Part 1
Hello, Bashar. I know you good day. My question has to do with fractality, torsion fields, and golden mean spirals, and basically holiday in relation with duality, divinity, and free will. Oh, all right. Thank you. I'm basically wanting to know if, this is really hard to kind of get out, but I'm wanting to know if all universes in existence all run on that platform of energetic, um, layout, I guess, that's what you'd say is, one way or another, in that fabric or system. All things that you would call any kind of expression of reality, dimension of experience whatsoever, exhibits polarity. Because the idea is that there is the one, which is, in and of itself, homogenous and contains no experience whatsoever and no self-awareness whatsoever, because it is, truly the unbroken one. But within the one is the first recognition of otherness. And that first reflection of the other is what created all that is, the perspective of otherness. And as all that is, all that is recognizes that it is literally all things within creation. All things are made of it. That's the first duality. And therefore, every dimension experiences the idea of duality. but, of course, experiences that duality and polarity in varying ways, to varying degrees, depending upon what's relevant for that particular dimension of experience. The idea of fractal underpinnings and golden spirals do exist for many different kinds of template universes, though not necessarily is it expressed in every dimension that you would understand in exactly the same way. It is an underpinning of sorts. It is a template of sorts. But the idea is expressed, in ways that sometimes would be absolutely unrecognizable to you in your reality, in your universe. Does that make sense in your language? Yes, it does. So would duality then basically be as, we're always going to experience duality in one form or another, no matter what existence we're in? Yes, because the very idea of reflection implies duality of this and of that. You understand? So the idea is that it won't necessarily be experienced in the same way you experience it, but it will always be recognized as part of the fabric, part of the makeup, part of the structure, part of the template of any given reality or any given experience, just by the very definition of recognizing that one of the four laws is simply that the one is all, the all is one. And since that is one of the four laws, laws with a capital L that never change in that sense, then it is true across the board in every single possible experience that can be had. within creation. Does that make sense? Yes, it does. Is that answering the question specifically enough, or is there some other avenue you wish to walk down on this particular subject? There's one thing that's slightly related. It has to do with the Akashik record.
Part 2
the four laws, laws with a capital L that never change in that sense, then it is true across the board in every single possible experience that can be had. within creation. Does that make sense? Yes, it does. Is that answering the question specifically enough, or is there some other avenue you wish to walk down on this particular subject? There's one thing that's slightly related. It has to do with the Akashik record. It's one thing that I'm kind of curious about. All right. I've seen you tune into the Akashik records before, and I thought that was very interesting and amazing. Well, all right, but let's stop you right there for one moment, because this is another wonderful example of the idea of what we might call an old-fashioned definition that no longer really serves you. We understand what you mean by Akashik records, but if you actually stop to think about it for a moment, since you know everything exists here and now, nothing needs to be recorded. Everything is always accessible, and that is what you mean by the Akashic records. It's not some mysterious place you have to go to to find a recording of an event. All events always exist. So all you have to do is tune yourself to the frequency of a particular concept of an event, time, and space, and you will access whatever information is relevant for that. But that's because everything exists here and now, not because it's actually recorded somewhere. So is it possible for you right now to do what you do when you claim to tap in? What do you think I'm doing? And what I'm asking you, can you actually pull in right now and say my name? If it's relevant, if it is not relevant, you must have. understand how these rules function. Mostly it is like what you call water or electricity, and it follows the path of least resistance. Why do I need to go into the Akashik records, so to speak, to find out your name when all I need to do is ask you? I'm just wondering if it's possible. That's all I'm wondering. Listen, anything is possible. Anything is possible. What I'm saying, the question is not, is it possible? The question is, is it probable? Is it relevant? The answer is no. Because it's easier, the path of least resistance is to simply say, what's your name? And have you answer it? And in a sense, you could say that by doing that, we have access the so-called Akashik records because that information is existing here and now. And I have taken the path of least resistance, which is to simply ask you your name. Understood? There is no need to go into stretching yourself to do it any other way if you simply have access to the information. in the reality you're in. Okay. Make sense? Yes, it does. Thank you very much, Bashar. Thank you.
Part 3
that, we have access the so-called Akashik records because that information is existing here and now. And I have taken the path of least resistance, which is to simply ask you your name. Understood? There is no need to go into stretching yourself to do it any other way if you simply have access to the information. in the reality you're in. Okay. Make sense? Yes, it does. Thank you very much, Bashar. Thank you. Thank you. If we may continue this for a moment briefly, you see, this is what goes on when individuals in your society think about the idea of, quote-unquote, testing, psychic ability. They will often not understand the laws of psychic functioning, and they will often not understand the laws of psychic functioning, and they will think, that they set up their tests in a certain way that is somehow representative of how these things work when very often it's not at all. And if they don't understand such things as the law of the path of least resistance, then they will always be, in a sense, confused by why they do not necessarily get the results that they wish to get. Because again, if you are asking someone, well, can you tell me with your psychic powers what is on this card I'm looking at, the path of least resistance is to simply ask the person look at. at the card. Therefore, why does it have to initiate any other level of intuition when the answer is right in front of the face of the person sitting across from you? That's the path of least resistance. So the person who is looking at the card is actually short-circuiting the ability of the other person to get it any other way. That's how it works.