The Wizards Hat (Part 4 of 4)

Yes. And the energy wasn't within. And what it could do now. And that's still viable then. Yes. Although, again, it doesn't necessarily have to be done that way. As we say, you can utilize this device in any way should perform your imagination direct to you. But you can do it that way if you're living. In a sense, it is like reclaiming the magic within you. within you. If you wish to do it that way and play with it that way, that's all right and it will work. All right. And we're just talking about the holistic beings. Yes. And which type of games could you expect to interact with? You expect over time to interact with the idea of hybrids. You can expect over time to interact with the idea of Pleadians, of serious energy, and a variety of other members of the association that we will not necessarily go into at this time. We're talking about any physical. What we perceive is physical. Yes, eventually, yes. Because I understand we all are interacting with the, in our dream. Yes. We understood that you meant the idea of physical, and that is what we are answering to. Yes. All right, and how about to get tenets? You may find that you will deal with them tangentially because they represent a tenement. represent a tangential connection to the grays which are evolving into another form altogether. So the idea of relations with what you call the reptilians will be handled very differently. Okay, and it will happen on a physical level. It is not that it will not eventually happen that day, but there will be many other things that have to be put in place before such a relationship can occur, because it is not necessarily that such a relationship is directly a part of the kinds of relationships you will feel. relationships you will form with regard to your connection to the association, for they are not directly a part of it in that way. And the following moves, how would we tell if we're interacting with a poor name? Oh, believe me, you will know. You will find yourself filled with a great overwhelming sense of love, compassion, and at the same time, extreme sensuality and earthiness, so to speak. But balanced. Yes. All right, and you know, I'm talking about holistic beings and hogging and the whole point of birth and you take all these different aspects. Yes. All right. Just like an individual being, you take a lot of different aspects. Yes. What's involved in your personality makeup? Yes. Okay. And when you're abducted, you're being in these beings. Yes. in the world of real lifetimes, okay? Yes. Yes. Okay. And that state, that extreme state of fear, freaking out, you know. We understand the contract. All right. Yes. Can you tell me the consideration that aspect, that personality aspect? Of course, always.

right. Just like an individual being, you take a lot of different aspects. Yes. What's involved in your personality makeup? Yes. Okay. And when you're abducted, you're being in these beings. Yes. in the world of real lifetimes, okay? Yes. Yes. Okay. And that state, that extreme state of fear, freaking out, you know. We understand the contract. All right. Yes. Can you tell me the consideration that aspect, that personality aspect? Of course, always. We can leave nothing out because acceleration can only be the product of the acceptance and integration of all aspects, not the, in a sense, in a sense, exclusion of anything. Yeah, what I'm saying is this. Just how we're clear on this. Oh, all right. All right. Because you have said that the grays look at it like, if they could interact, all right, then they have the right to interact. Remember, of course, that we are talking about different factions and levels of grays when you say that. And there are different agendas for each level to certain degrees. But you are, in that sense, referring to the level that recognizes the agenda, for a particular reason? Well, I'm not saying for a particular reason, I'm talking about in general. Because when these... But in general, with which group? With which faction? With the grays. But the grays cover a wide spectrum of factions and groups with different agendas. Yes, I understand that. What I'm saying is this. Yes. What the factions is that the abductions occur. Okay? And if that... more than one faction that that occurs. That's what I'm saying. Now, if it's not one, they all look at it like, because we can interact in this manner in an induction manner, or, you know, detainment manner, we can talk about now, but we have the right to do it because they have, you know, they have, let's say, on that individual, that you know, the majority of them recognize it. as a form of agreement, some of them will, in a sense, impose their own agenda and color the idea of that agreement in a way that you might find a little bit more abrupt or inconsiderate. Others will come from a level of understanding of recognizing the agreement that has been made that in your perspective would be, shall we say, more beneficial or more loving. However, there are some that do not recognize the agreement per se at all, but simply feel they have it feel they have a need and in that sense are right because they have a need, and it has nothing at all to do with the recognition of any agreement that you may have made with them on a sole level.

that in your perspective would be, shall we say, more beneficial or more loving. However, there are some that do not recognize the agreement per se at all, but simply feel they have it feel they have a need and in that sense are right because they have a need, and it has nothing at all to do with the recognition of any agreement that you may have made with them on a sole level. Well, well, in essence, that's what I'm talking about, is that when you're interacting in this manner, you know, like, you know, like, you know, matter, but rather and in the other is too in the sense that, you know, because it's still an upsetting experience for the individual. Yes. Okay. All right. interactions, all of those, where they are, you know, they expand between the different groups of grays. Yes. All right, and the grays feel, you know, they're agreeing on the soul level. And we're just talking about holism. Yes. How about the personality level, the conscious or war personality level, that says, ah, what's going on here, you know? Are you talking about that moment? I'm talking about the graves. Why don't they take that into consideration? The reaction of the human. That's right. the idea is, again, multi-fold. Some simply feel that they should disregard it because it is not as important as the agenda. Others recognize it, perhaps, from the idea of the soul level, in the same way that your soul. Not that it ignores you, not that it doesn't take it into consideration, but simply recognizes it is not as important that your physical persona may, in your terms, freak out, for a moment because the soul may recognize that there is a greater lesson, a greater experience being had that is worth the momentary trouble. In the same way that you may fear a certain job is worth doing, even though it may contain a little bit of pain, struggle from time to time, or you may hurt yourself a little bit or strain yourself a little bit, that doesn't always necessarily come into play with the idea of your overall, quote unquote, goal in the reason for doing what you're doing. From the soul's point of view, what may I understand, and this is not a diminishment of the experience, what may to the physical persona seem overwhelmingly terrifying, from the older soul's point of view, may be nothing more inconvenient than a hang nail, temporarily. And that's another level upon which it sometimes is looked by some of the more advanced grays. In other words, they understand that the physical reality does by definition contain the potential to have pain in the situation for a variety of reasons, more often than not, from the suppressed fear idea that exists within humanity.

overwhelmingly terrifying, from the older soul's point of view, may be nothing more inconvenient than a hang nail, temporarily. And that's another level upon which it sometimes is looked by some of the more advanced grays. In other words, they understand that the physical reality does by definition contain the potential to have pain in the situation for a variety of reasons, more often than not, from the suppressed fear idea that exists within humanity. But that is not a good enough reason for them not to do it because of what they understand will be the great benefit that the pain can be used to be transformed into eventually that will result for your society as well as for theirs. So in that sense, what you may simply say is that the ultimate benefits outweigh the temporary inconvenience of the terror. All right, so this is an effect, like a parent on this planet, a parent-child relationship. Yes. A very apt analogy. Where a parent smacks the child and says, well, I'm doing this for your benefit. Well, not exactly. Well, no, no, well, who's supposed to be? One more. One more? Not exactly. Because the idea in that scenario, the reasons for why such a scenario may exist there have more potential potential to come from devaluation and lack of understanding on the part of the parent and the child simultaneously, instead of finding another way to resolve that idea. I understand the context in which you mean it. But perhaps a more apt scenario might be the idea of taking the child to a doctor and knowing that even though the procedure that you may be subjecting the child to may be temporarily painful, you know that ultimately it is for their own good because it will heal them, even though they may be very frightened. they may be very frightened by the experience. Yes, that's a little bit more apt energetically because it contains fewer divergent possible reasons for why that might occur. Rather than the idea of physical harm in that sense has less opportunity to have in your terms a quote-unquote good reason for happening. Yeah, we want to smack be physical harm. Certainly the idea, yes, a physical impact that may be physically harming the body. Depends upon the scenario, of course, I understand. But simply put, in general terms, the idea of feeling the need to hit a child usually will have less opportunities for actually having a good reason than the idea of simply subjecting the child to a painful experience, such as a doctor for its own good. Well, I, you know, I've... Yes. Yes. Well, what's... Haring a child. Yes. Smacking a child. To me, that's, you know, it's like, you know, it's like, you know, it's like putting water in your face when you make it up in one. It's not like...

have less opportunities for actually having a good reason than the idea of simply subjecting the child to a painful experience, such as a doctor for its own good. Well, I, you know, I've... Yes. Yes. Well, what's... Haring a child. Yes. Smacking a child. To me, that's, you know, it's like, you know, it's like, you know, it's like putting water in your face when you make it up in one. It's not like... I understand that there are times in which it may, in a sense, be appropriate only on the same level and for the same reason as the idea that a Zen master may smack an acolyte. That's right. To bring it back to understanding. However, all I am saying is, while I understand the reason you use the analogy in that spirit, but we simply wish to add because we felt... it would be important to add, that there are not as many positive reasons for such an act as there might be for the other analogy we gave. Yes. You know, I understand what you're saying. And the interactions with Pilarians are not on this level. I mean, it's not like an reduction in nothing, you know what I mean? Yes, and so. I mean, you know, why is such a difference? You know what I'm talking about. If we're acting... Can I think... On the agenda of the grays is simply very different in terms of its historical context from the agenda of the Pleiabians. In the same way that why do you have the kinds of relations with one country than you do from another country. It is a different historical context. They are coming from a completely different understanding of history and their own experience as to what they think your relationship is all about as opposed to where the grays are coming from in general. That's why they're different people. They're different altogether in many ways. And what's the difference in the thought process? Between what you might call a gray and a Pleiadian? Yes. Gray, Pleiadian and human. The idea, perhaps, of the gray. Would that, in general, be the overall agenda of survival and continuation of the species from the damage it caused itself? The overall agenda of the human is the idea of the integration of all the things it has, suppressed within itself. The ultimate idea of the agenda of the Pleiadian is the willingness similar to some degree, but not on the same level, to allow there to be a balance in polarity. But still, the major agenda is to recognize that pain does not have to be experienced in their reality at this time, though they have to more broadly accept the idea that the polarity that you call negativity does have to be accepted as completely as the polarity you call unconditional love.

Pleiadian is the willingness similar to some degree, but not on the same level, to allow there to be a balance in polarity. But still, the major agenda is to recognize that pain does not have to be experienced in their reality at this time, though they have to more broadly accept the idea that the polarity that you call negativity does have to be accepted as completely as the polarity you call unconditional love. They are more similar to the human agenda than the grays may be in that context of thought process of how they see themselves, how they see you, how you see yourselves, how you see the others, how the grays see themselves, so on and so forth. And how do I see the interactions between grays and moons and the agenda of the hybrid program? The poor audience, how do they view all that? They view it ultimately from the positive point of view. coming from the high-density vibration that they do, they see the ultimate positive outcome because that is the domain in which they reside, and as such, that is the portion of the overall agenda they most commonly interact with. You understand that? In other words, like you, they see an experience, only what their vibration allows them to see an experience. So for the most part, they only experience the portion of the gray agenda that has what you would consider to be ultimately a beneficial outcome that they can interact. Exactly. Does that help you? Yes, it does. Thank you very much. At this time, like to, in speaking of holism, as you were, though we rarely do this. In this case, we find it has meaning and importance for this interaction and for many interactions taking place now. We will, in that sense, suggest a literary work that at this time, we perceive can be one of the most beneficial literary works that exists on your planet for the idea of getting in touch with all these things in a clear and constructive way. And that would be what you would call the book, Conversations with God, by the author Walsh. We will in this sense suggest and recommend at this time that of many of the idea of literary works on our planet that we have suggested, this one will be in terms of percentage, 100% clear. Read it. That is our strong suggestion at this time. It is the product of the collective consciousness of your planet, finally answering itself in as clear a way as possibly it can, you will recognize in the book that you are speaking for yourself. You will feel it. You will know the truth. It will help you. wake up. Read it. At this time, we extend once again to you. Our unconditional love and deep appreciation at the creativity of the creation of your reality that allows us to dream you into our reality.

planet, finally answering itself in as clear a way as possibly it can, you will recognize in the book that you are speaking for yourself. You will feel it. You will know the truth. It will help you. wake up. Read it. At this time, we extend once again to you. Our unconditional love and deep appreciation at the creativity of the creation of your reality that allows us to dream you into our reality. And we thank you for dreaming us into your own, or perhaps more precisely, for co-creating the new third, balanced, centered reality in which we both which we both interact as equals, and in every context in which it means something to you as unconditional lovers. Good day.