Thirty Points Of View (Part 2 of 4)

The state that is not of my preference, and yet I'm trying to make it of my preference, but... What is the state that you are in now that you have said is not the state of your preference? Sadness. All right. Yet, that is the state you are in, yes? Yes. Therefore, for the time being, it is obviously the state you prefer. Therein lies the paradox. Do not allow your language to confuse you. When we say it is not the state you prefer, that does not mean that it isn't the state that you prefer. When you experience something, the only way you can experience it is because for whatever reason to the best of your knowledge, it is the only state you are capable of preferring at that moment. The other use of the term preference is something else again. Therefore, let us make that division now. make that division now. Let us make it clear that when we talk about the idea of what it is you might ultimately prefer, that doesn't take away from the fact that whatever you are experiencing now is obviously what you prefer to experience or you wouldn't be experiencing it because everything you experience is by choice. So, do not get caught in the confusion by allowing those two different meanings of preference to come into conflict with one another, as if they were the same meaning. for they are not. It is only the limitations of the language of your planet that has allowed this concept to be translated in the same word and thus perhaps by implication and or inference it is thought by your people to have the same meaning. Is this making any sense to you? Yes. And if I could, I'd like to ask you for one other piece of advice on the male, the surviving male that was bonded to this female for at least... Yes. 10 years. Guys. Is there... You are the surviving male. It is the symbol of you. It is the symbol of you. It is the symbol of the experience of choice that you have created from time to time in your life, of feeling bereft of a female reflection. I lost... I know that that one ought to be clear to you, and that's probably why you lost it completely. Because it is the one that strikes closest to your heart. So we will say it again. the purpose of reclaiming it. The male bird in your terms has been bereft of a female companion, a female reflection. The polarity seemingly has become imbalanced. You follow along so far? Thus then is the reflection for you. As you have expressed many times, the idea of yourself as the lonely male as being out of yourself as the lonely male, as being out of touch with the feminine reference.

will say it again. the purpose of reclaiming it. The male bird in your terms has been bereft of a female companion, a female reflection. The polarity seemingly has become imbalanced. You follow along so far? Thus then is the reflection for you. As you have expressed many times, the idea of yourself as the lonely male as being out of yourself as the lonely male, as being out of touch with the feminine reference. as feeling cut off from the feminine side, whether in relationship or within yourself, is one of the symbols being acted out in this event and reflected to you. Does that make more sense now? Yes. Does that help you then have insight to see it this way? Yes. And to understand, as has been dialogued with you before, by another version of ourselves, to understand that that staying to some degree within the state of sadness that you feel is in and of itself all right because it is what you have chosen and it is only paradoxically by accepting the sadness as an all right way to feel that you will be capable of transforming it into joy but until you allow yourself to let it be all right to feel the sadness that you feel then you will not be capable of transforming it into joy so there are no shoulds and should not in this experience, only what is being pointed out to you in terms of how you have thought of yourself, how you have positioned yourself, and how you can use what it is you are choosing to benefit you, but the way to allow it to benefit you is not to deny what you are choosing. Do not deny the sadness in order to feel joy. That cannot happen. You must accept the sadness you have chosen to feel in order that what you have chosen can be chosen transformed into something else. But you cannot accept it only with the idea that the only condition that you will accept it on is that if it changes to something else, for then it is a conditional idea and it is not unconditional acceptance. Does that make sense to you? Yes. Does that help you then? Yes. But that still did not answer a question which I'm trying to get from you because I have no clear. You are trying to get a question from me. I'm trying to get a question from me. to get an answer from you on what would best serve the male parrot, not the reflection to me. I just told you. I will say it again in another way. What will best serve the male parrot when you understand it is a reflection for you is to incorporate within yourself your own feminine side instead of looking for it outside so that you cannot then be feeling bereft of the feminine polarity because it is contained. within you.

you on what would best serve the male parrot, not the reflection to me. I just told you. I will say it again in another way. What will best serve the male parrot when you understand it is a reflection for you is to incorporate within yourself your own feminine side instead of looking for it outside so that you cannot then be feeling bereft of the feminine polarity because it is contained. within you. This is what the male parrot is reflecting to you. And when you allow yourself to accept the reflection that is being given to you in service, then the male bird will not necessarily need to reflect the bereftment, bereavement, that it may be reflecting to you now, because it is only reflecting your own. Does that make more sense to you? So I don't, I should, I, that's yes and no, but I mean, in other words, I'm asking, in terms of three-dimensional physical reality, Should he, should I get him another mate? Should I get him another? You can, but do not allow yourself to assume that the outward symbol of doing that will be, shall we say, a finish and a resolvement or resolution to the idea going on within you, and you will find that it may not, shall we say, ease the bereavement, until the idea going on within you, and you will find that it may not, shall we say, ease the bereavement, until you yourself have more integration within yourself that can then be reflected by the parrot and the new mate back to you. For you may, in physical dimensional reality, as you put it, put a male bird and a female bird together, but it doesn't mean that a connection will ensue nor a relationship evolve if what they are attempting to reflect to you is the segregation and separation of that relationship within yourself. for until that healing takes place, no outward symbol will necessarily reflect the idea of bonding. Does that make sense to you? Yeah. Does that help you then? Well, how would you suggest I transform it? There are many ways, but we have already given you some suggestions, which obviously you have not heard. We will give you one more hint, and that is it. For that is the way. For that is the way. timing of this interaction and the personality you have called forth. Thank you. The one more hint is again, allow yourself more opportunity to accept the feelings that you have, whatever they may be at any given moment. Accepting them will be accepting yourself more and more, and the more you accept all of yourself in whatever form you may come, in whatever way you may experience yourself, yourself, the more you accept it, the more integration you will experience within yourself, and the more that can be reflected outwardly. Do you follow? I think so. All right. It will have to do for now.

whatever they may be at any given moment. Accepting them will be accepting yourself more and more, and the more you accept all of yourself in whatever form you may come, in whatever way you may experience yourself, yourself, the more you accept it, the more integration you will experience within yourself, and the more that can be reflected outwardly. Do you follow? I think so. All right. It will have to do for now. Thank you. Thank you. And the next. Good evening, Bashar. And do you a good day. I'm very impressed with number 11. And I hope I hope that you have access to the information on which I'm needing some help. I do not know, but I am number 17. We shall see. Oh, well, then I'm sure you do. Not necessarily. How do you know you don't need number 18 or 19 or 20? Oh, well, I don't know. I just feel more comfortable with 17. That is why you know you don't need 18, 19, and 20. And that is why 17 is what has been talking. is what has been called for. Good. Let us proceed. I want to refer back to something we've talked about before. Yes. Which is the southern Edshall-Hampton crop formation of the end of July this year, 1997. You discussed that with Bashar 15, yes. Can you remember it as number 17 or recall it or access it? I choose to. Good. At the time we discussed it, I guess this is the formation I'm closest to of this last season, and we had surveyed it in some detail and counted in the grid 26 squares along the northern side and 30 down the east side. Now, I've perceived that North normally means up, and I thought therefore that we had a calendar grid. But how? 26 units being half a year in weeks, and thus 26 by 30, meaning 15 years, which takes us to 2012. In one direction and in one recognition, this is so. But knowing that all these. These things are holographic. You know there are other things now that you are discovering that may be more germane. To who you are now and to who I am now. Right. Now what happened was that two days after counting it, I presented at the Glastonbury Crop Circle Conference the idea that it was a calendar grid. And this was taken very, very well by people, and it became a established as the calendar grid, I came back and started work on drawing up the grid, the formations of this year, leaving this one to the end because I found it rather complex. Yes! And I have given you a clue in this conversation as to why. Yes, I understand that. You gave me a clue in the last conversation. I did not ignore that.

taken very, very well by people, and it became a established as the calendar grid, I came back and started work on drawing up the grid, the formations of this year, leaving this one to the end because I found it rather complex. Yes! And I have given you a clue in this conversation as to why. Yes, I understand that. You gave me a clue in the last conversation. I did not ignore that. But when I started to draw it up last month, I found to my absolute astonishment, that it was not 26 on the north side and 30 on the east, it was 30 on the north and 26 on the east. All right. Now, I had been so convinced of this, that it appeared to me that this formation had gone through some kind of dimensional. Yes. Yes. 90 degree vector. So I went back to all the photographs. Yes. And I counted. Yes. And of course, it was 26 on the east and 30 on the north. But I remember going along the north side and counting 26. And so you did. In one reality of the holographic stack. It is not a flat diagram. It is not a flat matrix. It is a holographic cube. There's more than one north side. There's more than one east, more than one west, more than one south. You allowed yourself to enter the doorway that allowed you to perceive a parallel reality. It is, after all, a symbol of parallel paths. It is a parallel matrix, holographic, parallel reality, representation. Are you beginning to see this and experience this now? But one, yes, of course, of course. But what you are therefore saying is that when, on July the 31st, I counted the northern edge of that square with other people there. So, did we not already? Or shall we say did not? Bashar's 15, 14, and 13, already discuss many times with many of you that time and space are not what they used to be, that they are becoming unstuck and glued and shall be shifting more frequently. This is one of the ways. North shall not be north. East shall not be east, west shall not be west, south shall not be south, up shall not be up and up, down, shall not be down, though they will be each other from time to time. And they will be themselves, when they shall be themselves, but taking their cue from you and your orientation. No longer are the orientations outside, the orientations are inside, and this gives you the vital clue as to your state of being in relation to the holography cube as to which side you see, what direction you see, which orientation you approach it from, and what is germane to you. Time and space are coming unstuck because time and space are your inventions anyway. They do not exist without you. These are arbitrary lines, limitations, structures.

are the orientations outside, the orientations are inside, and this gives you the vital clue as to your state of being in relation to the holography cube as to which side you see, what direction you see, which orientation you approach it from, and what is germane to you. Time and space are coming unstuck because time and space are your inventions anyway. They do not exist without you. These are arbitrary lines, limitations, structures. You have now found that out with a device such as this matrix, because it is a matrix, because it is a Because it is the parallel reality matrix that opens many doors and in which the hinges to these doors are greatly oiled so that they swing freely. Is this making some sense to you? Oh, yes. But. But! But, but, but, but, but... Here is... Herein lies... Herein lies... Yes. The most difficult question. The most difficult question. The most difficult question. would be what? I've been drawing these crop circles for years. Yes. This is the most difficult one I've ever, ever had to deal with. I can't draw it. Well, you wanted a challenge, didn't you? Didn't we say that this would be the grid that would allow you the opportunity to truly understand the fundamental template? Yes. Well, now that you have your hands on the fundamental template, template, the fundamental template being truly fundamental and underlying all possible parallel realities you can experience in your universe of experiential reality. Did you think it would be simple? No. You wanted it to be challenging so that you could see it from all sides, so that you could discover new things. Did you not want it to have many facets and many doorways through which you could look? Yes. Then you got your wish, didn't you? Yes. And do they not say on your planet, be careful what you wish for, Careful what you wish for, for you will get it. Well, you got it. Okay. It is your bed. Now lying. Yes, all right. Well, I thank you for that. Are you still number 17? I am still number 17. Can I give you another question about another formation? You can. You can. You can give me all the questions you wish to give me. I have this nice little box that I can put them all in and wrap it up. Okay. Okay. The Milk Hill fractal formation. Abade the iterations of an absolutely accurate coch fractal fractal for three steps. And at what was to be the fourth step, it stopped, working with hard edge. hard edge triangles and surrounded itself with small circles. Yes. Now, I didn't understand this for a long time, but then I realized, yes. In what way do you understand it, and I will share with you how we understand it? Good.

The Milk Hill fractal formation. Abade the iterations of an absolutely accurate coch fractal fractal for three steps. And at what was to be the fourth step, it stopped, working with hard edge. hard edge triangles and surrounded itself with small circles. Yes. Now, I didn't understand this for a long time, but then I realized, yes. In what way do you understand it, and I will share with you how we understand it? Good. Well, I realized that the larger of those surrounding circles mark exactly the position where the next iteration, the fourth iteration of smaller triangles would occur and they in fact have the diameter of the side of one of those triangles. All right, but they are not triangles. No. What do you understand about why this is so? Well, my crude and mechanical understanding being an earthling in this dimension is that... Do not, as you say, put yourself down. Okay. Elevate yourself. Okay. At that point, it seemed to me that to take the triangles one step further, that is to make the triangles one-third of the next size, would be pushing the technology of crop bending to its absolute limit. Nonsense. time. And it still is. But not in the reality that you exist in now. It is correct for one reality, but you don't live there anymore, so it won't work here. Let's have another. Shall we? Well, it seemed that there is no accident about the fact that the diameter of the circle in that position is the same dimension as the triangle which might have been in that position. And so that tells you that it's certainly based on a continuation of the matrix. of the matrix, but is not a continuation of the matrix. Exactly so. Something has shifted. Yes, and what do you imagine that would be? Time and space. And why do you imagine that would have happened? Why? Yes, why? Why? One, two, three, and then four goes out the window. The third dimension. But there is something else. Well, we've reached the end of three. Yes. Are we coming to four, which is different? Yes. And this is all based on what is the simplest possible structure? What is the simplest possible template? What is the simplest possible fundamental principle upon which this is all based? The tetrahedron? Yes, and leading to the spiral, and so you see therein the idea of the tetrahedron, then going into circular formations. But what is more simple than that? Is it time for a clue? Yeah. The four laws. What is the first law? You exist. What is the second law? All is one and one is all. What is the third law? And what's the fourth one? The only constant is change. Yes. Therefore, one, two, three, invariant. Number four. Change.

and so you see therein the idea of the tetrahedron, then going into circular formations. But what is more simple than that? Is it time for a clue? Yeah. The four laws. What is the first law? You exist. What is the second law? All is one and one is all. What is the third law? And what's the fourth one? The only constant is change. Yes. Therefore, one, two, three, invariant. Number four. Change. So therein you have in that symbol the first four absolutes interwoven and the depiction of the tetrahedral structure that then leads to the sacred spiral that spins off into circles and the symbolism of going from third dimensionality to fourth density. And simultaneously you also have the energy realities, the energy realities, the thought bubbles, the discrete universes that are spun off as the energy field of the double interpenetrated tetrahedrons called the stella octangula. Do you follow that? Yes. Yes. Because the stellar octangula as two, one up, one facing down, interpenetrating tetrahedrons in rotation, rotation. has an energy field that is composed in a sense in your dimension of spheres. Each sphere being its own discrete bubble reality. These bubble realities are infinite in number. That being depicted in the crop circle, wheat fields would have been the limit of the technology, yes. For those fields are not infinite in scope. But the first layer was laid down to demonstrate the point. the point of the generation of infinite numbers of reality bubbles that are generated by the interpenetration of what is above and what is below. And so that symbol is all these things and more. Does this help you? One small final question. One small final question. I believe there is still some room in my box for one small final question for me to stuff in there, yes? We've understood. Thank you. Why it went down in three iterations via the triangle and ended with the circle in the position where the triangle might have been? Why were there smaller circles in between all the big circles? I have already told you there are iterations and iterations and iterations that cannot be seen in that diagram, but it lets you know that as above, so below, infinitely, bigger, infinitely smaller in all directions simultaneously, and that one reality is connected to the next, because all are one. Does that make any sense? Yeah. Does it make enough sense, or is there something that seems to be missing from this definition of the larger and the smaller circles? I would have thought that if it was symbolic, as you say, of the infinity of possibility, Yes. Yes. That would have been. That would have been demonstrated. In what other way? More small circles. Why should there be more? Because we have passed through the fourth iteration with the big circle. Yes. And then I would imagine there would be a complete, if I was designing it.

of the larger and the smaller circles? I would have thought that if it was symbolic, as you say, of the infinity of possibility, Yes. Yes. That would have been. That would have been demonstrated. In what other way? More small circles. Why should there be more? Because we have passed through the fourth iteration with the big circle. Yes. And then I would imagine there would be a complete, if I was designing it. Oh, if you were designing it, well, I'll let you know you did. All of you did. It comes out of your consciousness, remember. It is made with you. within the fabric and the medium of your consciousness, remember? And so you did have a hand in designing it, so that's what came out. So I'm criticizing myself. I would say at that stage, what is hypothetically the fifth stage, the small circles would be scattered like confetti. In some senses, this is so. However, we wanted you and you wanted you to appreciate the discrete individual. individuality that altogether forms the collective of fourth density. And so did not want you to be scattered in all the little circles, but wanted you to say, why only one? Because one is enough. Because each of you are enough as individuals to impact the whole. That's why we wanted to bring your attention, and you wanted to bring your attention down to focusing on the idea of the one is enough. The individual is enough. It is sufficient to cause massive change, massive transformation. transformation. That's why there's only one little one in between. Okay. Because one is enough. Each and every one of you is that one. And each and every one of you are enough to cause a change in the whole. Does that make more sense now? Absolutely. Does that help you then? Thank you, number 17. Thank you. Number 45. Bashar. You and then you. Good day, Bashar. And you good day. I have a few. few questions. The first is about my mother. She has an arthritic condition. Arthritic condition. Yeah, and at least it's painless, but it's drawing her fingers up. She's had a surgery and it actually made things, I guess, a little worse. It is not that in any way, shape or form. The idea of your technology is that which we would disclaim or put down, as you say. down, as you say, but it is, as always in our estimation, perhaps the wisest to be the more natural before going to such extremes. For there is not but anything in nature that will alleviate anything that is out of balance, everything can be found therein, for it was designed as such, and this you know.

form. The idea of your technology is that which we would disclaim or put down, as you say. down, as you say, but it is, as always in our estimation, perhaps the wisest to be the more natural before going to such extremes. For there is not but anything in nature that will alleviate anything that is out of balance, everything can be found therein, for it was designed as such, and this you know. Thus then there are those elements that that require the body to be replenished in what you call the mineral and the enzymatica and all of those formations of molecular structure to be found naturally in the body that when replenished and replaced will allow for the proper function of such. And what sort of replacement is she in need of? What sort of information may I offer her? There will be many works upon your planet that will be in evidence for your research into the natural minerals that are now being expounded that are the essential oils of various substances, especially those that are in your terminology the long carbon chain, essential fatty acids that are most closely linked with the carbon chain of 24 you find in your human brain. human brain. These will be the fish oils and those things that shall replenish in the body, the long carbon chains to allow for appropriate lubrication and enzymatic interface and interaction. Thank you. That brought up, I wasn't going to ask, but it brought up the fact that I had surgery this year, and I felt pretty good about it. As I have said, it is not wild to deny anything, for there is a time and a place for everything that exists within your sphere of reality. It is simply more a matter of making sure that right is applied to right situation rather than running to this or that first, but to simply make an honest assessment of that which is most appropriate for the situation as it is deemed within your honest reflection and research before you. proceed. Is that clear to you? Yes, that's clear. And I wanted to ask, it seems to be a core issue of mine. I may get emotional. It is, as usual with your species in this time of transition, that the emotions are stuffed into the core, and so when you approach the core, the emotions will out. Let them be, let them flow, it is wisest to allow this process to unfold, be as emotional as you desire to be, for therein lies a true access to the core of your being. And this is the telltale, signs by which you know you have breached the core of your essence. Thank you. How may we assist in the comfort and aid of the process of your emotionality and the definitions that lie under the that lie underneath them. It's my imagination and my creativity. Your imagination and your creativity.

emotional as you desire to be, for therein lies a true access to the core of your being. And this is the telltale, signs by which you know you have breached the core of your essence. Thank you. How may we assist in the comfort and aid of the process of your emotionality and the definitions that lie under the that lie underneath them. It's my imagination and my creativity. Your imagination and your creativity. How and in what way do these ideas trouble you? I felt as a child in kindergarten when asked to draw that they had been stolen. That your imagination and your ability had been stolen. Well, I was without imagination and imagination and creativity. This idea itself comes from your creative imagination for how otherwise could it be? That you could conceive of such an idea that your talent has been stolen except from your imagination and creativity. Thus you are using your creative imagination to make it seem as if you have none, and that is a very creative thing to do. It's not useful. It is useful. It is useful. for all things are useful. It simply required that it needed to be pointed out to you that you were doing thus and thus it becomes useful and now that you know you have used your creative imagination to make it seem as if you have none and that is a useful thing to know. And now therein that you know this you can decide in what other way to use your creative imagination that you have now discovered you have never been without. Thank you.