we are saying is that the entire idea of all of the levels in the universe is within the dimension of imagination. It is a creation. Can you help me and perhaps other people here get a better grasp on how it is because I think when you use the word imagination and related to this interaction occurring in your imagination, you use the word differently than we use here on this planet. Could you help bridge the gap between the It is simply, as we have said, that what occurs within our imagination is real. The idea is more akin to the idea of becoming, quote unquote, lost in a daydream. that seems to be so very real while it is going on. Then when your focus changes back to the reality you are experiencing before the daydream, only you think that you have come back to the real reality and we're only imagining. To us, the daydream is just as real. I experience our interaction together as a very intense daydream, more perhaps, more perhaps what you might refer to as hallucinations. But I know it's real. But it's your imagination which you are creating. It is yours too. Again, it is a co-creation. It is synchronicity.

are experiencing before the daydream, only you think that you have come back to the real reality and we're only imagining. To us, the daydream is just as real. I experience our interaction together as a very intense daydream, more perhaps, more perhaps what you might refer to as hallucinations. But I know it's real. But it's your imagination which you are creating. It is yours too. Again, it is a co-creation. It is synchronicity. It is the interaction itself that create you and me. Can I ask a question a different way? Did you hear what I said? Yes. What did I just say? You said that it's a Coke that It is the co-creation. It is the interaction itself that create you and me. Yes, I understand that. But my attention is on the fact that there is, if you will, a collective daydream going on of all the beings on Earth. Yes. Without for sure, as Asi, there's a collective daydream going on. Yes, of course. Okay. How do you know the content of that collective daydream? We do not know all portions of that. We do not know all portions. But you know some portions, for example. We know the portions that have to do with the synchronicity of our interaction with you and only those portions. So it's not possible for you to simply observe or is without interacting with this on these Monday, Tuesday, or... But do not forget an observation is an interaction and is actually subjective. Okay, well... I think we may not be taught. may not be talking about it, but it is still an interaction. Well, how did you know about Cernoble, for example, or the challenger disaster? In this way, the idea is that, once again, what you call the physical channel is a part of your daydream. And since we are connected, then anything the physical channel knows, we know. Because again, by synchronicity, what the physical channel knows, we are supposed to know. So we can use it in that way. Okay. Independently of this process called channeling, do you, engage in other data collection activities relative to time. From time for time, yes. And that is one of the reasons why sometimes we can, quote, unquote, come through with information in conceptual form that the channel is not aware of, even though the terminology may not be according to what you use upon your planet. For in this way, we can have our observations about the ideas that we sense are going on in the portion of the data. we share with you whether the physical channel is aware of it or not. Okay. Here's this corollary question. You told us that you physically appeared to the Orion entity, consciousness, in his reality, which is 175,000 years ago. Right. Not a thought projection, but you physically appeared. Both. Both, but... Yes. What you would call a physical appearance.

observations about the ideas that we sense are going on in the portion of the data. we share with you whether the physical channel is aware of it or not. Okay. Here's this corollary question. You told us that you physically appeared to the Orion entity, consciousness, in his reality, which is 175,000 years ago. Right. Not a thought projection, but you physically appeared. Both. Both, but... Yes. What you would call a physical appearance. Which means that you travel, what we would say, travel through, I'm doing that now to talk to you. But it's different because why have you chosen to channel rather than appearing to us physically? I have explained that before. Well, it has to do with we would think you were a God and we couldn't delay. It has more to do with the idea of our energy being so different. It would force an acceleration of your energy and forcing to look at portions of yourself you are not ready to look at. Ah, okay. Alright. Now the idea of our ability to appear to the so-called Orion in this way is simply because their society, even in the state, even in the state that it was in that sense, in what we turn to be negativity, still had within their society already the recognition that they could travel from planet to planet and interact with other races. That was not a shock. One last question. Imagine being in the rafters of the building. You know what rafters are? Okay. And looking down in many different rooms. So you can look and see that there are lots of different rooms. And each of the rooms is a point. in what we would call time. They're all simultaneous. And let's suppose that we're looking at the house that represents Earth. Yes. You're up in the rafters. You can see the past and the future for many possible, many potential pasts and many potential future of Earth. And so you must be able to see some potential futures which you and your civilization, collective you, would prefer that we don't choose. In a sense, therefore simply recognize that it is our perception that because we are interacting with you, it is representative of the type of future you have already chosen. Okay. But only it's like you. You are the ones that make the selection. It is up to everyone. It is your individual choice. Recognize again that the individuals who have not chosen that vibration, are not interacting with us. That's true. They're not here. How is it possible to... They certainly do not have to interact with us. They can interact with many different aspects of themselves to, quote-unquote, arrive at the same conclusion. An individual can be living in a fourth density state without ever having heard the term fourth density, metaphysics, or any of the other ideas that we are discussing.

who have not chosen that vibration, are not interacting with us. That's true. They're not here. How is it possible to... They certainly do not have to interact with us. They can interact with many different aspects of themselves to, quote-unquote, arrive at the same conclusion. An individual can be living in a fourth density state without ever having heard the term fourth density, metaphysics, or any of the other ideas that we are discussing. They can still live that way and have chosen and have chosen the idea of living in that reality when it occurs, totally unconsciously. So your presence here is not merely an origination on your part, but the very fact that you chose to come, we had something to do. Is that what you say? As I have always said, you allow us to interact with you by choosing to interact with us in equal migrations. That is the only one. That is the only way. only way we can interact with you. And because of your willingness to recognize that you can now interact with us. But if you're sitting in the rampant of being able to see a period of time on earth when, let's propose, no person on earth, you can perceive a... One moment! Everything and every aspect that you are present to relate to have to do with you if you are willing to look at it that way. Integrate everything you are hearing from anyone else. Turn the question and the answers and the statements around for you and understand how you relate to it. If you find in this way that you have already related to it on your own terms, then simply recognize that if the idea is still something you are perceiving, then there may be other ways in which you can learn from it. Continue. Okay. Sitting up in the rafters, up in the rafters, you can observe one of the rooms, let's suppose there is a room, a point in time, as we would call it, in which there was nobody on earth that was prompted to interact with you. All right? And then in another room... We can observe that probability. Yes. And then we can also look down and see the room which we experience as the now in which we're interacting with you. Okay. Oh, I answered my own question. I answered my own question. They're going on simultaneously. Yes! There was never a point in time when you decided to interact. You're interacting here, but you're not interacting there. Correct. We are simply with you the definition of the interaction. Thank you. Thank you. Michelle. The point came up in a previous question about the dual nature of personality. If I have two sides to my personality, one of them I like and one of my don't like. One is positive. One is positive. is negative.

never a point in time when you decided to interact. You're interacting here, but you're not interacting there. Correct. We are simply with you the definition of the interaction. Thank you. Thank you. Michelle. The point came up in a previous question about the dual nature of personality. If I have two sides to my personality, one of them I like and one of my don't like. One is positive. One is positive. is negative. Okay, but let's say the negative side wants to eat too many twinkies and this has all kinds of urges. All right. If I don't satisfy those urges, I feel discomfort. All right. If however I do satisfy those urges, I feel remorse. How do you resolve the pure nature of human personality? By simply recognizing first and foremost that all polarity exists as one thing outside of the physical reality in your whole nature. And that you do not have to continue to see yourself as a person. to see yourself as a dichotomy. You do not have to continue to see yourself as a struggle against or between this and that. But simply recognize that you have at any given moment free will a preference. If you recognize that the idea of the ingestion of those substances does not vibrate with the being that you would prefer to be, then if you act like that being, you will find you do not have the urge. Because you are not of the vibration that would contain the idea. have the urge to eat this. Define yourself. Is that? Could that be called willpower or what? Not willpower. Recognition. Ceasing of judgment of yourself. Ceasing of the belief. The changing of the belief that changing is difficult. The changing of the belief that having the concept of what you would prefer to be is not. not the same thing as being it when it is. The changing of the belief that having the concept still implies you have to do something to become the concept you have imagined when imagining it is becoming the concept. Believing that is what will make the change. So what is my so-called bad side jointment? That you have the opportunity to prefer something else. And to recognize that as soon as you conceive of what that something else is, you're it. you're it. So the concept I have of my so-called good side, which I prefer to be, is not really what I want to be, otherwise I would be it. You are simply assuming that the concept itself, when you have it, is not being it, but it is. You are assuming that the concept of the good side to have the concept is not being it. But having the concept is being at the vibratory level of that good side. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to conceive of it. Again, you have to be attuned to the program to hear it coming through the radio.

are simply assuming that the concept itself, when you have it, is not being it, but it is. You are assuming that the concept of the good side to have the concept is not being it. But having the concept is being at the vibratory level of that good side. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to conceive of it. Again, you have to be attuned to the program to hear it coming through the radio. So if you find that you have the ability to even conceive of what the so-called good side or positive side is all about, you are at that moment tuned to that frequency or that notion could never have occurred to you. you. But why does this tremendous interference keep coming in? Because you assume that when you conceive of it, it is not real. You assume that you have to do something special in order to make it real. To stay on the station you need? Yes. You are the one that is flipping the dial. When you have flipped the dial to the point where you can perceive what this so-called positive side is like, leave the dial then. There. What a time? This man suddenly a Twinkie switch. No, no. You are missing the point. The station that you will be tuned to does not advertise Twinkies. No. So it will never occur to you. The urge won't be there. Understand you are contradicting yourself. You are thinking that one being contains both of these urges. No. When you are the vibration, are the vibration of the positive side, you only contain what is relevant to that you. If you are finding yourself experiencing the urges of the Twinkie, you are no longer the other you. You are the you that can experience the urge of the Twinkie. Yeah, but how do you hold that? I find it difficult to hold it. That is your belief. To say, this is the concept itself. Understand this. Your statement. I find it difficult to hold back is a belief. So it is its own reality. So that is what you get. A reality in which you are a being that finds it difficult to hold a concept. So you merely assume that you point totally. Yes. Act like it. Assume that if you can conceive of it at the moment of conception, that is how you are born. You give birth. give birth to that being. And that is the only being that exists. Now, understand, you may use the idea again that we have shared with some of you, the library analogies.

being that finds it difficult to hold a concept. So you merely assume that you point totally. Yes. Act like it. Assume that if you can conceive of it at the moment of conception, that is how you are born. You give birth. give birth to that being. And that is the only being that exists. Now, understand, you may use the idea again that we have shared with some of you, the library analogies. As an integrated being, you have the ability to be cognizantly aware of while still being the concept that you are of all the other probable realities that exist you can have, definition, my reality is what I am and it contains the ability to be what I know myself to be while at the same time being aware of all of the other probable realities. I know I am not. You follow me. Therefore, the idea and the analogy is as if you are a library. You go into the library. You can read every book on the shelf. The one about Twinkies, the one positive, the one negative. Only the one you make the conscious choice to check out of the library. out of the library becomes your reality. Otherwise, it is not a matter of having to fight against the urge. You simply have the type of reality that says you can think about the idea that such a probable reality exists, but that's not the idea you are. You know the library is there, but you didn't check out that book. So the fixity of the human condition, as I see that most people are... What you consider to be the fixedness, is something that you believe to be real. That is the only reason you experience the human condition has fixed because of the definition that it is. Evolving. But what is the, at what point do you go off the rail? Never, never, never, never. Never. You are never off your path because you are never on a path. A path is what you are on a path. A path is what you are on. You are. You can't be off yourself. You are not on a path. A path is what you are. You can't be off yourself. Everything you do, everything, everything, everything is an opportunity to decide what you prefer. Everything. You can learn from everything. Every situation is fundamentally neutral. Your attitude towards the neutral situation will determine the effect that you create in your life. The idea that you can have an urge to eat a Twinkie is a neutral situation. It does not come with any power other than what you put into it. It is simply a string of words if you wish to look at it. if you wish to look at it that way. You empower it. You power it up. Oh yes, the concept of that, that concept, Twinkie, that creates urges that I cannot fight.

idea that you can have an urge to eat a Twinkie is a neutral situation. It does not come with any power other than what you put into it. It is simply a string of words if you wish to look at it. if you wish to look at it that way. You empower it. You power it up. Oh yes, the concept of that, that concept, Twinkie, that creates urges that I cannot fight. You have just written the script and decided to act it out. By imposing definitions into a fundamentally neutral series of props. What is the cloud of birth and depth into this concept of let's say my next door neighbor doesn't have this urge. Yes. And he never has the urge, but I do have the urge. Knowing that your next door neighbor never has the urge is an indication for you of a reality that you can also choose for yourself. That may be why that neighbor is there reflecting that reality to you. Perhaps you are reflecting the same thing back, that he can choose to have an urge if he wants to. I guess my question really is, is it anything to do with a particular lifetime? Only in the most general of senses. Certainly not with a degree of specificity of whether you eat a twink or not. No, but I'm not a ridiculous example, but I just... It's not a ridiculous example. But in this way, simply the overall idea of any predestination is only expressed in physical life in the most general terms. In other words, let us say, The idea of what you are discussing falls under the general category that you are predestined to explore of self-empowerment and the creation of what you prefer. So you are using Twinkies as your...