Part 1
Taddeo, we have another question from one of our viewers. All right. And this question has to do with animal consciousness. Animal consciousness. And the question is essentially, are animals like humans in the sense that their consciousness continues to exist beyond the time that they are here on this planet? And then do they reincarnate as humans or what is their trajectory in the in the whole scheme of things? Yes, they exist beyond the physical as anything does, because physical is the temporary manifestation. They do not reincarnate as humans, per se. The idea, of course, again, is that everything exists simultaneously. So even the term reincarnation is misleading. Whatever is a thing is that thing. There can be interconnections. There can be energetic. linkages. There can be experiential continuity connections that can make different levels of consciousness seem to evolve from one to another. But everything that exists already as its unique expression of creation. And in that sense, the idea of a linear incarnation or an evolution through incarnation to some degree is an illusion. It doesn't work that way mechanically, but you can create the experience as if it does. So what you call animal consciousness, that facet of the multidimensional crystal that expresses itself that way, can certainly create an experience for itself that makes it seem as if it's having a human incarnation. But it doesn't exactly happen that way in the way that you might think it physically. So they are really distinctly different than human consciousness? The very definition of human consciousness, the very definition, animal consciousness creates the difference. Of course, everything comes from source, and on the highest level in the one, there is no differentiation at all. There is no between this and that. There is no this and that. In the one, there's no differentiation, but there's also no awareness of self. The one must split into the all that is before it can have those differentiation reflections. And when it splits, in a sense, when it experiences itself, as more than the one, as reflected, when it knows itself, when it becomes aware of itself, that instantaneously creates multitudinous facets of all the ways it can express itself in order to represent it as all that is. And each facet is unique, and each facet needs to be there. One thing cannot become another, or you lose that facet. That facet is needed for all that is to be, all that is. But it can have interconnections. It can create experiences that may make it seem as if it's doing that, but that doesn't change the fact that that experience is being had by that unique facet, which is always that unique facet. Does that make sense? Yes, and I know that for the longest time on this planet, the perception has always been that humans were, in a sense, put here to dominate or control animals, or that's the relationship that has. evolved with nature.
Part 2
that may make it seem as if it's doing that, but that doesn't change the fact that that experience is being had by that unique facet, which is always that unique facet. Does that make sense? Yes, and I know that for the longest time on this planet, the perception has always been that humans were, in a sense, put here to dominate or control animals, or that's the relationship that has. evolved with nature. Yes, but that's actually not a relationship with nature. That's a relationship with normalization. If you had a true relationship with nature, you would all interact with the animals in a much more egalitarian way. And in many cases, even though many humans think that they're smarter than animals, many humans have a long way to go to reach the level of intelligence expressed by the animal kingdom. remember that just because an animal consciousness may use all of its intelligence in a focused way doesn't mean it's less intelligent just because it doesn't think like a human. It's just that its intelligence is focused in a very pure direction. You follow? Yes, and the fact that many animals express levels of unconditional love that are perhaps beyond. Yes, it's also been a misunderstanding that just because different brain sizes exist, it means that, again, they don't have certain capacities. But you must understand they simply don't need certain things. And it doesn't matter if a brain is smaller than yours, because if all their intelligence is focused in a certain way, they don't necessarily need the rest of the brain because they're not interested in processing in the way that you do. And I noticed that on your planet, you don't have pets, right? No, we have relationships and interactions with the animals that exist in our world in a symbiotic way. They may come and go. Some of them, as you say in your language, may choose to hang around with us, but that doesn't make them our pets, so to speak. It just makes them another relationship. It just makes them our friends. It just makes them our family. And is that a probable direction that will go on here on Earth? There is a high degree of, probability that you will eventually express that kind of relationship with the animals on your planet, yes. And experience a more symbiotic existence with animals? You are already seeing more symbiosis. You have many, many examples now in your video recordings of animals that you are, shall we say, previously assumed to be enemies that are now interacting with each other as friends. You see this now all the time in many of your recordings. Species that you would think would never associate are associating with each other. which gives you an indication that this is probable and already changing. So it's really the changes in our predatory nature that then bring about a more symbiotic experience of animals. Yes.
Part 3
are, shall we say, previously assumed to be enemies that are now interacting with each other as friends. You see this now all the time in many of your recordings. Species that you would think would never associate are associating with each other. which gives you an indication that this is probable and already changing. So it's really the changes in our predatory nature that then bring about a more symbiotic experience of animals. Yes. If you want to say in any way, shape, or form, quote unquote, that humanity dominates the animal kingdom, well, the idea really is more of an expression that they simply take their cue from you because you're running a certain program, you're running a certain theme, and they're more than happy to reflect to you the things that are paramount or dominant in the themes you're exploring. And if one of the themes that you've explored is your predatory nature or being predatory, they are happy to reflect that back to you. But as soon as you become more symbiotic, so do they. Because you see, they don't have the same agendas. Thank you. Thank you, Taddea. That's wonderful. You are welcome, Nania.