Hologram (Part 1 of 3)

All right, allow me to say, how are you all this evening of your time as you create time to exist? Before we begin, the idea of discussion will all be the briefest opportunity to remind each and every one of you. That was ensuring that we are now conducting in this matter is the opportunity for each and every one of you to act upon your own knowingness of yourself. yourself, to act out your own intuitions, your own imaginations, to know that you are, the beings that you have chosen to be in this life exactly as you find yourself to be. Each and every one of you, being the path that you are, will be able to view how each and every one of you can act out that path within time. path within conscious knowingness, allowing yourself the freedom of the opportunity to become, to become the ideas that you have previously held to be something that you have within you. But now you can grant yourselves the opportunity, the joyous opportunity to know that you actually are, those ideas and can act accordingly. accordingly to the idea you are now willing to allow yourself to know yourself to be as your unique, expressive, creative, and infinitely joyful facet of the all that is that you are. Do you all for the one? Yes. Sharing. For sure. Yes. Um. First of all, I'd like to thank you for being here in two weeks that I've been here. I have been tremendously excited about everything I've learned already. We will extend our appreciation in your co-creation of the sharing between our consciousness and your consciousness, which allows you to know of your own conscious expansion, which to us is a gift we will thank you. Yes, good. I have a question that has several parts to it. All right. It's related to the specific whole concepts that you mentioned last time, and he said there were only very few that are also chooses. And I was wondering, could you expand on that, tell us, which those specific whole concepts were. And then I'd like to ask about methodologies. All right, it is not specific in that way that there are only a few things to choose from. Simply what we are referring to is that the over-souled self, soul self chooses the concept that will be dealt with, but your mental self, that would you consider to be a product of your personality, chooses the methodology by which you will examine the concept in physical life. Could you tell us what those concepts are? There are many. Again, it is not that there is a limitation of concepts. We are simply allowing you to understand in this way that the over-soul self chooses the chooses the general concept. Let us say the idea of exploring self-empowerment through abundance. Now, an individual's personality and mentality methodology may be to go about exploring this idea in many ways.

the concept in physical life. Could you tell us what those concepts are? There are many. Again, it is not that there is a limitation of concepts. We are simply allowing you to understand in this way that the over-soul self chooses the chooses the general concept. Let us say the idea of exploring self-empowerment through abundance. Now, an individual's personality and mentality methodology may be to go about exploring this idea in many ways. Can be through the expression of polarities positive and negative. Can be through many different avenues and interactions with different other individuals. It is up to the personality to determine the methodology. to determine the methodology by which the whole consciousness will explore the idea of the relationship to the concept of abundance, but it is the over-souled choice to explore that idea. Right. Now, there's any particular methodology, if you have one methodology with that, can you infer which concept that you're exploring when you, if you're not looking my life and I say, well, this is my methodology. the methodology I've chosen in this particular month or so to explore a concept. Can I infer what the concept is? By using your imagination, yes. Your imagination is the tool and the translation device at the bridge and the link between your physical personality and the over-souled self, the dream conscious inn. Could you perhaps explain, I assume that drug addiction, for example, is a methodology that a lot of people are using, are using right now. Yes. Can be for many reasons. Can be for the individual to explore the overall concept of their own self-empowerment and responsibility and reliability on themselves without the idea of needing a tool. Can be the exploration of the idea of separation of the self and discovering many portions of the self hidden within the personality as you create those different levels within your consciousness and may find that this is a methodology for bringing some of them to the search. some of them to the surface? You follow me? Yes. Many, many, many ideas can be being explored with that methodology. Oh, okay. Thank you. Thank you. Chairman. Yes. You. Okay. You here. Then you. I talked to you last week about my situation and I should advise me to do what I would. suggest. We do not advise, we suggest. Oh, okay. I just said, yes. I went to this particular house, but the next day I found out with the people who are buying the house, even if they buy it. Yes. Well, so it just seems... As we also suggested, did we not, that this might be one of the possibilities. Yes, but there are no alternatives now. There are always alternatives. I mean, there are many alternatives, I'm sure, but there were not... Oh, but not one I think I should have. Expectation upon your life. Expectation upon your life. life is what you are doing for yourself.

house, even if they buy it. Yes. Well, so it just seems... As we also suggested, did we not, that this might be one of the possibilities. Yes, but there are no alternatives now. There are always alternatives. I mean, there are many alternatives, I'm sure, but there were not... Oh, but not one I think I should have. Expectation upon your life. Expectation upon your life. life is what you are doing for yourself. Understand if you realize there are always alternatives, the whole idea is allowing those alternatives to be the alternatives you want because they exist in your reality. If they were not the ones you chose, they would not be able to be perceived by you. I mean there are no interruptions in your life. There is nothing extraneous. nothing extraneous in your life. There is no slop in your life. There is nothing that is in your life without a reason for being there. It may be to teach you that you do not need patience if you are willing to enjoy your life and everything in it. Understand that if you are busy enjoying yourself, you do not need patience which then creates impatience. Need of patience is what creates impatience. Now, understand therefore, then we suggest you allow what alternatives you can perceive to be the alternatives you chose to explore. And then you will understand that by dropping your expectation, you may allow yourself to see how one of these alternatives that does not seem connected to where you think you want to go may get you there quicker than any expectation you created. Because you will be busy enjoying yourself. As you say, time flies when you are having fun. You will not notice the passage of time. Things will happen very quickly. You will accelerate. And lo and behold, as you say, you will find yourself at the place you wanted to be all along without ever having paid attention to exactly how you got there. How you got there, you are going to put yourself on automatic pilot by enjoying your life as you created. So would you suggest that I just take whatever... What? Allow me to suggest that you do whatever you feel like doing. Wait, whatever alternatives you have created and attracted to yourself. Follow your intuition, follow your excitement, follow your curiosity. All right. Then it will not be a difficult decision. You will be acting on your instinct. Follow me. Why? It is up to you. Right? Yes. Oh, right, oh, right. Maybe curious. Oh, why? Okay. Well, it's kind of like her question. Sometimes life is really fun, you know, you do something and I might think, well, gee, or what I'm like, maybe what excites me the most is go to the beach, so I do that and I have fun. Yes. And, you know, I was doing this for a while.

me. Why? It is up to you. Right? Yes. Oh, right, oh, right. Maybe curious. Oh, why? Okay. Well, it's kind of like her question. Sometimes life is really fun, you know, you do something and I might think, well, gee, or what I'm like, maybe what excites me the most is go to the beach, so I do that and I have fun. Yes. And, you know, I was doing this for a while. Like, seemed like, every moment, as soon as I finished one thing, something else would affect me. Yes. And it was just, like, rolling for like a week. It's like, every moment was thrilling. Yes. Yes. It was thrilling, dressing my teeth, whatever was exactly what I wanted to do at that moment. Yes. Yes. And then right now I feel disappointed because wife doesn't feel that way. It's like, oh, oh, one more. Allow me to suggest that it's simply because you have now increased your scope of things, of ideas, of concepts. And in this way, you are still putting expectation upon what you are creating in the matter that you think they should be like what you experienced as joyful before. Yeah. Yeah. Recognize, if you allow yourself to recognize everything in your life as an opportunity, it will always be joyful whether or not you are actually experiencing or creating what you deem to be physiological joy during the experience or not. Yeah. There are many types of joy. It does not mean that you are not having a good time if you are not giggling at the top of your lungs. Yeah. Follow me. Yeah, I follow. I just like, you know, I like to jump up and down. You know, I like... Well, then feel free to jump up and down any kind you wish. Okay. You can, you know, no matter what you are doing. Yeah. Okay. All right. Then, let me just add one more to that one. Because I was thinking, like, sometimes, like, I remember it last week, it was about 20 minutes when I was really bored. And, like, nothing excited me, you know? Why did you not listen to the silence? There is much information in silence. I guess I didn't. I don't know. Because you were judging the idea that that type of silence was not worth anything. You're right. Could have been simply for the opportunity for you to rest. Could have been, yeah. All right. One more. All right. The other day, a couple of weeks ago, you were, there was a Monday night channeling, and you were talking to a lady there, but anyway, you asked her question, and her answer was, I am all that is, and I've heard people say that. I'm like, what the hell is that name, you know? Exactly what it says. Well, like when I look at it, I don't look at myself as all that is. Why not?

day, a couple of weeks ago, you were, there was a Monday night channeling, and you were talking to a lady there, but anyway, you asked her question, and her answer was, I am all that is, and I've heard people say that. I'm like, what the hell is that name, you know? Exactly what it says. Well, like when I look at it, I don't look at myself as all that is. Why not? Because I feel more like a fragment. I don't feel like all that is. Understand the idea, do you, of a hologram? No. I don't know what that word. In your society, the idea you call hologram is a three-dimensional picture. Oh, yeah, I know, though. Created by the device you know to be laser. All right. In this way, understand that it is created by what you call an interference pattern. That is, it is a series of overlapping wave fronts that create a particular build-up, if you will, of image in a certain fashion that it is omnidirectional in nature. In this way, you can take your hologram, you can cut it in half, and you will have two whole holograms, not half and half. Because to a certain extent, major portions of the hologram contain the information of the total hologram. In this way, In this way, you can understand that the universe is like unto this idea, holographic, the potential for every point in the universe to express every other point is equal. The potential for any object to exist at every point exists equally at every point. Every point is reflected in every other point. In your mythology, in the area you call ancient India, you have, You have an analogy that is called Indra's net. It is a net made of reflective pearls. Each pearl being spherical, 360 degrees, three-dimensionally, and perfectly reflective, will pick up an image of every other pearl in the net. Thus, it can be said that each pearl does contain the sum of the total net. Likewise are you, and every being, within all that is, even though it is a fragment, it contains the potential of the whole. And because the idea of potential is only an expression in a time frame, and to all that is, time does not matter that much, and everything is simultaneous, then you can understand that to all that is, and its point of view, potential is real. real. You are all that is equally as much as you are a fragment of all that is. Paradox, maybe. Yeah. But only from your perspective. Okay. Will that have clarified the idea to some extent? That clarifies it to a great together, but I know I said I only had two, but I got another one. Oh, right. You know, I've been really attracted to read the New Testament these days, and I was reading it. Yes.

all that is equally as much as you are a fragment of all that is. Paradox, maybe. Yeah. But only from your perspective. Okay. Will that have clarified the idea to some extent? That clarifies it to a great together, but I know I said I only had two, but I got another one. Oh, right. You know, I've been really attracted to read the New Testament these days, and I was reading it. Yes. And it was interesting, but I have a friend who comes by who is a judge, who was witness, and we talk to about it, and I keep having the feeling that there's something there, but it's not, but I have a hard time believing that somebody would come to earth and say that you have to, like, believe in me and I'll save you from your sins. Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh. That being did not say that. Well, see, that's what I wanted to know, is if you knew, because I had a feeling when I was reading wasn't what you really said, and I was wondering if you could give me a brief idea. Understand, first of all, that in what you know to be written literature, literature representing what that specific being said or did not say. All that which you possess in your society that comprises written literature is approximately no more than 20% of all that was said. And much of what is written is not what was said, but an interpretation of what was said. Based upon the understanding of the individuals who heard it. Understand in this way, the being you refer to simply knew that, like themselves, all beings were of the same level and could express the idea of the Christ consciousness through themselves as he had done. The idea is simply that as you allow you allow yourself to be like this vibration that I am expressing to you. So you shall be like unto the idea of having what you turn to be heaven on earth. You will be of the vibration of that idea you call harmony. You follow me. Yeah, I can. Thank you. Yes. Yes. Well, I want to thank you for this week. Because this would be much better regarding my fears. Oh, thank you. But there's a question I have about, you know when... One moment, please. Will you do me a favor? I don't want to stand up. No, no, no. You do not have to stand up. Realize, even if I ask you to stand up, you do not have to stand up. However, this is a very small favor. Consists of three little letters, one tiny word in your language. in your language. Yeah. I have such and such, as you say, with my fears, not but. Ah, okay. I guess. Thank you. So end. Yes.

don't want to stand up. No, no, no. You do not have to stand up. Realize, even if I ask you to stand up, you do not have to stand up. However, this is a very small favor. Consists of three little letters, one tiny word in your language. in your language. Yeah. I have such and such, as you say, with my fears, not but. Ah, okay. I guess. Thank you. So end. Yes. I'd like to know, you know, like, when your imagination goes wild sometimes, like I had fears, and I'd see like all times maybe an army coming into my house and, you know, killing me all kinds of ways. Yes. All kinds of ways. way. Yes. Killing you with kindness, perhaps. No, I never saw that. Oh, why not? Just an expression you have upon your planet. Alright, proceed. Okay. And, you know, you have those pictures in the imagination. You have imagination. Yes. And also when you have feelings about something, you have pictures to feel something. Sometimes. Sometimes. I, regarding my fears, you know, that the part of the fears. Department of fear? Oh, alright. Very good. How, I'd like to know, an exercise or something that could help me to see the difference between feeling something is going to happen, really. Or I'm just letting my imagination going over. All right. Now, do you remember, or have you in this way, allowed us to suggest to you? the idea that we call the library analogy. All right. Simply this, all of the ideas, all the pictures that you contain your imagination are like a library. Full of books. You may always go into that library. You may sit there as long as you wish. You may read every book, good and bad, as you say, positive and negative, joyful and fearful that exists within that library. You do not have to check them out. have to check them out until you choose to. You may simply know that everything you experience within your pictorial imagination is because you are willing on some level to experience that idea. Just because you are picturing it in your imagination does not mean you are saying that that is something you want to enact in your physical reality. The two are not necessarily connected. One does not necessarily I'll say forego the other. Okay. You can simply know that you are in your library reading all these fascinating books, positive and negative. And when you leave your library, what will be your physical reality will be the books you choose consciously to check out with you. Wow. Thank you. Yes, yes. If one does experience something in one's imagination, would... the conscious knowledge that one has lived out whatever that was in one's imagination, would knowing that alleviate the idea of needing to experience it physically? Yes. Sometimes, yes. Okay, I had another question.

positive and negative. And when you leave your library, what will be your physical reality will be the books you choose consciously to check out with you. Wow. Thank you. Yes, yes. If one does experience something in one's imagination, would... the conscious knowledge that one has lived out whatever that was in one's imagination, would knowing that alleviate the idea of needing to experience it physically? Yes. Sometimes, yes. Okay, I had another question. I was watching K-C-E-T the other night, and they had a program on multiple personalities. One fellow there, I think they had 53 different personalities. Oh, very creative. Yeah. And the manifestation is each of the, most of the personalities do not know of the other personalities. Some of the personalities... Oh, so they would like you to believe. Right. Well, the conscious manifestation... Yes, yes, yes. We understand. Of course. The belief of the scientists exploring this is that possibly it's multiple beings in the body in the body, which I think is not the case. Would you care to comment on what... What is actually occurring with us? much in the same way, for the most part, that many of what you call your psychologists think is happening. They are suppressing portions of themselves, and that is the creative way they can allow them to rise to the surface and be equally valid to every other portion. It is then, in this way, their opportunity, their methodology to believe that they need outside help, as you say, the psychologist, to allow them to integrate all these portions of their personality. into one functional being. Okay, well, we all have portions of ourselves, you know, various portions of ourselves, and some of us separate more than others, but some of us are aware of these different portions without having to feel that they are distinct separate beings. Simply in this way, recognize that what they have not learned in this physical life is the method of communication between those separate portions. Well, I assume not unlike the frequent inability, conceived inability, conceived in the ability of ourselves to communicate between our aware consciousness and subconsciousness and unconsciousness. Yes, and you may also understand the idea of multiple personality in this way. It is inwardly directed autism. Okay. You follow me. No. What's autism? An autistic individual Oh, I know. Yeah. Is incommunicative to your outside world. Okay. but very communicative to its inside world. Multiple personality individual is not communicative to its inside world, but very communicative to its outside world. Multiple personality is almost directly opposite the idea you call autism. I need idea. Very creative. Yes! See all the multitudinous ways you have it exploring separation of self. Very creative. creators. We learn a lot from you. One moment, one moment. Female. Yes. You can share with my past about my, my new baby, me, her name is, and she was, my sister contracted something called toxin of chalism during her pregnancy.

outside world. Multiple personality is almost directly opposite the idea you call autism. I need idea. Very creative. Yes! See all the multitudinous ways you have it exploring separation of self. Very creative. creators. We learn a lot from you. One moment, one moment. Female. Yes. You can share with my past about my, my new baby, me, her name is, and she was, my sister contracted something called toxin of chalism during her pregnancy. Lots and lots and lots of touching. Lots of loving, lots of touching. Lots of touching. Lots of mental communication, lots of reinforcement, lots of mental imagery of the child being able to communicate in whatever way it needs to. In whatever way it needs to. Not how they think it should. Understand that many of these opportunities are opportunities for your society to explore new ways of communication. This is a service being done by this child. You follow me. Your acceptance and allowance of this service to be done will allow the parents to communicate fully with the child and the child fully with the parents and the society. This is the lesson being taught by the child. What you're saying is going to communicate only in the child. Only in a sense. sense, let us say potentially. Potentially in the sense that if the message is not received, then understand what it is a reflection of is the individuals not willing to receive the message their own limitation, not the child's limitation. I am. I thought a life has been... alive as an American Indian. I was a man and my wife and child were killed. My wife and destroyed our village and I found my wife and then the person is now my sister. And a couple of days of the child from that life was this child would need. All right. Do you have that feeling about, do you think that... Only that, the symbol being pro-offered now by the child who, understands in having waited, quote unquote, until you were both physically born and into your later years before being born itself, will be that it comes into your world with a greater innocence, less limited understanding of exactly what the quote-unquote created problem was in that time. Lack of communication between two different worlds. You follow me. Lack of understanding. Understand the child. That is all that is necessary. Understand. Stand under. Support the child. Support the idea that the child is expressing. And all the messages will be crystal clear. Oh, thank you. Fight the child. Thank the parents. For us. For sure? Yes. Relating to what you were talking about before, but letting yourself go and following your imagination, and this is also related to judging others. If we as parents would let our children do whatever they want, I really don't understand. We've got to teach them. Now, this does not mean judging. This means preference. The teaching of preference as opposed to judgment.

thank you. Fight the child. Thank the parents. For us. For sure? Yes. Relating to what you were talking about before, but letting yourself go and following your imagination, and this is also related to judging others. If we as parents would let our children do whatever they want, I really don't understand. We've got to teach them. Now, this does not mean judging. This means preference. The teaching of preference as opposed to judgment. as opposed to judgment, which is an invalidation of something. Preference is not. In this way, simply recognize that there is, obviously, because of the physical limitations upon the mentality and the consciousness, the opportunity for the training in this way of the child to a certain degree. But also recognize that much of what you, quote unquote, fear you must teach the child, is being. Because you have already, many times, not saying you specifically, but in general, parents already have taught the child to fear certain things. And thus in this way, you will find that the child will be acting on some of those fears or reacting to some of those fears rather than simply being allowed by the parent initially from birth and before birth to recognize. recognize that the child knows already when it is born what it is doing in a sense. Right, but we still have to send them to school and we can't let them play in the backyard. One moment. When they want to play. But understand again, you are only giving as, quote unquote, excuses, illusions based on illusions. The idea, in the way you have created the idea of going to school and the safety of your children is based upon the fear that you teach them when they are born. Yes. That this is the way it must be done because we fear such and such and such. And you are creating a loop so that by the time they are doing such and such and such and say, why, you simply find the only answer to me because this is the way it always has been. That's right now. So what, from your point of view, how do you see the world to be, the, this plan is to be? this plan is to be in terms of education of children, for example. In this way, we can only again not tell you what to do, but so we suggest by reference, by analogy, that within our society, first of all, we are in communication with the being before they are born. We know who and what they are and why they are being born into our society, and we know they know they know it. Also in this way, their interaction with us is complete and totally. complete and total. And in this way, they are isolated to be taught. They are allowed into the fabric of society to be taught.

society, first of all, we are in communication with the being before they are born. We know who and what they are and why they are being born into our society, and we know they know they know it. Also in this way, their interaction with us is complete and totally. complete and total. And in this way, they are isolated to be taught. They are allowed into the fabric of society to be taught. And in this way, each child recognizes each adult to be his or her parents. Each adult recognizes each child to be his or her own in terms of the idea of the spontaneous interactions which take place. Yes. There is not the need for the tool of fear. Now recognize that by the time your child is able to be up and about by itself. It has already been programmed by you to know that limitation and know the fears that you have because it has to depend upon you for physical survival. It will accept anything you. anything you teach it vocally and non-vocally. Not really. In it personality, yes, it will completely. What would new parents on this planet should they do to change? What can they do to change? Allow themselves to know that they can trust that the child being born knows what it is doing. They can trust that their own connection to the child and the child and the child's connection to them is never broken. They are always in communication that the child and the parents will always sense what the other is doing and why. And that the child will know, instinctively, and by receiving from the parents vocally and non-vocally, its reassurance of its innate safety and assuredness in creativity that it will always only do that which will be positively manifesting for the child. for the child and not negatively manifesting for the child because it will not feel the fear from the parents that the child must react to. Follow me. Yes, thank you. Thank you. Yes, sir. One moment. Back to the question about multiple personalities. Yes. Is there frequently cases where there actually two beings are stuck together to one body? Not stuck. No one is ever stuck. In this. This way you may find there is an opportunity to some degree to experience this idea. Now allow me to point out that to a certain extent you are experiencing that idea right now, my consciousness and the consciousness of the physical channel form a third personality that you are interacting with. Thus you can say there are two identities that you are now communicating with. That has become a third identity. identity. In this way, recognize all is by agreement, all is by synchronization of vibrational energy. And each concept unto itself is a complete idea. It is not that what you are communicating with is half me and half darrow. It is its own concept. You follow me. Yes.

personality that you are interacting with. Thus you can say there are two identities that you are now communicating with. That has become a third identity. identity. In this way, recognize all is by agreement, all is by synchronization of vibrational energy. And each concept unto itself is a complete idea. It is not that what you are communicating with is half me and half darrow. It is its own concept. You follow me. Yes. But we wouldn't normally normally. Run into people who are aggregations of lots of personalities that are separate to state feelings. But you do all the time. All of you are aggregations of many different ideas. Yes, but not separate, not direct from several. Some, yes. Could you talk more about that day? Why? It's interesting. Why? What is so interesting about it? That there are several over souls that can be one individual? Understand in this way the idea you call over-soul simply will carry within its own quote-unquote revenue a series of reincarnational lives. An oversoul can split off and become another soul. And thus in a way, individuals in one reincarnational cycle can actually have more than one over soul, in a sense. Understand that all of these connections are very arbitrary. They are all products of labeling, all products of diversification, all products of perspective, especially from the third density point of view. They are all meaningful as tools, valid as perspectives that you allow you to explore certain ideas and aspects of yourself, but on another level are all quite meaningless. as all is one consciousness. Are you saying that one body would be the manifestation of two or more over souls? It can be if the purposes of the over souls coincide. What frequency or what percentage of the time does this actually occur on this planet? There is no way to translate that to you. Would you say it's rare or common? There is no way to translate that to you. It is something which is beyond time. In general, though, what we consider an individual being manifesting in an individual body, I think Ken's original question was two individuals of that nature inhabiting a single body, or is that correct, Ken? Yeah, or 50, Mike, your case. Yeah. Not your case is right. The case in my question. You've got 40. Thank you. One more time. Allow me to say, first of all. First of all, we understand the concept you are pro-authoring, but realize that from our point of view, the idea that anything can inhabit a body is a non sequoher. Recognize nothing can inhabit anything. Your soul does not really, really, really exist in your body. Your soul is your body. Your body is your body. soul from another point of view.

40. Thank you. One more time. Allow me to say, first of all. First of all, we understand the concept you are pro-authoring, but realize that from our point of view, the idea that anything can inhabit a body is a non sequoher. Recognize nothing can inhabit anything. Your soul does not really, really, really exist in your body. Your soul is your body. Your body is your body. soul from another point of view. Even when you see the idea of being out of body or seeing the soul leave upon death, physical death, this is an interpretation of the third density understanding of the separation of the self. Nothing exists in anything, everything is everything. In that respect, then your entire reality, all physicality. physicality would be the same as what you're saying. Yes. And therefore it can be said and why your question cannot be specifically answered, that you are all, each and every one of you, one thing, and all, each and every one of you, everything, and every personality that could ever exist. You are both. You are at both ends of the spectrum. You are the spectrum. You are all personalities. personalities, you are all over souls, you are all spirit levels and alternate dimensions of density, all, anything you wish to be. It is only a matter of perspective, how you see yourself. Sure. One moment. Yeah, so you wouldn't find two spiritual entities jointly controlling the body or one, mostly controlling another one contributing ideas in a general sense. All right, as we understand your question, allow me to say, generally, no. That will be of the most service to you as an answer. Thank you. Thank you. Was there a male before the female? Yes. Then the female. In one view or one perspective upon reality, reality, quote, quote, quote, is that being this is the underpinning or the basis for all that is. And that knowing this would be the first separation out of being this, and that physical energy is a product of knowing this. Is this? Yes, in a sense. It will do. How then, is it a point? Is it possible to channel, as it were, negative energy, or redirect would be a better word, negative energy, so that one would be able to heal? In other words, turn that negative direction into a positive channel so that you can heal either yourself or others. By offering a positive vibration and allowing the individual who is expressing and offering an offering, the negative vibration to choose a positive vibration for themselves. In other words, offering to them the idea. Through your knowingness, offering them the opportunity to allow positive energy and negative energy to be equal to each other so that they can choose from equal choices. Right, okay, or in the same way offering them the idea that they don't have to be trapped and that there's no decision to be made. Yes. Yes.

offering, the negative vibration to choose a positive vibration for themselves. In other words, offering to them the idea. Through your knowingness, offering them the opportunity to allow positive energy and negative energy to be equal to each other so that they can choose from equal choices. Right, okay, or in the same way offering them the idea that they don't have to be trapped and that there's no decision to be made. Yes. Yes. There is, in a sense, a decision to be made. But... But the decision is theirs? Yes. Okay, I have another question along with another band. Um, and the communications device, um, of the several stacked... Yes, yes, yes. Okay. I would like to make mine out of copper and not use crystal. All right. Will that, will that significantly change? It will change it to some degree. You may. As we have suggested also, substitute for the crystal at this time the substance you call teak. Teak wood. It will allow them to be an appropriate insulator. While not expressing some of the ideas of the crystalline form, it will suffice to prevent a distortion in the field that would result if it were all. result if it were all copper. You follow me? Yes, very good. The antenna that is to extend out of the top, the full, the full... Yes. Okay. Does that antenna extend into only the top pyramid or through all three levels to the bottom? From the top, from the base of the top, out. Only in the top. And the thickness of that, that is a solid rod, not a hot. They are solid rod, not a hollow two. They are all solid rods. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Are you sure? Female. I'm sure I want to explore a little bit more about the idea of the experience of and the over-soul. Based on the idea that there really is no time that such... There is in physical reality. Yeah. Outside of physical reality, there is... There is the concept of time, but it isn't. Experiential as you know it. Okay. So we have, let's say, one individual here who's got an experience going in this lifetime in the fiscal universe. We know it. Now, let's say that there are two or three oversawls who, without being in the time stream and all the experiences simultaneous, would want to or benefit from that particular life experience. Could they not, by a consideration, experience that lifetime as well? Yes, if it serves a purpose. Yes. Right. There can be many ideas which act as fulcrum points, pivot points, for many different separations of the soul-self. They can be common ground, you follow me. The only thing that I've found curious about that was that we all seem to be so diverse, so unique because of our own experiences and our own accumulation of experiences in certain patterns and ways, even though we're all basically well. All right.

a purpose. Yes. Right. There can be many ideas which act as fulcrum points, pivot points, for many different separations of the soul-self. They can be common ground, you follow me. The only thing that I've found curious about that was that we all seem to be so diverse, so unique because of our own experiences and our own accumulation of experiences in certain patterns and ways, even though we're all basically well. All right. Understand that because this is also a transformation in life, this idea expresses more opportunity to exist now in your reality than it has before. Because you are now bringing together in this physical life many ideas which are focusing from many different alternate time tracks and over soul selves. The whole, the science we're talking about. Yes. I don't know. Thank you. Thank you. Proceed. Well, that was basically it. I was just looking at the fact that without time considerations that any overso at any kind of any kind. Why not? Thank you. Sorry. Is yoga soul the same as the higher self? In a sense, it can function in that manner. You can also create a separated version of the higher self that has a specific attunement to any specific life. It will be then a fragment of another type. Like Sherman claim? Sense, yes. Though it can be, again, very nebulous, fine line between the idea, between the idea of higher self and over soul. They are basically one of the same things. Okay. Yes. In Scientology, there's a concept. In Scientology, there's a concept called. body thinking, wherein the idea of separate entities do theoretically inhabit a body along with the being that supposedly running the body. And this idea involves a phenomenon, which I'm not intimately familiar with, but which I understand from a frame. He can, he experiences what he believes is believing of one of these beings. And he told me a story about one time when one of these beings supposedly left his body. and the fellow that he was standing right next to perceived this phenomenon in such a way that he had personally experienced some kind of sensation experience. Yes. Could you tell me what it is that they were actually experiencing? The sharing of their particular reality, of their belief systems, and thus the reflection of that in their physical reality.