Part 1
Hello, Bashar. And are you good day. My question relates to the one and all that is. Yes. And the difference between conscience and sentience. It might understand that the one has no vehicle for experience. Correct. It is unaware of itself. It has no self-reference. It is totally homogenous, thus has no reflection. But because it is the one and contains everything, it does contain the concept of reflection. And it is only from that particular point that reflection is created and turns the one into the all that is that is aware of itself as everything, and that is thus then conscious. Does that make sense? Sort of. So does the one not contain a personality construct? It contains everything but does not know it contains it. Only the all that is. knows it contains it. Does that make sense? The one does not know itself. It is unknowable. It has no way of knowing that it exists. It has no reflective quality. No self-reflective quality. But the reflective quality that exists within it has created the reflection that we call all that is because it knows itself. And thus to know yourself, you have to have a reflective quality. Does that make sense in your own? language. Yeah. But the one does not experience the reflective quality, only all that is does. So all that is is the only portion of the one that experiences knowingness of itself and reflection. But the one, the greater one that contains, in a sense, the all that is does not. So no experience can be had of the one or in the one. can only be had in all that is. Yes? Does that make sense? Yes. Yes. Thank you for that. All right. And in relation to speaking about the Trinity this weekend, what would complete the Trinity between the one and of it is? You. And all that is? You. Me. is within all that is. Does this make sense? There is the one, the one becomes the all. Yes? Yes. But what all that is is are all the differentiations, yes? Yes. All the individuations, yes? Yes. So there is duality already in all that is. Yes? Because you have the all, in that sense, that knows itself as the all, but it also knows itself as all the individual pieces that it is. So you have the duality of the whole and the parts. Therefore, the Trinity is the one, or the all, or the isness. Is this translating into your language in any way that makes sense to you? Absolutely. Absolutely. Can you repeat it back? Yes. Definitely. Go ahead. So the trinity between the one and all that is, the one has no reflection and has no way of experiencing itself, all that is, is the vehicle for that experience, and the completion of that is our individuality in all of that is, that contributes to the overall collective experience. Yes. Yes.
Part 2
into your language in any way that makes sense to you? Absolutely. Absolutely. Can you repeat it back? Yes. Definitely. Go ahead. So the trinity between the one and all that is, the one has no reflection and has no way of experiencing itself, all that is, is the vehicle for that experience, and the completion of that is our individuality in all of that is, that contributes to the overall collective experience. Yes. Yes. Because it's really, actually, when you express it as a Trinity, it's really one, one, and it's actually, and it's One, all, that is. That is is, is the third part of it. Because all knows itself as a singular identity, but knows itself as an infinite number of individual identities. That's the third part. So it's really one, all that is. All that is is an expression of duality, even in that phrase. The one are the all. all, they all are the one. Do you understand? Yeah. That's the duality in that. So there you have the Trinity in the one, the all, and the that is. Make sense? Yes, thank you for that. That right.